Started By
Message

re: Alabama players prayed with/for our president

Posted on 4/12/18 at 9:37 am to
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17776 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Who carried the cross?


Where does that say that only Simon carried the cross?

Again, that doesn't oppose any other Gospel.

Discrepancy in accounts or translations? sure
Contradiction? nope

And again, not pertinent to the resulting crucifixion

This is like the translations which say Jonah was swallowed by a whale, while some say fish. Not at all relevant to he story



Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21698 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 9:46 am to
quote:

This is like the translations which say Jonah was swallowed by a whale, while some say fish. Not at all relevant to he story


Let me say again, I'm not disputing the overall story (here). I'm pointing out contradictions in the bible.

If you want to pretend that this isn't a contradiction, would you like to move on to another? Want to tell me who first visited Jesus' tomb?

A. The two Mary's
B. The two Mary's and Solome
C. The two Marys, Joanna, and the others with them
D. Only Mary Magdalene
E. All of the above

Pick E, because they're all correct depending on which book of the bible you're in.

You can say none of this matters. But, then you expect me to believe people who can't get simple details correct in their stories are writing the word of God, from God, and I'm supposed to base my entire life around it? It's not even a well-written myth.
This post was edited on 4/12/18 at 9:51 am
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58923 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Yes, science does change and evolve as we learn more. However, we don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Just because it was wrong about a small portion of some theory, doesn't mean the whole theory was wrong.

And yet because there are disagreements among religions people want to do just that.
quote:

As I'm sure you know, Nebraska Man was never fully accepted by the scientific community, and the proposed new species was retracted in about 5 years.
When i was in the 9th grade, my 9th grade science teacher had the Evolutionary Chart hanging on the back wall. It included the Nebraska man and several other hoaxes perpetrated by the Evolutionary scientific community. Those hoaxes were started by "Scientists". granted many of those were also proven false and removed by the scientific community, but the fact remains many of them were taught as a part of the evolutionary chain in our schools. Some were hailed as Missing Links.

Scientists and researches depend upon governmental and private funding to continue their research. That alone introduces biases to research and greater chances for fraud and false/created data.

You can see this in Climate Change, just to name one area of science. The two biggest scientific areas of fraud has been in evolution and Pharmaceutical research for these very reasons.

Here are a couple of links discussing scientific fraud:

LINK

LINK

In the second link there is an article about Duke University being sued for millions because of fraudulent data. The scientific community tries to guard against it, but it is still out there and not as uncommon as many would like to believe. Our problem today is colleges have taught their students that science is incorruptable and should be trusted in all things.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21698 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 9:55 am to
quote:

When i was in the 9th grade


In the early 1900's the Model T was a marvel of innovation. We've since built upon that. But, mass produced vehicles are still great.

I don't know what your links are supposed to prove. Nobody claims science in infallible or that there's no corruption in any part of it. But, I'll trust real science over myths and "I just feel it in my heart" any day.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58923 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 9:58 am to
quote:

You can say none of this matters. But, then you expect me to believe people who can't get simple details correct in their stories are writing the word of God, from God, and I'm supposed to base my entire life around it? It's not even a well-written myth.

Aren't you the one that just said that just because a small portion of a theory was wrong doesn't make the whole theory wrong? yet you want every detail in every book of the Bible to match up exactly or it is a well written myth? Seems rather hypocritical.

You misunderstand how the Bible was written. We believe it is the wholly inspired Word of God. That does not mean that God wrote the Bible word for word, but he inspired the writer. While He directed them what to say, they said it with their own words. One writer might not put every single detail down, while another would.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58923 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 9:59 am to
quote:

In the early 1900's the Model T was a marvel of innovation. We've since built upon that. But, mass produced vehicles are still great.

I don't know what your links are supposed to prove. Nobody claims science in infallible or that there's no corruption in any part of it. But, I'll trust real science over myths and "I just feel it in my heart" any day.




I just find it odd that you hold science to a much lower standard than you do God, yet you do not believe God.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Are you saying a basic value for life and morals are better or even as good today as they were 150 years ago?

I don't think they are any worse than they were 150 years ago.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17776 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:04 am to
quote:

You can say none of this matters


It's the story of the Son of God being laid to rest and rising from the tomb, atoning for all of our sins.

