Started By
Message
re: Burrow sucks more than the Browns
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:05 am to diddlydawg7
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:05 am to diddlydawg7
What does your pea size brain not get by you comparing a percentage of 12 games to 2 games?? Also no I meant what I said...arbitrary. Bengals also lost their first two games of last season.
Here let me give you a scenario, I throw the football 1 time and complete the pass. I am 1/1. I am throwing 100%. Next day I throw 70 passes and complete 68. I am throwing about 97%. Do you see how more data gives you a more accurate reading or will you only portray data that fits your agenda kind of like this world is turning into?
Here let me give you a scenario, I throw the football 1 time and complete the pass. I am 1/1. I am throwing 100%. Next day I throw 70 passes and complete 68. I am throwing about 97%. Do you see how more data gives you a more accurate reading or will you only portray data that fits your agenda kind of like this world is turning into?
1
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:10 am to Tigas96
quote:
No jackarse, you took stats from two games and tried to compare them to a stat from an entire season. That is not the way Mathematics works. Did you even get a high school diploma????????
1. You are obviously being trolled.
2. Percentages work fine with different sample sizes and math does work that way. The smaller sample size works both ways, if he wins next game he's at .333 and well over double the previous years win%.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:12 am to thatguy45
Joe was on pace to break the franchise attempts record, in his second start. Easy man. Joe will be fine.
We were 5 for 5 on 4th down conversions tonight. Balls of fricking steel Burrow is more like it.
We were 5 for 5 on 4th down conversions tonight. Balls of fricking steel Burrow is more like it.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:16 am to Tigas96
quote:
What does your pea size brain not get by you comparing a percentage of 12 games to 2 games
Bengals WP without Burrow: 0.125
Bengals WP with Burrow: 0.000
Your problem is that you are assuming that I compared the data and drew conclusions from the data. I didn’t. I listed the data so everyone can make their own conclusions based on the information at hand. Everyone knows that we’ve only played two games in 2020 but it doesn’t change the fact that their winning percentage is 0.
You are getting really upset about me providing information for everyone. You should really stop and think about what you are saying before you let the emotions get the better of you and resort to name-calling and anger.
quote:
Do you see how more data gives you a more accurate reading
It does. But I’m only listing the data we have at hand
Try not to be so angry over facts.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:16 am to 3down10
Obviously his math problem solving skills were not wrong. It is when he tried to compare two uneven sample sizes is where he screwed himself. Hence the scenario I just gave above.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:21 am to Tigas96
quote:
It is when he tried to compare two uneven sample sizes is where he screwed himself
First of all, I didn’t.
Second, even if I did, that’s how math works. It’s a small sample size, but it doesn’t make it any less true. 0/1=0/100.
It would be different if I had drawn conclusions from the data.
If I had listed the win percentages and then said that the data meant that the Bengals were better off without Burrow, that would be analytically invalid and disingenuous, but the mathematical validity does not change.
This post was edited on 9/18/20 at 12:22 am
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:23 am to diddlydawg7
Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong 
The win percentage should be even higher without Burrow. See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
The win percentage should be even higher without Burrow. See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:27 am to Tigas96
quote:
Well if that was the case, the Bengals have been around more than last season so your math is still wrong
Ok. I meant to put “2019 Bengals”
quote:
See how idiotic your arbitrary math is?
You still don’t get it. This would be an issue if I had made any conclusions. I didn’t. I’m just listing straight facts.
It’s impossible for math to be idiotic. It’s either true or not.
The conclusions you form from math can be idiotic, but not the math itself. I never even came up with any conclusions so there’s really nothing to complain about.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:28 am to diddlydawg7
Well that was on you for not saying 2019 Bengals vs 2020 bengals SO FAR. Bengals without Burrow has a win percentage over .400. Learn how to do math or learn how to label your data.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:30 am to diddlydawg7
quote:
Screens and slants
About all he has time for with that o line
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:31 am to Tigas96
quote:
Learn how to do math or learn how to label your data.
Bro your entire argument has been destroyed and you’ve decided to go with “But-but-but you made a typo”
Posted on 9/18/20 at 12:35 am to diddlydawg7
Because your data is so misleading
It does not accurately represent a damn thing. Really do not know where you wanted to go with arbitrary mathematics but do you bro.
My argument is valid. Sorry you are putting misleading stats on a board then try to cover up your wrongful math with a “forgot to put 2019 Bengals”.
It does not accurately represent a damn thing. Really do not know where you wanted to go with arbitrary mathematics but do you bro.
My argument is valid. Sorry you are putting misleading stats on a board then try to cover up your wrongful math with a “forgot to put 2019 Bengals”.
This post was edited on 9/18/20 at 12:43 am
Posted on 9/18/20 at 1:27 am to RB10
quote:
The guy who just went 300 3/0? Ok then.
Are you talking about Burrow playing against the mighty Browns?! When was the last time they won the division and were competitive yearly?
This post was edited on 9/18/20 at 1:31 am
Posted on 9/18/20 at 1:43 am to TrueLefty
quote:
Are you talking about Burrow playing against the mighty Browns?! When was the last time they won the division and were competitive yearly?
He's a rookie, who had no preseason, playing in his second NFL game on a team who went 2-14 last year. What exactly did you expect? Peyton Manning started his career 0-4 and finished the season 3-13 with 26 TDs and 28 INTs. He didn't have more TDs than INTs in a game until his 7th game of the season. Not saying Joe will be the next Peyton Manning, but to refute a guy laughing at the notion Joe "sucked" because he "only played the Browns" is ignorant.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 1:48 am to diddlydawg7
quote:
2019 winning percentage: 0.125
2020 winning percentage: 0.000
These are facts. This is exactly how math works.
You could argue that it’s too small of a sample size but you can’t tell me that my math is wrong. You sound like a moron.
The Bengals started the season 0-11 last year. Do you think Burrow will?
Posted on 9/18/20 at 2:11 am to lsufball19
quote:
Are you talking about Burrow playing against the mighty Browns?! When was the last time they won the division and were competitive yearly?
He's a rookie, who had no preseason, playing in his second NFL game on a team who went 2-14 last year. What exactly did you expect? Peyton Manning started his career 0-4 and finished the season 3-13 with 26 TDs and 28 INTs. He didn't have more TDs than INTs in a game until his 7th game of the season. Not saying Joe will be the next Peyton Manning, but to refute a guy laughing at the notion Joe "sucked" because he "only played the Browns" is ignorant.
Really? My brother-in-law is a Browns fans and told me they are not good every year. Joe is not the problem. It is the norm for Cincinnati to continue to be a non playoff team. Maybe in 2-3 years will be a playoff team. I wouldn't count on that happening because they are Cincinnati. Same thing for Cleveland.
This post was edited on 9/18/20 at 2:27 am
Posted on 9/18/20 at 2:17 am to thatguy45
Big game hunting tonight TG?
Posted on 9/18/20 at 2:37 am to Tigas96
quote:
I can see you are also bad at Mathematics. Good thing you did not go to college.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 3:12 am to RB10
Against a decent browns defense
Posted on 9/18/20 at 4:21 am to RB10
300 yards on basically 5 yards per pass attempt lol
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News