Started By
Message
re: aTm fans, how often does Kyle sell out?
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:42 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:42 am to Draconian Sanctions

Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:43 am to NBamaAlum
A&M started selling out two or three years ago (prior to the SEC affect). Since that, it has consistently sold out, and there is now quite a long list for season tickets.
Prior to that, A&M lacked the branding to get "t-shirt fans," a large enough alumni base to just sell out with alumni, and was far enough from major urban areas to make it hard to sell out with locals.
Prior to that, A&M lacked the branding to get "t-shirt fans," a large enough alumni base to just sell out with alumni, and was far enough from major urban areas to make it hard to sell out with locals.
Posted on 2/26/13 at 11:44 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Yeah having a transcendent, record breaking QB influences attendance....
Yeah you know to which part of the point that statement was directed.
Posted on 2/26/13 at 12:55 pm to DWag215
Chuck Carlton and the Dallas Morning News need new researchers.
A&M had 42 sellouts at Kyle Field during the time period of 1999-2012 (14 seasons).
EDIT: Technically these are "at or above capacity" crowds. Not necessarily "sellouts".
A&M had 42 sellouts at Kyle Field during the time period of 1999-2012 (14 seasons).
EDIT: Technically these are "at or above capacity" crowds. Not necessarily "sellouts".
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:04 pm to FarmersFight
Hyman is the one who gave that stat. It's misleading because we had a ton of games above official capacity that weren't "sellouts" as well.
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:06 pm to FarmersFight
I bet the DMN got their numbers from someone within A&M AD, from part of the group that wants to keep the new stadium on the smaller side (95K or so).
If you only call it is sellout if we sold every available ticket (including scattered singles or tickets within extra areas that were opened up beyond capacity - like temporary seats on the track), then we have fewer sellouts.
If you only call it is sellout if we sold every available ticket (including scattered singles or tickets within extra areas that were opened up beyond capacity - like temporary seats on the track), then we have fewer sellouts.
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:17 pm to Bose Ikard
Ah true. I didn't take into account any "political" stuff going on at the athletic department. I will revise my stat to say that there were 42 at or above capacity crowds at Kyle from 1999-2012.
I suppose there is a material difference between a "sellout" and "above capacity crowd"
ETA: That 24 in 36 years is actually from Olin Buchanan at TexAgs.com. Carlton retweeted.
I suppose there is a material difference between a "sellout" and "above capacity crowd"
ETA: That 24 in 36 years is actually from Olin Buchanan at TexAgs.com. Carlton retweeted.
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:19 pm to FarmersFight
quote:
I didn't take into account any "political" stuff going on at the athletic department.
A little insight, por favor?
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:20 pm to Bose Ikard
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/4/23 at 10:05 am
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:20 pm to Bose Ikard
quote:
I bet the DMN got their numbers from someone within A&M AD, from part of the group that wants to keep the new stadium on the smaller side (95K or so).
The Athletic Director is that person. Hyman said that.
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:25 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
A little insight, por favor?
I have no special knowledge of anything at A&M's AD. I worded that poorly.
I would normally take stats like 24 sellouts in 36 years at face value from the Athletic Department (from the DMN is a different story, but everyone here says that number is straight from the Athletic Director).
It had not entered my mind that hypothetically there were factions that would put out contrasting numbers as part of an agenda to control stadium expansion.
Because that sounds far-fetched.
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:33 pm to Bose Ikard
This is so funny.
Now, ax yourselves, who the frick stands to BENEFIT from A&M building a SMALLER stadium?
From the NCAA average attendance:
2008 -- 14. Texas A&M -- average 82,193
2009 -- 16. Texas A&M -- 76,800
2010 -- 13. Texas A&M -- 82,477
2011 -- 10. Texas A&M -- 87,183
Capacity is at about 82,600, so we blew out capacity for 2011. I wonder what 2012 was.
Also, attendance increase from the previous year:
2008 -- No Data
2009 -- A&M not in the top 30
2010 -- 12. Texas A&M average increase of 5,677
2011 -- 13. Texas A&M average increase of 4,706
I wonder what it was for 2012. In two years we increased our average attendance by 10,000, while already at or above capacity. If that trend continues, we will need well over 100,000 seats in 10 years, and to spend 1/2 a billion dollars and not get the job done right for the long term?
Facts suck, don't they?
Again. WHO THE frick STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM A&M BUILDING A SMALLER STADIUM?
Jealous little twats are some transparent motherfrickers. It's comical at this point.
For the first time EVER, some bitches have taken a back seat. The stadium size is all they have left and that's about to get shite-canned, so they are in a spin-cycle media panic.