And I'm supposed to care which person was written to be the first one down the road? Sorry, doesn't matter to me at all.



And I'm trying to find a mention of someone being first. The first day, the first light.....some names are mentioned first, but not as definitely being the first people to the tomb. Again, that's not a contradiction

ETA: thank you for this discussion. I appreciate someone who is obviously intelligent and educated sharing their view.
This post was edited on 4/12/18 at 10:11 am
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58923 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:11 am to
quote:

I don't think they are any worse than they were 150 years ago.

Okay, then. I guess there is no use discussing that line any further.
I would argue that per capita drug abuse/addiction, murder, theft, rape and other crimes are occurring at a higher rate. However, if you think they have not, then so be it.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58923 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:13 am to
I said this subject should probably og away because of a lack of progress, and allowed myself to be drawn back in. I apologize. I think I will bow out as quietly as I can now.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:24 am to
quote:

I would argue that per capita drug abuse/addiction, murder, theft, rape and other crimes are occurring at a higher rate. However, if you think they have not, then so be it.

I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about things like morals.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21698 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I just find it odd that you hold science to a much lower standard than you do God, yet you do not believe God.




I don't think that's odd at all. I acknowledge that science is just educated people doing research. God is supposed to be the all-knowing, never-failing ruler of the universe. You'd think he could get some better writers to do his biography.

And, with that, I'm bowing out too. I've butted my head against this wall enough times that I should know better than to get sucked in.

This post was edited on 4/12/18 at 10:28 am
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
4326 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Are you saying a basic value for life and morals are better or even as good today as they were 150 years ago? Things were not great or even good 150 years ago. They never have been and they never will be. But if your argument is things are as good or better morally than they were 150 years ago, there might be an awful lot of people that would argue that point with you.


I am saying that there is at least more freedom in the world today and less violence and discrimination perpetrated by those in power. That’s all I really care about. A lot of what people consider moral is up to the individual and not something I care much about.

I don’t care about some 30 y/o looking at boobs on the Internet when that wasn’t even possible 150 years ago. I don’t care about gay marriage, cheating spouses, gambling, etc., that many of the highly religious care about. But I do care about people facing systematic discrimination, violence, or being shipped off to war.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17776 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:40 am to
quote:

A lot of what people consider moral is up to the individual and not something I care much about.


Sames. I hate using the term, "morals", because very seldom are they defined. The morals of which culture? In what era?

I bet the Khan was a very moral man according to the Mongols values and beliefs. Catapulting dead bodies, infected with the Black Death, into Kaffa was probably seen as a justified action by the Golden Horde
This post was edited on 4/12/18 at 10:45 am
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:47 am to
Yeah. 150 years ago, we just ended our deadliest war, which was fought largely in part over the ability to own slaves. Blacks couldn't vote, women couldn't vote. I doubt that the raping of slaves was being accurately reported. A husband beating his wife was just him teaching her a lesson. Child labor laws were nonexistent. Etc., etc.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17776 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 10:55 am to
quote:

150 years ago, we just ended our deadliest war


I was obsessed with Native American cultures for a while. They were all lumped in as "injuns" and referred to as savages. Many tribes had strict moral codes that they adhered to much more than the US soldiers who were fighting them. The codes were just different
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6855 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 4:09 pm to
Trotter, I know we've gone around about this on the SEC Rant OT a few times, but let me ask you an honest question: Why do you feel compelled to argue against someone's beliefs?

It seems you struggle with acceptance.

Is Christianity so unacceptable to you, that it prevents you from having peace of mind? Does the fact that billions of people place all of their hope in Jesus seem so illogical and unreasonable to you that simply have to force them to see reason and logic? It seems you can have no serenity until you've argued against every case for Christ. That's a lot of time and effort to dispute something you don't even believe in.

Christianity is not logical. It teaches that everything in and of this world is contrary to the nature of God. Everything the world holds in esteem is detested by God. It asks us to believe, with certainty, what can't be seen, heard or touched.

But this is the very definition of "faith".

We don't know how or why we were chosen. He chose us, we didn't chose Him.

If you ever feel convicted of sin, or of being a sinner, study Jesus and His message. Don't get tripped up by all the clutter:
* Evil committed in His name by people proclaiming to be Christian.
* Indisputable, scientific proof of God's existence (there isn't any. He resides in and outside of space/time).
* Hypocrites in the church (they're everywhere).

