Started By
Message
re: College Football attendance continues to drop...
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:00 am to Hugh McElroy
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:00 am to Hugh McElroy
Ole Miss capacity was 2,000 lower than last year due to removal of seats and addition of suites in anticipation of expansion now under way. Their 2015 average attendance actually exceeded capacity.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:00 am to CNB
quote:
That is still the greatest rammer jammer video I've ever seen. Sounded and looked like an Alabama home game.
I feel like we brought more in 2012, but weren't nearly as loud like in 08. In '12, it was ridiculous outside of the stadium. Complete sea of red
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:24 am to Hugh McElroy
In the face of a declining market Butch Jones still manages to make this happen.
Tennessee 100,584 +1%
Tennessee 100,584 +1%
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:54 am to Hugh McElroy
It would be far more accurate to list attendance compared to the listed stadium capacity. (Using only stadiums with 80,000+ capacity)
Oklahoma: 104.0%
Michigan: 102.4%
Ohio State: 102.2%
Florida: 101.7%
Nebraska: 101.0%
Texas A&M: 100.9%
Clemson: 100.3%
Georgia: 100.0%
Auburn: 100.0%
Notre Dame: 100.0%
Alabama: 99.3%
Tennessee: 98.2%
South Carolina: 98.2%
Wisconsin: 97.1%
Penn State: 93.6%
LSU: 91.3% (because of the South Carolina Game)
Texas: 89.9%
Florida State: 89.0%
USC: 80.5%
UCLA: 72.2%
If you're below 90% in a stadium that seats over 80,000, you suck as a fanbase.
Oklahoma: 104.0%
Michigan: 102.4%
Ohio State: 102.2%
Florida: 101.7%
Nebraska: 101.0%
Texas A&M: 100.9%
Clemson: 100.3%
Georgia: 100.0%
Auburn: 100.0%
Notre Dame: 100.0%
Alabama: 99.3%
Tennessee: 98.2%
South Carolina: 98.2%
Wisconsin: 97.1%
Penn State: 93.6%
LSU: 91.3% (because of the South Carolina Game)
Texas: 89.9%
Florida State: 89.0%
USC: 80.5%
UCLA: 72.2%
If you're below 90% in a stadium that seats over 80,000, you suck as a fanbase.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 11:56 am to Hugh McElroy
LSU's numbers include the USCe game, which was unique. Without it, I believe their numbers actually went up.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:19 pm to Tennessee Jed
quote:
FSU, UF, and Miami do not have real fans. They're all side-walkers that jump from program to program depending on who is relevant at any given time.
This is patently false but there's no penalty for being wrong and a liar on the interwebs so it's all good.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:21 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
South Carolina 78,822 -3%
Honestly that's a miracle. Print the frickin' shirts.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:32 pm to Nissanmaxima
quote:
I think what you are seeing is a drop in attendance for all sports college and pros. People just can't afford this type of entertainment right now. They are pricing themselves out from where the normal blue collar worker can't afford to attend. JMO though.
Not to mention that every single game is available on TV now. Aside from a few big games, I'd rather watch most of them from my couch or at the sports bar.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:39 pm to Tennessee Jed
quote:UF has more fans than UToothless
FSU, UF, and Miami do not have real fans. They're all side-walkers that jump from program to program depending on who is relevant at any given time.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:44 pm to Pigfeet
quote:
OM has a Sugar Bowl year and they drop in attendance with only 60k.
OM fans are poor
Ole Miss had a stadium renovation that reduced capacity for 1 year. Every game sold out. Capacity to 64k next year
Posted on 12/18/15 at 12:50 pm to TailbackU
quote:
ACC football sucks
quote:
Auburn fan
Yet the Tigers lost to a team in the National Title from an inferior conference. That is ironic.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:10 pm to cardboardboxer
FSU doesn't have true true fans is what's up.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:22 pm to Stillinthegrove
quote:
I think our drop is mainly due to a poor home schedule this year. We played crap teams like Vanderbilt, Texas A&M, and LSU at home. Our big games such as Florida and Alabama were on the road.
Texas Aggies have 104,000+ butts in stadium to watch us play Ball State. That is what fan support looks like.
You have a momentary bright spot in your long history of sucking in your tinkertoy stadium and you call other SEC programs Shite teams?
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:25 pm to Taurus 357
quote:
Yet the Tigers lost to a team in the National Title from an inferior conference. That is ironic.
That's not irony, dumbfrick.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:29 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Any kind of drop is discouraging, especially when you just built the greatest $400 billion stadium college football has ever witnessed.
The drop is due to capacity decreasing by about 6,000 seats.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:32 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
Capacity to 64k next year
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:32 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Any kind of drop is discouraging, especially when you just built the greatest $400 billion stadium college football has ever witnessed.
You know the capacity dropped by ~7K this year, right?
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:41 pm to CockHolliday
quote:
quote:
South Carolina 78,822 -3%
Honestly that's a miracle. Print the frickin' shirts.
98.22% capacity of Williams-Brice in a season that saw Spurrier resign, biblical floods, and the best SEC home game on the schedule moved to Baton Rouge.
S12 - 82178 / 80250 Kentucky
S26 - 78411 / 80250 Central Florida (Spurrier resigned following tuesday)
O17 - 75159 / 80250 Vanderbilt (first W-B game post-floods)
N14 - 78536 / 80250 Florida
N21 - 77241 / 80250 The Citadel
N28 - 81409 / 80250 Pickens Sanitarium
1 game at W-B over 6 football weekends. bizarre, even for our Odyssey.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:46 pm to Stonehog
quote:
A&M doesn't care if the stadium is filled, they just need it to be bigger than UT's.
A&M averaged 100.9% of its stadium's listed capacity over the course of the season. Only 6 other programs averaged over a sellout crowd (Oklahoma, Michigan, Ohio State, Florida, Nebraska, and Clemson). Georgia, Auburn, and Notre Dame averaged right at 100%
Before you even try to bring up certain programs, if you have a stadium smaller than 60,000, you shouldn't even be included in this discussion.
Arkansas averaged 86.6%. That's even worse than Texas (89.9%)
The FAIL is strong with this one.
Posted on 12/18/15 at 1:47 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I like the subtly dig at Texas choosing 90% as the cut off. Whatever takes the inferiority off your chest. An interesting note though is that Texas, UCLA, and USC are in cities with horrendous infrastructure and very high COL compared to some of the other cities. Bad combination for college students and young graduates in these cities who can't afford and for older people who don't want to deal with LA or Austin traffic and the nightmare it presents
Popular
Back to top


0