Now, ax yourselves, who the frick stands to BENEFIT from A&M building a SMALLER stadium?

From the NCAA average attendance:
2008 -- 14. Texas A&M -- average 82,193
2009 -- 16. Texas A&M -- 76,800
2010 -- 13. Texas A&M -- 82,477
2011 -- 10. Texas A&M -- 87,183
Capacity is at about 82,600, so we blew out capacity for 2011. I wonder what 2012 was.
Also, attendance increase from the previous year:
2008 -- No Data
2009 -- A&M not in the top 30
2010 -- 12. Texas A&M average increase of 5,677
2011 -- 13. Texas A&M average increase of 4,706
I wonder what it was for 2012. In two years we increased our average attendance by 10,000, while already at or above capacity. If that trend continues, we will need well over 100,000 seats in 10 years, and to spend 1/2 a billion dollars and not get the job done right for the long term?

Again. WHO THE frick STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM A&M BUILDING A SMALLER STADIUM?
Jealous little twats are some transparent motherfrickers. It's comical at this point.
For the first time EVER, some bitches have taken a back seat. The stadium size is all they have left and that's about to get shite-canned, so they are in a spin-cycle media panic.

Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:40 pm to Captain Insano
Every school counts differently... Some schools count concession people, security, recruits media etc to come up with these over capacity numbers... No SEC school sells SRO tix that I'm aware of, so over capacity are people working etc...
At UGA we have 92,746 tickets, those are all that's counted. I know Bama does the same with 101,821 seats.
If Bama & UGA used the methods some schools Bama would routinely be prolly 105,000 & UGA 95,000...
At UGA we have 92,746 tickets, those are all that's counted. I know Bama does the same with 101,821 seats.
If Bama & UGA used the methods some schools Bama would routinely be prolly 105,000 & UGA 95,000...
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 2/26/13 at 1:58 pm to dallasga6
The Bama game in College Station in September is going to be one hot ticket. I bet it hits prices online that eclipse the Bama/LSU game in t-town.
Posted on 2/26/13 at 2:26 pm to dallasga6
A&M's numbers vary so much because of the current craptastic design of the stadium. We throw seats on the old track and in temporary bleachers that aren't official capacity but are revenue bearing tickets. The new Kyle will eliminate all of that. That's not to say we can't still count folks in the press box or whatever but it won't vary the attendance as greatly as it has. We actually pushed above 90k for the Nebraska game in '10 by breaking fire codes and putting way too many people on the track which resulted in the mass of folks on the field immediately after the game. It made for a great scene but it could have been very dangerous and thus they won't let capacity get over about 87,500 until the rebuild.
I think the "politics" going on is you have some folks with different views on the capacity of the stadium. Some think 95k would be fine and leave the option to add on later. The thought process is you increase demand and virtually guarantee sellouts. Others think we go big now while interest rates are low so you aren't doing a very expensive addition in 10 years. You may not sell out every game immediately but you will eventually and in the meantime you sell out the big games now and Kyle is "done" for a good long while. You have economic arguments on both sides and lots of history of attendance on both sides. There is also some argument that some of this is about tempering expectations for those that want Kyle to be 150k or to motivate folks who are supportive but haven't yet voted with their wallets yet by committing to a major donation.
The momentum has been with the "bigger" crowd but in the end the BoR vote in May will tell the tale, that is when everything will be officially approved.
I think the "politics" going on is you have some folks with different views on the capacity of the stadium. Some think 95k would be fine and leave the option to add on later. The thought process is you increase demand and virtually guarantee sellouts. Others think we go big now while interest rates are low so you aren't doing a very expensive addition in 10 years. You may not sell out every game immediately but you will eventually and in the meantime you sell out the big games now and Kyle is "done" for a good long while. You have economic arguments on both sides and lots of history of attendance on both sides. There is also some argument that some of this is about tempering expectations for those that want Kyle to be 150k or to motivate folks who are supportive but haven't yet voted with their wallets yet by committing to a major donation.
The momentum has been with the "bigger" crowd but in the end the BoR vote in May will tell the tale, that is when everything will be officially approved.
Posted on 2/26/13 at 3:01 pm to aggressor
per the NCAA you can count attendance one of three ways. Which do y'all use...
quote:
Attendance figures for official box scores and/or NCAA reports can be calculated by #1, turnstile count(total number of people in stadium including but not limited to, tickets sold, participants, employees & gratis entry), #2, actual tickets sold or #3, an estimate by the host school when turnstile or tickets sold quantity isn't available.
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 2/26/13 at 3:06 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
KaiserSoze99
wtf are you going on about?
and why are you wondering what 2012 was when you can easily average the numbers already given in this thread? (its 87,114 btw)
as for building a "smaller" stadium...
there is a legit argument for keeping it under 100k. CFB attendance has actually gone down (as has NFL BTW) over the last several years. The factors are debatable but the fact is more and more people would rather watch at home b/c they can now get every single game.
just b/c we have had a spike recently doesn't mean we can handle adding 20k more seats.
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 2/26/13 at 3:22 pm to Dr RC
The factors are NOT debatable. It's a shrinking economy that is effecting ALL sporting events. That doesn't seem to effect A&M. Demand is definitely there. Don't sit there and act like it's not.
If we're gonna dump HALF A BILLION frickING DOLLARS into a revamp job, somebody needs to be projecting the future over the next 30 years. Our alum base is one of the fastest growing in the U.S. Is NOBODY thinking about that, and the 10,000 new ones we graduate every year? Surely our AD has considered that issue, right?
If the AD is making projections, I want to see them. What are they? Over how long a period of time? Will it be cheaper to do all the renovation in a short period of time or wait until demand is way up in 5 years?
If we're gonna dump HALF A BILLION frickING DOLLARS into a revamp job, somebody needs to be projecting the future over the next 30 years. Our alum base is one of the fastest growing in the U.S. Is NOBODY thinking about that, and the 10,000 new ones we graduate every year? Surely our AD has considered that issue, right?
If the AD is making projections, I want to see them. What are they? Over how long a period of time? Will it be cheaper to do all the renovation in a short period of time or wait until demand is way up in 5 years?
Posted on 2/26/13 at 3:39 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
The factors are NOT debatable. It's a shrinking economy that is effecting ALL sporting events. That doesn't seem to effect A&M. Demand is definitely there. Don't sit there and act like it's not.
sure, right now it hasn't hurt A&M. However, you cannot simply look at the last two years and assume its always going to be that way. In 2011 we started the year ranked top 10 and it was our final year in the Big 12. In 2012 it was our first year in the SEC and that drummed up a ton of excitement. You could easily argue the last two years are an aberration and that if the team starts to suck again would could go back to 2006 type numbers.
quote:
If we're gonna dump HALF A BILLION frickING DOLLARS into a revamp job, somebody needs to be projecting the future over the next 30 years. Our alum base is one of the fastest growing in the U.S. Is NOBODY thinking about that, and the 10,000 new ones we graduate every year? Surely our AD has considered that issue, right?
Of course its being considered. But they are also considering other factors that could negatively impact attendance. You can't simply say our alum base is getting bigger ergo we need more seats. It just doesn't work that way. You have to consider things like TV having a negative impact. Worse still, you could have so many seats that people stop buying season ticket packages b/c they know it'll be easy to find tickets on game day. Sometimes scarcity of tickets is a good thing.
Its also possible that instead of adding more seats for Joe Shmoe it would be more profitable to use that space for box and club seating. Thats where the real money is anyway. A single Thurston Howell in his box is worth 100 Billy Bobs outside.
quote:
If the AD is making projections, I want to see them. What are they? Over how long a period of time? Will it be cheaper to do all the renovation in a short period of time or wait until demand is way up in 5 years?
Well you don't get to see them. And just because it may be cheaper to build bigger now doesn't we we should.
Popular
Back to top
