Started By
Message
re: Can someone explain to me why King's fumble should have been a targeting call.....
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:20 am to antibarner
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:20 am to antibarner
quote:
If merely leading with the crown of the helmet is targeting,
It's not the rule anymore. It's a 6" circle at the top of the helmet. They would have never seen that on replay.
0
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:27 am to koreandawg
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Just off the top of my head with an example nowhere near a offensive players head?
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:31 am to koreandawg
I thought it was live, watched the replay and saw it wasn’t.
Great play by the safety, saved the game. Without that it’s probably get the ball back with about a minute to go and no time outs needing to drive the length of the field to score.
Great play by the safety, saved the game. Without that it’s probably get the ball back with about a minute to go and no time outs needing to drive the length of the field to score.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:37 am to koreandawg
quote:Can someone explain this?
koreandawg
quote:
Stupidity and low IQs seem to be rampant with posters who have either the word "dawg" in their name, or the corrupted Green Baybeside their name.
This post was edited on 11/30/24 at 8:06 am
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:43 am to Cool McCool
I cant wait for the games today to see how many time I can call targeting every time a player’s helmet makes contact with another player during a tackle.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:52 am to TexasOnTop
Rules for targeting are different while in the pocket.
Also that was a good clean hit.
The qb ducks his head to prepare tomorrow contact and got his face mask hit.
Also that was a good clean hit.
The qb ducks his head to prepare tomorrow contact and got his face mask hit.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:54 am to TexasOnTop
If that's the play we're talking about, I don't agree that it is targeting.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:56 am to koreandawg
It was a good hard clean hit. I had no problem at all with the no call.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:03 am to TexasOnTop
Led with crown of helmet.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:03 am to LSUBALLER
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:04 am to theRealJesseD
Also targeting. I agree
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:06 am to LSUBALLER
And the one on Lovett’s TD catch
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:06 am to llfshoals
After a night’s sleep and rewatching the replay multiple times, I also am good with the no call. The reason everyone is having a cow right now is because the rule sucks and is inconsistently applied, and because there’s a sense Georgia got a win it didn’t deserve last night.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:07 am to theRealJesseD
Ok , still doesn’t make leading with helmet on play all are talking about right.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:08 am to koreandawg
quote:
Not to me.
Both responses to you. I will save you the trouble of searching and post them again.
LSU player Sevyn Banks ejected for targeting as he is carried off the field on a stretcher.
Or maybe you're intentionally overlooking these examples because you don't understand the rule. I'm glad they didn't call it on Georgia last night. It's a dumb rule and I wanted UGA to win. The fact is that it was targeting by rule and it's been called that way fairly often now.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:08 am to koreandawg
Clean hit. Football's a rough and fast sport. Some targeting calls are ridiculous.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:09 am to LSUBALLER
I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy of tRant right now.
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:10 am to theRealJesseD
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:11 am to LSUBALLER
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:11 am to DrewDawg13
quote:
It’s supposed to be put your facemask in his chest. You can’t lead with the crown of the helmet for the safety of the tackler it a penalty
Do you enjoy being wrong all the time??
I love these posts. Guy quotes someone making a correct statement and asks if they enjoy being wrong.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News