Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Houston
Biography:
Interests:LSU football
Occupation:Retired
Number of Posts:2795
Registered on:1/8/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
9 - at the moment. Kiffin played for the tie against Ole Miss instead of going for the "W." Away from home it rarely turns out well. Add to the fact that we were going against a heisman-hopeful QB and the result was predictable. We still had opportunities late in the game but it would have been best in hindsight to go for the lead when the opportunity was there. LSU has arguably 1 of the best coaching staffs in college football. If Kiffin and company can get us thru these next 4 games with wins he'll get a 10. After that the sky is the limit - opportunities to be ranked #1 for sure. Keeping everyone healthy will go a long way in making that happen. Geaux Tigers!
:cheers: :geauxtigers: :cheers:

re: Caden Durham's brother on TikTok

Posted by DrD on 9/23/26 at 5:38 pm to
Either 1 would be great coming out of backfield on screen pass. I could see 1 or 2 of those going to the house...... Sam needs help in the passing game. Haven't seen many screens at all this season.
:bow: :bow: :bow:
3 of our first 4 games this season will be against recent CFP teams (Clemson, Ole Miss, and Atm). Tigers have a healthy "competitive" grade so far with adjustments at half-time being top of the list. Props to the coaches.
Tigers (IMO) need to put together another 4 quarters of competitive dominance to get back on the CFP Lane Train.... A&M blew us out in 2nd half last year. I expect our Tigers to return the favor this time and hopefully play well early and often like we did against Clemson. Already over Ole Piss. They will be a tough out for anyone this season w their pro-ready QB.
Geaux Tigers! :bow:
As LSU fan I can see some competitive traits for both teams. Kiffin's recruiting philosophy was actually pretty cool to listen to. Ole Miss has some gamers much like LSU. Both starting QB's are difference makers. The difference in the game will depend on 2 things (assuming turnovers are minimal for each team): 1. LSU defensive front against OLE MISS front
and 2. OLE MISS defensive backs against LSU receivers (particularly Tre' Dez Green). Tigers win those 2 battles and it's a 2 possession win. If the Tigers win 1 of the 2 it's a 1 possession win for somebody. Looking forward to the rivalry continuing w competitive games ..... Geaux Tigers!
:bow: :cheers: :bow:
True Dat. Any 1 of those 11 plays go in Ohio State's favor and they probably win the game. Also saw a stat where the #1 ranked team having a 17 point lead (at any time I believe) was 233-0. Not to mention a 21 point lead in the 4th qtr. That anomaly will probably hold up a long while. Just a phenomenal "W" for the Longhorns. EVERYTHING went their way towards end of game. Texas earned that "W." Ryan Day also needs to attend a "clock management" class. Don't know what he was thinking at end of game. Hell, Texas left 10+ seconds on the play clock and game clock as well. Fortunately it didn't effect the outcome. These coaches? Guess everyone gets caught in the moment - including the coaches!
:bow: :bow: :bow:
Longhorn fans witnessed a good one Sat. night. So many opportunities for "The" Ohio State Buckeyes to seal the deal. I counted 11-11 in hindsight. What a game for the ages! AWESOME!
:bow: :bow: :bow:

1-3. 3 fumbles - all from offense, and all recovered by Texas
4-5. 2 4th down conversions - in their own territory. Well done!
6-8. 3 passes incomplete to Mr. All-American (Smith) - all in his hands. Great defense!
9-10. 2 times OSU did NOT let Texas score from 1 yard line. Clock was at 1:23 and ended up under 30 seconds....
11. For SURE the BIGGEST: Missed FG in 4th qtr by OSU.

Can only imagine the "thrill of victory" after such a frustrating game for over 2 1/2 quarters.


GLORIOUS! A lot more LSU callers/supporters than ever before. Finebaum seems more flustered and confused with ever phone call. He has been bashing LSU and the state repeatedly. Callers are pushing back and letting him have it - even non-LSU fans. It's been AWESOME! His expression after reading SEC statement was priceless. He needs to have Sankey on the show to clear all this up.
:geauxtigers: :cheers: :geauxtigers: :lol: :lol:

re: SEC could still punish Lane and LSU

Posted by DrD on 9/10/26 at 12:05 pm to
ok Mr. 4 year old child here you geaux w the non-legal interpretation.
But first ... the latest "news" about LSU's "pending" punishment:

"The punishments will come for LSU; don't doubt that, but it looks like the SEC will still be home to the Tigers."

How we got here:
1. SEC meeting to NOT have "pro" players on roster or eligible was agreed to by the league members before season started.
2. LSU has since then been "keeping their options open" to having them (2 players) on roster and hopefully eligible thru Coach Kiffin's public remarks, law suit (temporary restraining order), leaving 2 spots open on opening day roster, and allowing the "pro" players to practice w team.
3. LSU admin. had been publicly quiet leading up to the season - letting Kiffin speak to media.
4. Rumors have been circulating that Coach Kiffin reached out to the players and gave them the idea about coming back to play college football (due to the 5-5 rule - ask your Mom & Dad about that).

Where we are at today (9/10/2026):
1. SEC meeting today will be to discuss current situation (de-escalation) and if there should be any punishment for LSU for what is perceived as "lack of institutional control" b/c Coach Kiffin seemed to be going against league agreement to not roster "pro" players by his actions and words while the administration (by their lack of actions) seemed to be in agreement w Coach Kiffin.

The question of the day is should the SEC punish Coach Kiffin and LSU?
As a Tiger fan the answer is unequivocally NO! However, for any other SEC member program the perception is LSU was letting Coach Kiffin lead the way in this "legal" battle over eligibility and the TRO (temporary restraining order) was going against newly created SEC policy. Therefore they want to punish at minimum Coach Kiffin for his defiance and possibly the university monetarily for allowing it to happen. That's all I got.... Geaux Tigers!


:dunno:

re: Kiffin needs a gag order

Posted by DrD on 9/8/26 at 6:31 pm to
Well.... they are still coming at him simply b/c he won't shut the frick up! I also think there is underlying message for LSU basketball and Will Wade w all the "pro" basketball players he's trying to add to the roster. LSU does not need to make an apology or contrite message. They just need to stop acting like they will play the "pro" players. The "pro" players need to find a new home. End of Story! I'm w SEC on this one. They are an organization and LSU is a member of that organization. Bring this up later since you like searching my message history.

:bow:

Kiffin needs a gag order

Posted by DrD on 9/8/26 at 5:38 pm
If Kiffin would just shut the frick up and quit tyring to get in the last word every chance he gets then there is NO reason for SEC to do anything. The problem is the LSU administration is winding him up and letting him keep the kettle pot boiling. Just shut his arse the frick up and "spot the ball." The SEC powers that be see LSU as keeping the door open to rostering and possibly playing these 2 "pro" players. The SEC powers that be have also spoken and come up with penalties for doing so. That should be enough. Kicking LSU out of the SEC is ridiculous IMHO. Geaux Tigers!
:cheers: :geauxtigers: :cheers:
well unless there is a transfer portal how else could they sign w college team? :dunno:
I mean if the judge in BR keeps the TRO rolling then all hell is going to break loose and there will be many players in portal ready to be picked up/signed. What a country! :geauxtigers:
I want YOU on my team! ALL IN!
:geauxtigers: :cheers: :geauxtigers:
Kiffin only said he would comply w SEC if TRO is overturned. What if TRO is upheld? If TRO is upheld the SEC may continue to push the envelope to another level. Then what? LSU gets kicked out of conference? Probably not. LSU sanctioned by other members of SEC? Probably. Assuming no other teams in SEC can sign these guys then I'm o.k. with that and so should LSU powers that be IMHO. Kiffin needs to just let this play out and shut the frick up! Let the people in charge of LSU athletics make this call. Can anyone say "de-escalate" and mean it w good intentions. I doubt it. This will come back to haunt LSU for years to come if these guys join the team. The SEC will do everything in their power to make sure of that. I'm changing my pussy vote. I'm de-escalating/punting. Long live the King. Huzzah!
:doublebird:
Even if the TRO is deemed legit on Th. would all this nonsense go away if LSU just said ok we know we have legal right to play them but SEC says we can't so we won't play them? That should at least get the SEC in alignment along w other power conferences. They can just go play for someone else. I'm ok w that as a compromise. Right or wrong we don't need to be the BIG BAD WOLF. However, I do applaud Kiffin for pursuing these guys. He has a kick arse philosophy and that's what LSU football needs right now. He's already assembled an NFL-type roster. Let it be - at least in 1st season. Ha!
:rolleyes:
If the shoe was on the other foot, and this had happened during Saban's reign at Alabama and they signed former NFL'ers, Sankey would have been as quiet as a mime in a library. +2 :bow:

re: Is this really a 1 time deal?

Posted by DrD on 9/1/26 at 11:27 am to
ok Sammy, I'm with YOU! Let's remove the "IF" part of original rant. Pretty lame argument to NOT let these guys play. No wonder the judges are siding w the players. Doesn't matter what state is jurisdiction. Thursday arguments will be interesting. Wonder if court room will be full? ha!
:geauxtigers: :geauxtigers:

Is this really a 1 time deal?

Posted by DrD on 9/1/26 at 9:13 am
Say in the future a Harold Perkins-type player decides to go "pro" after his junior year. He doesn't make a roster. Decides he wants to return to college and make some NIL money and avoid the "real world." IF..... this ruling holds up what prevents this from happening? Hell, he could do this again the following year as well. IF.... the premise for this entire argument is these guys did not have opportunity to stay in college b/c the 5-for-5 rule was passed after they decided to go "pro" then that makes sense IMHO. However, unless it's spelled out I see this as a slippery slope and another hot mess for college sports. Rantards - enlighten me please.
Geaux Tigers! :geauxtigers:

re: The END game - CFP committee

Posted by DrD on 8/29/26 at 9:48 am to
Please explain how notre dame not having the resume to make the CFP compares to this situation.

ND was one of the top3 "hottest" teams in the country at end of season. Miami and Indiana were on serious winning streaks as well. Their last loss was in week2 to playoff-bound AtM. They beat the crap out of the remaining teams on their schedule. Resume was worthy of serious consideration.

However, they are NOT in a conference and Miami got the nod b/c (IMHO) they are in a conference. Situation seems relevant to LSU should there be other teams in mix for playoff. Saving grace could be (as mentioned earlier by another ranter) that other teams will do same thing as LSU. We'll see. I like the consensus to play them. LSU is leading the way once again. Legally we seem to be fine.

Another point was made about suing the CFP committee. Kind of like suing a jury on a murder trial verdict. Everyone has an opinion and its impossible to determine legally what they were thinking. I do think changing up the selection committee members is a good move.....
:cheers:

The END game - CFP committee

Posted by DrD on 8/29/26 at 9:04 am
The latest information gathering 1 week b/f our Tigers suit up against Clemson is that LSU will be able to play the ex-NFL players next Sat. The regular season seems to be setup w/o any penalties. The rub is when it comes time for 12 team playoff selection. The early projections are that LSU will be 10-2 or even 9-3 w a solid shot at top 12 based on strength of schedule. However, you can bet your sweet arse if we are in the mix with any other teams for that 12th spot that we are screwed - just like ND in 2025.

The other argument (as I'm sure some of you are thinking) is that LSU will be very, very, very good with the new pieces to the puzzle and go 11-1 or 12-0. That will get them in the playoff and probably a bye in round1.

I think that about covers it 1 week away from kickoff. Should we play these guys or not?
Geaux Tigers! :geauxtigers: :dunno:
With SEC penalties I don't think anyone has to worry about post season ban. LSU is not going to mess w this mess. Money talks. LSU walks. End of story. Not sure why this issue needs any more discussion. The SEC has spoken LOUD and CLEAR. Legal is one thing. Financial fines are another.

However, you have to appreciate Lane Kiffin's pursuit of the best roster possible. There was also a lot of chatter about how this would impact the locker room and others on the roster w their perceived playing time being diminished by bringing in better players so late in the pre-season. That's the part that worried me. Totally unfair to current players on the roster. Cest La Vie. Geaux Tigers!
:geauxtigers: :cheers: :geauxtigers: