Started By
Message
re: Cecil Newton Admits Money Talks, Says Source {Link}
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:32 pm to Bamascoopfan
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:32 pm to Bamascoopfan
So he's ineligible assuming this is true.
Now the question is does the NCAA stop there, or do they turn their focus away from State/Newtons and toward Auburn/Newtons?
Now the question is does the NCAA stop there, or do they turn their focus away from State/Newtons and toward Auburn/Newtons?
0
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:32 pm to e2drummer
It all comes down to which story you believe.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:32 pm to Hog Springs
Since this is a father asking for money for his son's services I am sure that will meet the NCAA's requirement of "on behalf." This seems to be a last minute desperation, hail mary, by Cecil to save his son.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:33 pm to LSUthrilla
Does Cam knowing anything really matter?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:33 pm to Kingpin
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:33 pm to Kingpin
They went and got a lawyer and this is the best they could come up with. Auburn is fricked and while their at it scope out this lawyer and see who's really paying him.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:33 pm to PuntBamaPunt
quote:I'm starting to believe you're a troll.
Dont forget the pos middleman this, aint over yet
Though, if you're not, you have one hand clinging on to the last bit of rope you can find.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:34 pm to Crede15
I think it does because a lot of people in the media are trying to make it look like he was the victim of a greedy father. I heard a local radio guy say this exact thing today. He felt Cam was not in on it and that his dad was the one to blame. I think they acted together on this deal personally and he knew about it all along. Even his JUCO transfer was pretty fishy to me.
This post was edited on 11/12/10 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:34 pm to Crede15
No,Cam not knowing anything isnt a valid excuse bc his dad was acting on his behalf.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:35 pm to Hoya Saxa
quote:
If someone connected to a player takes these actions, they may be imputed to the player.
But what constitutes "on a player's behalf." (quoted from the NCAA spokesperson) Is a immediate family relationship enough or does the athlete have to know it's happening?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:35 pm to diehardfan
Everyone should not forget that coaches are on record with the NCAA stating that Cam said "the money was too much at Auburn." He knew but it will be a he said, she said situation in regard to Cam's comment. Are you going to believe and SEC coach or are you going to believe a kid who's been caught cheating on tests, committing multiple traffic violations and stealing laptops?
This post was edited on 11/12/10 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:35 pm to Hog Springs
The truth is coming out slowly but surely. Loving every minute of this.
LSU = BCS title game
LSU = BCS title game
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:36 pm to DawgFARKer
quote:
Cam Newton's Dad Admits Money Talks, Says Source
quote:
says
ESPN, SEC Rant>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>TMZ
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:36 pm to Xenophon
quote:
i think if Cam does not know about it, then it is not 'on his behalf'..
You're kidding right?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:37 pm to Bamascoopfan
quote:
Cam had to know something was going on. He was practically a lock for MSU at one point and then his dad mysteriously directed him to Auburn. He had to have known there was a reason for that.
What if his dad didn't confess to Cam until after he did the soliciting?
This post was edited on 11/12/10 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:38 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
I think it does because a lot of people in the media are trying to make it look like he was the victim of a greedy father. I heard a local radio guy say this exact thing today. He felt Cam was not in on it and that his dad was the one to blame. I think they acted together on this deal personally and he knew about it all along. Even his JUCO transfer was pretty fishy to me.
Yeah, perception wise, it matters, NCAA wise it doesn't.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:39 pm to LSUthrilla
quote:
No,Cam not knowing anything isnt a valid excuse bc his dad was acting on his behalf.
i doubt its as simple as that.. i could request money to help get a kid to sign somewhere.. does that constitute it being on their behalf?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:40 pm to Xenophon
i doubt its as simple as that.. i could request money to help get a kid to sign somewhere.. does that constitute it being on their behalf?
Depends. Are you that kids father?
Depends. Are you that kids father?
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:41 pm to Jaydeaux
quote:
You're kidding right?
why would i be kidding? i bet this is the angle they are taking.. if you request money to help sign me to Blue Mountain State, does that constitute it being on my behalf? I dont know you.
Posted on 11/12/10 at 9:41 pm to Xenophon
I don't know the NCAA bylaws but I think they would categorize it differently if your father asked on your behalf.
Page 3 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News