Started By
Message

re: A Pro SEC Attorney is Defending LSU and Lane Kiffin

Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37733 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Louisiana governor has always "controlled" LSU to varying degrees.



Yeah

With the exception of Vanderbilt all of the SEC schools are beholden to their state governments and courts.

And certainly federal and state legislatures and courts have meddled many times before. Chambliss seems like a recent obvious and somewhat egregious example. He's there in spite of SEC and NCAA rulings.
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
14305 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Can you link the lawsuit that LSU filed?
They had their NFL players in court to become eligible there.

quote:

LSU also complied every step of the way regarding SEC rules.
If they had complied then they would have told the players to get lost to start with.
Posted by D500MAG
Oklahoma
Member since Oct 2010
4089 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

If I was in yall's situation I would just go back to France and never be heard from again.



Go back? We were here before any american or any of you sister frickers
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3693 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

In this case - transferring publicly owned funds to private shareholders - not only should they be sanctioned, people should be arrested when/if it happens.



Ppppffffttt... like this isn't already happening at every institution in Alabama...

And ya'll think we are Naive

Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4461 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:08 pm to
That guy was famously wrong about the acc vs unc Clem fsu(which was his claim to fame). I wouldn’t use this guy as reference
Posted by Dotarian
Midwest
Member since Oct 2012
1775 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

The First Amendment claim the SEC is making in that filing is the right to free association.
Maybe, but it's a BS claim, and the 1A isn't applicable to the SEC's position.

Pretending to be a good-old boy club that has a right to decide who gets to be a member is all well and good - until that club starts acting like a business, signing huge contracts on behalf of the club with external parties that bind both the club AND it's specific members to contractual obligations, and also committing to member obligations for compensation from those outside arrangements.

The SEC isn't a big private club - it's a business, one that has made legally binding obligations both outside of and within its membership. And that, unfortunately for the SEC, is exactly what they've been working towards for the last 20 years - maximum revenue. Well, now they have it, and it's the rope that will be used to hang them if they go after LSU because Sankey is butthurt with no actual transgression by LSU.

Sankey can't have his cake and eat it too. He doesn't get to pretend to be a private club and also act like a business enterprise engaging in commerce with contractual obligations.

Kick LSU out at your own risk, Sankey. The countersuits by both the students in question, the school, the state, and other injured parties will bankrupt the SEC. Not to mention what the Mouse might have to say about breaking the contractual obligations for the product they paid billions for.

Posted by pgaddxn
between here and there
Member since Jul 2008
2767 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:13 pm to
We are the only free thinking true patriots left in this conference.

Why do you think the rest of these commies are targeting us so bad?
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
26465 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Ppppffffttt... like this isn't already happening at every institution in Alabama...


Everything in an LSU fan’s life is measured against Alabama.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
23337 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

In this case - transferring publicly owned funds to private shareholders - not only should they be sanctioned, people should be arrested when/if it happens.


This is what, the third or fourth time you've changed your position on what this whole thing is about?

At first, it was: LSU just needs to follow the rules like everyone else. Then it turns out LSU was following the rules, so it became "but LSU coerced these athletes to file suit. They should be punished for this coercion." Then it turned out the SEC has no evidence of such coercion and have not even alleged it in the suit. So yesterday you pivoted to "this is about Louisiana politics being injected into the LSU athletic program." Now it over the private equity deal. I don't know that I've seen anyone move the goal posts as much as you have during this entire ordeal. At least Sankey and the SEC have remained somewhat consistent in their position, as tenuous as it may be.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter