Started By
Message
re: 4 months later, I still don't think Henry deserved the Heisman
Posted on 4/16/16 at 8:47 pm to schwartzy
Posted on 4/16/16 at 8:47 pm to schwartzy
quote:
4 months later, I still don't think Henry deserved the Heisman
If you think Henry shouldn't have won, that is fine. To say he didn't deserve it is ridiculous.
1
Posted on 4/16/16 at 9:06 pm to harmonics
quote:
If you think Henry shouldn't have won, that is fine. To say he didn't deserve it is ridiculous.
He did not deserve it if he didn't win it. The person that won it deserved it and the other guy was the 2nd best.
Everyone can't get the ribbon and win the trophy. Having winners and losers is crucial.
This post was edited on 4/16/16 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 4/16/16 at 9:07 pm to A Lite
I am just saying all three were deserving and you couldn't argue with any of the winning it.
Posted on 4/16/16 at 9:13 pm to schwartzy
Henry was the 3rd best RB in the sec
Posted on 4/16/16 at 9:17 pm to bmy
quote:
Henry was the 3rd best RB in the sec
Which means the other 2 picked the wrong school.
Posted on 4/16/16 at 9:27 pm to mbogo
quote:
Which means the other 2 picked the wrong school.
As far as winning the Heisman goes, exactly. As far as winning anything goes, really. Anything worth anything.
This post was edited on 4/16/16 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 4/16/16 at 9:37 pm to bmy
quote:
Henry was the 3rd best RB in the sec
The Heisman voters, Doak Walker voters, Maxwell voters, Walter Camp voters, major All-American selectors, and voters for the SEC Offensive Player of the Year (which includes all 14 SEC coaches) respectfully disagree...
Posted on 4/16/16 at 11:30 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
Ok, rickydaddy.
Look at that wanna be me a-hole.
Posted on 4/16/16 at 11:36 pm to schwartzy
Team McCaffrey
Posted on 4/16/16 at 11:56 pm to reel_gator8
quote:
But go back in time with me and you will see that wasnt always the case.
The following is a list of winners since 1940. Those that are bolded played on teams that finished OUTSIDE the Top 5.
1940 - Winner's team finished #3
1941 - Winner's team finished #1
1942 - Winner's team finished #2
1943 - Winner's team finished #1
1944 - Winner's team finished #2
1945 - Winner's team finished #1
1946 - Winner's team finished #2
1947 - Winner's team finished #1
1948 - Winner's team finished #10
1949 - Winner's team finished #1
1950 - Winner's team finished #14
1951 - Winner's team finished #6
1952 - Winner's team finished #4
1953 - Winner's team finished #2
1954 - Winner's team finished #9
1955 - Winner's team finished #5
1956 - Winner's team finished unranked
1957 - Winner's team finished #9
1958 - Winner's team finished #3
1959 - Winner's team finished #3
1960 - Winner's team finished #4
1961 - Winner's team finished #14
1962 - Winner's team finished unranked
1963 - Winner's team finished #2
1964 - Winner's team finished #3
1965 - Winner's team finished #10
1966 - Winner's team finished #11
1967 - Winner's team finished #10
1968 - Winner's team finished #4
1969 - Winner's team finished Unranked
1970 - Winner's team finished #8
1971 - Winner's team finished #12
1972 - Winner's team finished #4
1973 - Winner's team finished #5
1974 - Winner's team finished #4
1975 - Winner's team finished #4
1976 - Winner's team finished #1
1977 - Winner's team finished #4
1978 - Winner's team finished #3
1979 - Winner's team finished #2
1980 - Winner's team finished unranked
1981 - Winner's team finished #14
1982 - Winner's team finished #4
1983 - Winner's team finished #2
1984 - Winner's team finished #5
1986 - Winner's team finished #2
1987 - Winner's team finished unranked
1988 - Winner's team finished #11
1989 - Winner's team finished #14
1990 - Winner's team finished #22
1991 - Winner's team finished #6
1992 - Winner's team finished #3
1993 - Winner's team finished #1
1994 - Winner's team finished #3
1995 - Winner's team finished #6
1996 - Winner's team finished #1
1997 - Winner's team finished #1
1998 - Winner's team finished #15
1999 - Winner's team finished #4
2000 - Winner's team finished #5
2001 - Winner's team finished #8
2002 - Winner's team finished #4
2003 - Winner's team finished #3
2004 - Winner's team finished #1
2005 - Winner's team finished #2
2006 - Winner's team finished #2
2007 - Winner's team finished #13
2008 - Winner's team finished #5
2009 - Winner's team finished #1
2010 - Winner's team finished #1
2011 - Winner's team finished #13
2012 - Winner's team finished #5
2013 - Winner's team finished #1
2014 - Winner's team finished #2
2015 - Winner's team finished #1
Back to your quoted post: it was the case more often than not - even when you go back in time.
This post was edited on 4/16/16 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 4/17/16 at 2:33 am to A Lite
Huh? Nowhere is there a mention of the trophy not being meant to be given to a "superior player on a lesser team."
Posted on 4/17/16 at 12:30 pm to schwartzy
4 months later, he still has the Heisman
Posted on 4/17/16 at 12:56 pm to manbearpig_
He does and probably should have won it the second week in December. However , if they did the awards after the championship games, which I think they should, he would have finished no higher than 3rd. Mccaffery and Watson are clearly better players.
And to the OP, I do not think he'll have a great NFL career. He did have a great year though.
And to the OP, I do not think he'll have a great NFL career. He did have a great year though.
Posted on 4/17/16 at 12:58 pm to schwartzy
Yeaaaa... Definitely shouldn't have won but it's Bama.
Posted on 4/17/16 at 1:07 pm to schwartzy
4 months later, I still disagree. He was the best player on the best team and his stats were certainly Heisman worthy. McCaffrey is excellent as well, though he generally did not face the kind of defenses which Henry and Fournette faced.
Posted on 4/17/16 at 1:18 pm to schwartzy
You're such a crybaby tiger. He deserved it. Others also deserved it as is the case every year, but Henry won it. Cry me a river.
And something like 60%+ of his yards were after contact, young lady.
And something like 60%+ of his yards were after contact, young lady.
Posted on 4/17/16 at 1:20 pm to schwartzy
He was deserving IMO.
Posted on 4/17/16 at 2:53 pm to schwartzy
quote:
4 months later, I still don't think before I post
Posted on 4/17/16 at 3:16 pm to schwartzy
Being the best player on the best team in the country generally gives you the benefit of any doubt. Stanford lost too many games and wasn't in the title hunt. However, McCaffery was the best player in the nation (along w LF7) IMHO. We'll see what happens in 2016. Henry was a worthy Heisman recipient. Congrats to the Tide and Henry on an extra special season in 2015!
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News