Started By
Message
Arkansas, Missouri, Texas A&M....
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:37 pm
Each has won a Big 3 National Championship.
Texas A&M - 1939 football
Missouri - 1954 baseball
Arkansas - 1994 basketball
Which program is most likely to win a Big 3 NC next, and what sport?
Texas A&M - 1939 football
Missouri - 1954 baseball
Arkansas - 1994 basketball
Which program is most likely to win a Big 3 NC next, and what sport?
6
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:38 pm to Oklahomey
Almost subtle enough, almost.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:40 pm to Oklahomey
Georgia is still running on your poor, dirt farming arse
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:41 pm to Oklahomey
Most likely would be Arkansas baseball. 2nd is A&M football
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:42 pm to Oklahomey
41-13 bitch
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:47 pm to Oklahomey
quote:
Texas A&M - 1939 football
No.
And before he shows, shut up Korin
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:51 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
quote:
Texas A&M - 1939 football
No.
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:52 pm to Hugh McElroy
I said
quote:
No
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:52 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Oh, I see now. You're a moron.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:55 pm to Hugh McElroy
No
Posted on 5/19/18 at 7:56 pm to Hugh McElroy
77-0 still has a greater scar on the Aggies.
Since OU lost to Aggy in the Cotton Bowl, Sooners have won 3 XII titles and made 2 CFP appearances. Meanwhile, Aggy has yet to accomplish much since Johnny Canada.
Since OU lost to Aggy in the Cotton Bowl, Sooners have won 3 XII titles and made 2 CFP appearances. Meanwhile, Aggy has yet to accomplish much since Johnny Canada.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:00 pm to Oklahomey
Why does Oklahoma have more players on its roster from The Great State than from Oklahoma?
If I was an Okie tax-payer, that’d be a bitter pill to swallow.
Or does Oak State just pull the better in-state kids?
If I was an Okie tax-payer, that’d be a bitter pill to swallow.
Or does Oak State just pull the better in-state kids?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:02 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:08 pm to EKG
You shouldn’t be worried since you never lo$$ in-state recruiting battles to OU, correct?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:12 pm to NoMansLand
Not worried at all, mate.
Just genuinely curious.
Maybe our Texas HS coaches could offer a coaching clinic to the OK HS coaches?
We are neighbors, after all.
Just genuinely curious.
Maybe our Texas HS coaches could offer a coaching clinic to the OK HS coaches?
We are neighbors, after all.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:21 pm to EKG
To answer your question OU has always recruited Texas well. OU almost always has recruited well nationally. Yes a State with less than 4M population does typically produce less D1 recruits than a state with more than 28M. So no reason NOT to recruit Texas.
So why do you think A&M had to go to the SEC-money? Shouldn’t be better competition since they didn’t regularly win the Big XII anyway.
So why do you think A&M had to go to the SEC-money? Shouldn’t be better competition since they didn’t regularly win the Big XII anyway.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:26 pm to NoMansLand
quote:
So why do you think A&M had to go to the SEC-money? Shouldn’t be better competition since they didn’t regularly win the Big XII anyway.
We didn’t “have to go to the SEC;” we wanted to.
Have wanted to for decades.
Culture, pageantry, growth for our program ... name a metric, and the SEC variable was better for us.
So when they extended the invitation, it was a no-brainer—like finally coming home, really.
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:39 pm to EKG
No
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:47 pm to NoMansLand
quote:
why do you think A&M had to go to the SEC
Because we were invited?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 8:47 pm to EKG
quote:
Culture, pageantry, growth for our program
Wow. We come from 2 totally different fan bases. I can only think of 3 meaningful things about conference affiliation:
1. Championships (conference and getting your team in a position for national).
9. Money. Because you can’t sustain championships without getting top recruits without having top facilities.
10. Conference-level prestige (educational), then to a lesser extent athletic. Sure you need the teams you play against to be competitive, but how does chanting SEC get YOUR team any better.
Back to your reasons:
1. Culture. You go to A&M, not Bama. Unless you want to go to grad school somewhere else in conference or hope that a future employer is an “SEC” fan, I just don’t get it.
2. Pageantry. I guess road games are nice. But most home fans in the SEC are as rude to visitors as any other conference. You also don’t get to claim Bama’s football/Kentucky’s basketball hardware when all you do is lose or play competitively to them.
3. Growth for your program. I know it’s only been 6 years, at what point will you start having tangible results? I don’t follow A&M recruiting (obviously), but has signees from other SEC states picked up? Obviously Texas is now more heavily recruited by the SEC than before.
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 9:00 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News