Started By
Message
re: Can someone explain to me why King's fumble should have been a targeting call.....
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:11 am to Gonadballbarian
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:11 am to Gonadballbarian
quote:
Your helmet doesn't get knocked back because someone hits you in the chest
You're not familiar with physics or the human body.
2
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:12 am to UFFan
Melt bitch
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:12 am to TexasOnTop
Dan didn't make contact to his head and the big12 last year is irrelevant. It's not targeting it wasn't called targeting, go dawgs
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:13 am to koreandawg
quote:
His head is gonna pop back. He got hit hard. Happens all the time and why sometimes they throw a targeting flag and have to pick it up when they see targeting didn't occur on replay.
You can tell the helmets collide by looking at that video.
quote:
While I get it's a rule, have you ever seen them call a player for lowering their helmet if they hit a player in the, chest, back, etc? It's almost always when heads collide or the neck area. And players do it all the time.
I think they want players to see what they’re hitting so they can avoid the head. I don’t agree with the rule, it’s just my interpretation of it.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:13 am to Bigdawgb
What do you mean even then it was a clean hit? The rules are way more stricter today. Not back then. It probably was clean back then. It definitely isn't today. You don't lower your helmet and put the crown of it into Someone Else's Facemask
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:13 am to UFFan
Quit crying already. You're bleeding all over the board. I gave you multiple calls that went against UGA but you just keep bleeding all over the place
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:14 am to dhuck20
No...hat on Face mask
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:15 am to koreandawg
Lmfao. It wasn't a reaction of momentum following a chest hit you complete buffoon. It was direct contact from the helmet to the facemask, regardless if it also hit the chest. You'd have to be an imbecile to think otherwise
This post was edited on 11/30/24 at 12:16 am
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:15 am to Gonadballbarian
No video shows a hat on a facemask. They'd have to have proof that he did it to call it from upstairs. They don't.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:19 am to Bigdawgb
quote:
Wild I played less than a decade ago and even then this was a clean hit. Lowest man wins. Helmet ain't popping out he's getting down to make a solid tacole
It's been a penalty called spearing since the 1970s in the NFL, not sure college footballs exact line, but it was spearing in high school too.
This post was edited on 11/30/24 at 12:20 am
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:19 am to 3down10
quote:
It's been a penalty called spearing since the 1970s.
When have you seen it called?
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:20 am to koreandawg
I'm looking at the video. And the refs are on the field watching the play. Live. In the video the top of his helmet is in line with his face mask. As soon as it makes contact, the gt helmet pops backwards. That is the first thing that moved After the contact. It's so blatantly obvious you'd have to be half retarded to think differently.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:20 am to Gonadballbarian
You have no proof Albert E.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:21 am to koreandawg
quote:
When have you seen it called?
Well, it's all targeting now and it wasn't called for unintentional hits very often at all.
This post was edited on 11/30/24 at 12:22 am
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:21 am to Gonadballbarian
quote:
I'm looking at the video. And the refs are on the field watching the play. Live. In the video the top of his helmet is in line with his face mask. As soon as it makes contact, the gt helmet pops backwards. That is the first thing that moved After the contact. It's so blatantly obvious you'd have to be half retarded to think differently.
If it's blatantly obvious why is there no video? Why didn't the Tech coaching staff and King go nuts?
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:25 am to Gonadballbarian
quote:
Your helmet doesn't get knocked back because someone hits you in the chest
Explain why tech didn’t have two different targetings? Refs called it fair.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:26 am to Gonadballbarian
quote:
I'm looking at the video. And the refs are on the field watching the play. Live. In the video the top of his helmet is in line with his face mask. As soon as it makes contact, the gt helmet pops backwards. That is the first thing that moved After the contact. It's so blatantly obvious you'd have to be half retarded to think differently.
Not definitive like the 2 tech targets that went uncalled.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:32 am to koreandawg
quote:
physics
Objects in motion tend to stay in motion. At initial contact, a runner's head will continue moving forward if contacted in the chest or torso. Same way your head goes backwards when you're hit from behind in a car.
I don't know if it was targeting or not but physics isn't the right argument against.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:50 am to 3down10
quote:
It's been a penalty called spearing since the 1970s in the NFL, not sure college footballs exact line, but it was spearing in high school too.
Get out of here dude nobody is calling that shite spearing in 1980 are you insane. There are so many videos of dudes launching themselves with their heads -that's truly targeting...this isn't even close
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:52 am to Gonadballbarian
quote:
Your helmet doesn't get knocked back because someone hits you in the chest
Tell me you don’t know what you’re talking about without saying it.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News