Started By
Message
re: Alabama claims 3 titles that aren't even recognized by NCAA & in the '80's, claimed 5 more
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:03 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:03 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
So we aren't claiming 5,
You Gumps really DO lack reading comprehension skills. I'll leave you in your ignorance. It's more fun this way.
2
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:03 pm to JetDawg
Fine. Take those three away. UGA will still never catch Bama.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:05 pm to JetDawg
quote:
You Gumps really DO lack reading comprehension skills.
We claim 18
The NCAA records you are using as your baseline say we have 23.
In conclusion, the NCAA records book says we are not claiming 5 titles. Unless you are saying the NCAA record book shouldn't be used, which wouldn't line up with this entire thread so far.
quote:
UGA has 6 titles recognized by the NCAA, but only claims 2.
The UGA Athletic Dept. needs to get with it and do what everybody else is doing....claim'em ALL!!
Using that rational, you are saying Alabama should claim 23.
This post was edited on 7/9/21 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:07 pm to KingOfTheWorld
quote:
UGA will still never catch Bama.
In stupidity, you are correct. We will NEVER catch Bama.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:11 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Alabama has won 2 more national titles in the last 10 years (5 - 2011, 2012, 2015, 2017, 2020) than any other SEC school has in their entire history.
Alabama has won more AP national championships in the past 5 years than Georgia has in their entire history.
Alabama has cost Georgia more national championships in the past decade than Georgia has won in their entire history.
This post was edited on 7/9/21 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:12 pm to JetDawg
quote:
Recognized" titles are those titles the NCAA lists in their "NCAA OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK". It's a very thick record book, you know, the kind made of paper!??
I know it well, why didn't you link it?
quote:
All their "recognized" national champions are listed online, too, if you're smart enough to look it up properly.
But, since the Gumps aren't smart enough, here.... LINK
Wait, why are you talking about the "very thick record book" published by the NCAA and then turn around and linking Wikipedia?
Why wouldn't you just link the "very thick record book"? They have this thing called a pdf and they can use it to put things like "very thick record books" in digital format so they can be put on the internet. You want to see it? (Careful it is very thick):
Very Thick NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision Recordbook
As was pointed out to you earlier, it lists Georgia with 6 like you said, but it lists Alabama with 23. So Georgia doesn't claim 4 that the NCAA "recognizes" and Alabama doesn't claim 5 that the NCAA "recognizes." Now what do you want to talk about?
This thread is hilarious.
quote:
Typical Bama dumbness.
quote:
You Gumps really DO lack reading comprehension skills. I'll leave you in your ignorance. It's more fun this way.
Indeed.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:12 pm to JetDawg
If you want to go by what the NCAA lists then I hope everyone is fine with Alabama claiming 23 now.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:13 pm to elposter
I say we only use AP & Coaches Poll titles to make sure we aren't giving away free titles.
Georgia has now dropped from 2 to 1.
Whoops.
Georgia has now dropped from 2 to 1.
Whoops.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:15 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
I say we only use AP & Coaches Poll titles to make sure we aren't giving away free titles.
Georgia has now dropped from 2 to 1.
Whoops.
Let's ask that JetDawg guy. I hear he is really smart.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:16 pm to JetDawg
quote:
Typical Bama dumbness. "Recognized" titles are those titles the NCAA lists in their "NCAA OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK". It's a very thick record book, you know, the kind made of paper!?? It's a printed copy of all their football record-keeping. All their "recognized" national champions are listed online, too, if you're smart enough to look it up properly.
But, since the Gumps aren't smart enough, here.... LINK
If you Bama fans knew anything, you'd know what is meant by "NCAA recognized." Stupid Gumps.
There is no official record book of FBS national championships by the NCAA. If there is, I'd like to see it.
What you do see from time to time are lists that appear on the NCAA website. But that stuff is just done by different NCAA authors/editors and is certainly not anything close to being an "official" list. They'll list just about anything anyone claims half the time. Suddenly even BCS computers are listed for teams as selectors.
You linked to a wiki page after claiming the NCAA. Not sure why.
I've heard the term "NCAA recognized" for the past 15 years online. It's always done by people who don't have a clue what role the NCAA has in FBS college football, which is absolutely none. They keep game stats and records is about it.
If you want to talk about what the NCAA recognizes in college football, you better start looking towards FCS and lower divisions.
In reality, Alabama has 1 claim it shouldn't have and that is 1941. All the other claims fit directly to their era and the way national champions were determined in that area.
Now, let this dumbass gump tell you what is legit.
Pre 1936 you have the math poll/Rose Bowl era. You'll see claims of 4 and 5 teams or more every year in this era. Basically all of them done retroactive before 1930ish. Someone put out a math poll in 1930ish, and then Knute Rockne ask them to go back in time so he could claim retro ones.
In 1936 the Poll Era begins with the AP. It's a bit biased for many years, but after 1935 it is no longer valid to claim a math poll. This is why Alabama's 1941 claim isn't legit, despite the math poll selector. The coaches poll comes about 15 years later, and those are legit as well.
From 1936 until the start of the BCS, you can claim any of those 2 polls and it's legit.
Then you have BCS era, and now we have the playoff era. AKA USC using the AP poll to claim 2004 is a bullshite claim.
Using this method, Alabama loses 1 title. What about Georgia?
But sure, let's pretend the NCAA has a method of "recognizing" national titles.
This post was edited on 7/9/21 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:18 pm to JetDawg
1980
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:19 pm to JetDawg
quote:
You Gumps really DO lack reading comprehension skills. I'll leave you in your ignorance. It's more fun this way.
Is now about the time when you pull the "Jokes on you, I was only trolling" line out?
This post was edited on 7/9/21 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:20 pm to JetDawg
quote:
But, since the Gumps aren't smart enough, here.... LINK
Well hell ,that even counts 1941 for Alabama
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:23 pm to JetDawg
quote:
JetDawg
Muh 1980.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:26 pm to elposter
Stupid as this sounds, I try to put myself in OP's shoes. What led to creation of the thread, why specifically ALABAMA?
I just figured he was scrolling through Georgia highlights on YouTube. That tricky recommendations algorithms was on his videos list then he accidentally clicks 2 and 26 after watching the Oklahoma game.
I just figured he was scrolling through Georgia highlights on YouTube. That tricky recommendations algorithms was on his videos list then he accidentally clicks 2 and 26 after watching the Oklahoma game.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:32 pm to elposter
quote:
Let's ask that JetDawg guy. I hear he is really smart.
Jetdawg:
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:43 pm to Nitro Express
OP after his stupid thread crashed and burned.
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:44 pm to JetDawg
quote:
We could claim it if we did it "the Alabama way!"
Uh no you can’t. Weekly Reader never even gave you frickers a title
Posted on 7/9/21 at 5:54 pm to JetDawg
This is the best melt of the week.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News