Started By
Message
re: Chik-fil-a kickoff game on Saturday night. Auburn or Clemson?
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:13 pm to BhamDore
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:13 pm to BhamDore
quote:
Secondary has a lot of highly rated guys who have not played to their rankings.
These highly rated guys are sophomores for the most part, with Bell being the only 4* upperclassman. Therezie and Whitehead are the other two soph's that are starting and both were 4*'s and Erique Florence will be in the mix at S too. He missed some practices due to an injury, so he's a little behind right now. It's yet to be determined if they've played to their rankings.
I personally think our secondary will be pretty good this year.
It's true our LB's are not the best this year, but I think we'll see some improvement out of them from last year. They'll have to play great all year for our defense to do well.
And I believe you said something to the affect of our OL will be terrible as well as our QB play based off what you saw last year. Do you own a jump to conclusions mat?
0
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:13 pm to TheMightyTerrier
quote:
Not saying we're better, not saying we're worse, but all these reasons as to why we will lose are also applicable to Clemson. Clemson is getting a lot of credit for last year going into this season, but I don't think they will be near as good.
Clemson doesn't have a first year starter at QB. It can make that big of a difference in a game.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:16 pm to stronghouse
quote:
Clemson doesn't have a first year starter at QB. It can make that big of a difference in a game.
This is true, but if their OL gets beat all game, that won't make too much of a difference. Even if he can scramble, we can force him to make some bad passes, and as I said above, I think our secondary is going to be pretty good this year.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:16 pm to stronghouse
So can an OL. I think everyone agrees that CU OL vs AU DL is much more of a mismatch than AU OL and CU DL.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:17 pm to BhamDore
quote:
Not saying AU has zero chance because for some reason God does favor AU, but it will definitely be an upset.
And it will be becasue dado shat the bed.
Look you're run your mouth saying the same thing in a hundred different ways about this, you've suggested that anyone who doesnt' think like you is a fool and you're just downright too invested in it.
obviously i hope you're wrong, and that you're cowardly and you don't just start this shite over again next week if auburn wins.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:24 pm to piggidyphish
The fact that anyone still attempts to have a civil argument with BhamDore is comical to me.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:47 pm to GhostBuster6
quote:
Clemson? Sturdy defense? Does not compute
Agreed. And I hear Watkins is not playing. AU edges CU-27-24.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 12:48 pm to stronghouse
quote:
Clemson doesn't have a first year starter at QB. It can make that big of a difference in a game.
Last three BCSNC had this too.
Wonder if the curve is still have steep as we all think it is.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 1:00 pm to RANDY44
quote:
Clemson? Sturdy defense? Does not compute
Agreed. And I hear Watkins is not playing. AU edges CU-27-24.
Don't forget that Clempson lost their best two on the DL as well as brought in a new DC, so they've had to learn a brand new defense as well.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 1:01 pm to kage
AU-new O
CU-new D
wash
AU-new D
CU-AU's old O
adv AU
CU-new D
wash
AU-new D
CU-AU's old O
adv AU
Posted on 8/27/12 at 1:02 pm to Rig
quote:
The fact that anyone still attempts to have a civil argument with BhamDore is comical to me.
Agreed. I find it just as comical when someone gets into it with Mullen3:16. It's kinda sad when it's one of my fellow Auburn fans, but, I guess some people never see the hook - just the bait.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 1:09 pm to Mullen3:16
quote:
Can Auburn really even be considered part of the big 6 anymore?
Stupid question..you should prolly ask Georgia or Tennessee tho...
Posted on 8/27/12 at 1:11 pm to lsufan1580307
quote:
lsufan1580307
why'd you put your password next to your username?
Posted on 8/27/12 at 1:14 pm to BhamDore
quote:
ts well documented AU had the worst coached Lbers of any of the big 6 schools
FIFY
Posted on 8/27/12 at 1:18 pm to thirdlawson
Is that your bunkbed?
Posted on 8/27/12 at 2:02 pm to lsufan1580307
I could give a shite about either of these programs but since Auburn isn't going to do a damn thing of note in the SEC this year, I hope they beat the piss out of those Taters so I don't have to hear those morons on talk radio for the first 2 and a half months of the season talking about how they are at the top of the national title picture.
Posted on 8/27/12 at 2:14 pm to LowcountryGamecock
quote:So you give a shite?
I could give a shite about either of these programs
That's like saying "I could care less".. doesn't make any sense.
quote:That's what happens when USCe rotates off our schedule. I'm sure you're happy you avoid the automatic "L".
Auburn isn't going to do a damn thing of note in the SEC this year
This post was edited on 8/27/12 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 8/27/12 at 2:14 pm to lsufan1580307
That awkward moment when you realize Willie Martinez knows the complete ins and outs of Brent Venables' defense.
ETA: Thanks kk for pointing that out
ETA: Thanks kk for pointing that out
This post was edited on 8/27/12 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 8/27/12 at 2:15 pm to TheSandman
Posted on 8/27/12 at 2:15 pm to lsufan1580307
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/27/12 at 2:16 pm
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News