Started By
Message
re: Booger McFarland: Kirby Smart 'has done less with more maybe than Mark Richt'
Posted on 1/15/21 at 6:56 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 1/15/21 at 6:56 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Kirby has more talent by far than any team not Bama or OSU. Not on championship to show for it.
Well 3 of the last 4 seasons bama is the reason we haven't either made the playoffs or won the title soooo I guess it makes sense then
1
Posted on 1/15/21 at 6:58 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Subjective at best.
How the frick is that subjective? That's the BSC before the playoffs were played. It would have been UGA and Clemson for the championship.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 6:59 pm to ThereGoesHerschel
quote:
Well 3 of the last 4 seasons bama is the reason we haven't either made the playoffs or won the title soooo I guess it makes sense then
and the when bama got cleared out of the way due to insane injury problems before the season even started, LSU had their best team ever so it didn’t matter. That’s tough luck.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:00 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:04 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
In a BCS era configuration, the 2017 season’s BCSCG would’ve been Clemson v. Oklahoma
Please try to clarify your point here. The link you provided does nothing to illustrate your point. You're attempting to take a *human poll selection* the CFP and then back apply it to a 2 team selection era like the BCS. You can have one or the other, but not both.
In case you missed it the first time... this is the simulation of the BCS rankings at the time of the final CFP rankings release:
This post was edited on 1/15/21 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:06 pm to AlaCowboy
quote:
Gator fans can only snipe at their Daddy.
Scored 38 points in the first half against what I was told was the "best UGA defense ever"!
44-28
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:08 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
BCS era configuration, the 2017 season’s BCSCG would’ve been Clemson v. Oklahoma
What? The link doesn't give the BCS formula or "configuration" for the 2018
playoffs.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:09 pm to fibonaccisquared
quote:
Please try to clarify your point here. The link you provided does nothing to illustrate your point. You're attempting to take a *human poll selection* the CFP and then back apply it to a 2 team selection era like the BCS. You can have one or the other, but not both.
In case you missed it the first time... this is the simulation of the BCS rankings at the time of the final CFP rankings release:
Okay but you’re using a “simulation” of what the BCS may have looked like if it was used in 2017 but it didn’t exist anymore and it was tweaked almost every few years when it did exist. So, yeah, I’m going to just say that in the poll of importance 2002 was #3 and 2017 was #3 so the only material difference between the two is that 2017 got to play another game after winning a Rose Bowl and 2002 did not after winning a Sugar Bowl.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:11 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
What? The link doesn't give the BCS formula or "configuration" for the 2018
playoffs.
The BCS era configuration is #1 and #2 play in a winner take all championship game. Look at my last post as a reason why some made up guess at what the BCS would’ve looked like in 2017 is irrelevant.
I swear y’all got smooth brains
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:12 pm to GaryGator
Well, Booger isnt the smartest dude as that is proven with this hot take because he is incorrect.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:12 pm to GaryGator
quote:
GaryGator
So salty Gary.
So how does it feel to be going into year 4 with Mullen and no closer to a top 10 finish or SEC title than year one?
You already getting ready for the disaster of '21?
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:18 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Thanks to expanding to include 4 teams instead of 2. Without that #3 UGA misses it with Kirby.
Wrong about UGA AGAIN.
BCS projections had UGA at #2.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:21 pm to Tjtennispro
quote:
shite Auburn had just beat that arse 41-17 two weeks before.
In a game full of flukes that clearly didnt happen in game 2.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:22 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
The BCS era configuration is #1 and #2 play in a winner take all championship game.
And using the BCS computer rankings, the #1 vs #2 would have been Clemson vs
UGA.
How difficult is that to figure out?
quote:
BCS would’ve looked like in 2017 is irrelevant.
What? Its COMPLETELY relevant in this discussion.
Why even use the term if you don't use the formula that goes with it?
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:27 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Wrong about UGA AGAIN.
BCS projections had UGA at #2.
Read better, post less.
The simulated BCS is subjective and unreliable. It’s a best guess not an actual ranking. UGA had no quality wins and was able to dodge BAMA, lucking into a rematch against a team that already blew them out.
The end of the year ranking using the actual system in place the year they played had UGA at 3, thus missing a 1 vs 2 national championship game. CMR had a team ranked 3rd once that would have made a 4 team playoff given the ranking system the year they played.
This was already covered. Try harder.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:29 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
So how does it feel to be going into year 4 with Mullen and no closer to a top 10 finish or SEC title than year one?
It feels a helluva alot better than going 40+ years without a natty.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:30 pm to GaryGator
Booger can eat himself
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:32 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
#1 Bama -- 1, 1, 7, 1, 2
#2 UGA - 7, 3, 1, 2, 1
#3 Ohio State -- 4, 2, 2, 14, 5
#4 LSU -- 3, 7, 15, 5, 4
#5 Clemson -- 10, 16, 6, 10, 3
One of these is not like the others.
This post was edited on 1/15/21 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:41 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Read better, post less.
The simulated BCS is subjective and unreliable. It’s a best guess not an actual ranking. UGA had no quality wins and was able to dodge BAMA, lucking into a rematch against a team that already blew them out.
The end of the year ranking using the actual system in place the year they played had UGA at 3, thus missing a 1 vs 2 national championship game. CMR had a team ranked 3rd once that would have made a 4 team playoff given the ranking system the year they played.
This was already covered. Try harder.
It is difficult to get a fan to understand something when his team’s superiority depends upon his not understanding it.
Posted on 1/15/21 at 7:41 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Smart got to the national championship game. Richt never did that.
He was also gone before the playoffs. Better chance for 2 teams from the same conference that way.
Page 3 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News