Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:35 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Actually Arkansas is 7th in the SEC since joining.
How about since Petrino has arrived? Also, I wonder how well Bama or LSU would have done in 10 years under Nutt?
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:36 pm to roadGator
quote:
roadGator
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:36 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Yes, but he man who brought you your most recent division title, most recent SEC title, most recent BCS bowl win, most recent BCSMNC win, was.
Division titles don't mean anything and his last SEC title/BCS win was 10 seasons before he was fired.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:39 pm to SunHog
quote:
We are doing it in the hardest division in the hardest league in history.
Auburn, LSU, and Bama have all won SEC and national titles in the hardest division in the hardest league in history. Arkansas hasnt done shite since they have joined it. You cannot compare them.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:41 pm to Swagga
LSU and Auburn have only won when the division, conference and FBS level of football have been down.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:43 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
LSU and Auburn have only won when the division, conference and FBS level of football have been down.
Still puts them ahead of Arkansas.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:46 pm to ohiovol
Meanwhile, an up SEC means a losing season and no bowl for Tennessee.
Bad news is the SEC appears to be strong again this upcoming season.
Bite the pillow, the SEC is going in dry.
Bad news is the SEC appears to be strong again this upcoming season.
Bite the pillow, the SEC is going in dry.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:47 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Meanwhile, an up SEC means a losing season and no bowl for Tennessee.
Bad news is the SEC appears to be strong again this upcoming season.
Bite the pillow, the SEC is going in dry.
An up SEC means no SEC title for Arkansas.
But to be fair, a down SEC season also means no SEC title for Arkansas.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 5:55 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
LSU and Auburn have only won when the division, conference and FBS level of football have been down.
so whats Arkansas's excuse? Just not getting it done I guess 
Posted on 1/27/12 at 6:00 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
21-5 in two years over the past 2 years...
Granted these are some of the wins included in that 21:
Tennessee Tech
ULM
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
UTEP
Missouri State
New Mexico
Troy
Ole Miss again
That's 9 gimme wins, and I won't count Vandy this year because they were at least respectable. Hell, you could count Tennessee in there twice because they are so down to make it 11 gimmes. So against even decent competition: (MissState, LSU, Bama, Auburn, SouthCarolina, Georgia, TexasA&M, OhioState, KState) They are 10-5 over the past two years...still very respectable, but 10-5 against top 25 competition isn't going to get you to "ELITE" status...
Posted on 1/27/12 at 6:21 pm to NWLATigerFan12
Bama-2
LSU-1
Auburn(championship year)-1
OhioState(Sugar Bowl)-1
Those were all eventual top 10 teams. The worst loss was the first Bama Loss. That is the only only one that really hurts our resume.
LSU-1
Auburn(championship year)-1
OhioState(Sugar Bowl)-1
Those were all eventual top 10 teams. The worst loss was the first Bama Loss. That is the only only one that really hurts our resume.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 6:24 pm to NWLATigerFan12
quote:
That's 9 gimme wins, and I won't count Vandy this year because they were at least respectable. Hell, you could count Tennessee in there twice because they are so down to make it 11 gimmes. So against even decent competition: (MissState, LSU, Bama, Auburn, SouthCarolina, Georgia, TexasA&M, OhioState, KState) They are 10-5 over the past two years...still very respectable, but 10-5 against top 25 competition isn't going to get you to "ELITE" status...
Tennessee only played Arkansas once the last two years.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 6:27 pm to roadGator
quote:
Semi-legit but needs to be on the recruiting board.
Could have gone either way in my opinion. It's about the arkansas program. However it did seem to focus on our recruiting.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 6:49 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
LSU and Auburn have only won when the division, conference and FBS level of football have been down.
Oh really?? Id like to hear more about this....
Posted on 1/27/12 at 7:00 pm to npt817
I can't stand how Arkansas fans like to claim to be at the top despite never having won anything worth a damn. Those same fans will tell me that Bama is more successful here recently b/c they have more national championships (nevermind that this logic puts Arkansas in the bottom half of CFB teams). Is it so hard to wait until you win the SEC to claim success? (13 years is a long time, so I can kind of understand). You're not on the level of Bama, LSU, UF, or Auburn yet, and you just need to stop dodging the facts and come to terms with reality
Posted on 1/27/12 at 7:03 pm to Choctaw Hog
quote:
Also, I wonder how well Bama or LSU would have done in 10 years under Nutt?
By the same token, I wonder how LSU or Bama would have faired in the cupcake laiden Southwest Conference. I would bet either would have had multiple 10 win seasons as well.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 7:06 pm to southarktiger
Cupcake laden?
The SEC used to be considered 3 or 4 best behind the SWC. Revisionist history is awesome.
The SEC used to be considered 3 or 4 best behind the SWC. Revisionist history is awesome.
Posted on 1/27/12 at 7:09 pm to sms151t
quote:
Cupcake laden?
Rice, Baylor, TCU (before they were respectable), Texas Tech, Houston, and SMU ( before they paid players.......
Posted on 1/27/12 at 7:12 pm to southarktiger
Baylor in 80's was very good
Rice, Tech TCU when Whacker didn't pay people, were gimmies. Nice try look at Vandy, MSU, UK, and UT before Majors and UF before Pell tell me about cupcakes.
It works both ways
Rice, Tech TCU when Whacker didn't pay people, were gimmies. Nice try look at Vandy, MSU, UK, and UT before Majors and UF before Pell tell me about cupcakes.
It works both ways
This post was edited on 1/27/12 at 7:14 pm
Page 7 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News