Focus on the message.

It's about a relationship, not religion.





Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
4326 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Trotter, I know we've gone around about this on the SEC Rant OT a few times, but let me ask you an honest question: Why do you feel compelled to argue against someone's beliefs?


I will debate just about any topic.

quote:

That’s a lot of time and effort to dispute something you don’t even believe in.


1. Pretty much everything we discuss on this board (religion, sports, politics, etc.) is a waste of time.

2. Just because someone doesn’t believe in something doesn’t mean it can’t affect them. I am sure you know Christianity is a powerful political force in this country and many adherents would love to legislate certain aspects of their beliefs or morality onto the general population.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30600 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 4:32 pm to
I'm also done with this thread, but I'd really like to hear why The men who were WITH Jesus and SAW the miracles he performed (the apostles) did not deny that he was the Messiah and save their own lives instead of suffering horrible deaths. Some of the naysayers on this board surely have the answer.
• Simon, AKA Peter: Simon-Peter, who was appointed by Jesus the leader of the new sect, is viewed by Roman Catholics as the first pope, was eventually martyred in Rome during the reign of the emperor Nero. As the story goes, Peter asked to be crucified upside down, so that his death would not be the equal of Jesus and the Romans supposedly obliged.

• Andrew: According to 15th Century religious historian Dorman Newman, Andrew—the brother of Peter—went to Patras in western Greece in 69 AD, where the Roman proconsul Aegeates debated religion with him. Aegeates tried to convince Andrew to forsake Christianity, so that he would not have to torture and execute him. But when that didn’t work, apparently he decided to give Andrew the full treatment. Andrew was scourged, and then tied rather than nailed to a cross, so that he would suffer for a longer time before dying. Andrew lived for two days, during which he preached to passersby.

• James (son of Zebedee, AKA James the Greater): Acts 12:1-19 says that James was killed with a sword. The newly-appointed governor of Judea, Herod Agrippa, decided to ingratiate himself with the Romans by persecuting leaders of the new sect. After James was arrested and led to place of execution, his unnamed accuser was moved by his courage. He not only repented and converted on the spot, but asked to be executed alongside James. The Roman executioners obliged, and both men were beheaded simultaneously.

• John: John was the only one of the original disciples not to die a violent death. Instead, he passed away peacefully in Patmos in his old age, sometime around 100 AD.

• Philip: Philip, the first of Jesus’ disciples, became a missionary in Asia. Eventually, he traveled to the Egyptian city of Heliopolis, where he was scourged, thrown into prison, and crucified in 54 AD.

• Bartholomew: Bartholomew supposedly preached in several countries, including India, where he translated the Gospel of Matthew for believers. In one account, “impatient idolaters” beat Bartholomew and then crucified him, while in another, he was skinned alive and then beheaded.

• Thomas: Apparently Thomas preached the gospel in Greece and India, where he angered local religious authorities, who martyred him by running him through with a spear.

• Matthew: According to legend, the former tax collector turned missionary was martyred in Ethiopia, where he was supposedly stabbed in the back by an swordsman sent by King Hertacus, after he criticized the king’s morals.

• James (son of Alphaeus, AKA James the Less): According to Foxe, James, who was elected by his fellow believers to head the churches of Jerusalem, was one of the longest-lived apostles, perhaps exceeded only by John. At the age of 94, he was beaten and stoned by persecutors, and then killed him by hitting him in the head with a club.

• Thaddaeus, AKA Lebbaeus, Judas or Jude: According to several stories, he was crucified at Edessa (the name of cities in both Turkey and Greece) in 72 AD.

• Simon the Canaanite AKA the Zealot: Simon preached in Mauritania on the west coast of Africa, and then went to England, where he was crucified in 74 AD.

At different times and in different places, not ONE of them denied him to save themselves....that's all the proof I need.

This post was edited on 4/12/18 at 4:40 pm
Posted by RichardCranium
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Member since Aug 2005
2438 posts
Posted on 4/12/18 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Prayer is man’s greatest delusion. It’s only power is as a placebo.

“Two hands hard at work are worth a thousand clasped in prayer.”


Um I'll just stand over here away from the Giant Fire engulfed hole about to swallow you.

No one is making you believe friend but ill tell you one thing. You better be right.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter