Started By
Message
re: 12th Man and "Why not us," both stolen from the SEC ...
Posted on 2/2/14 at 11:49 pm to Tds & Beer
Posted on 2/2/14 at 11:49 pm to Tds & Beer
quote:
But it's ok because Seattle's is so much better
Nothing says a "better" 12th Man quite like pumping noise through speakers and constructing a stadium designed to capture noise emanating from a herd of burnt out techies and potheads.
Better indeed.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:01 am to DWag215
Posted on 2/3/14 at 5:05 am to scrooster
quote:
"Why not us," which we heard them say eighteen times tonight, was stolen from SCAR and the HBC
quote:
Everyone knows the 12th man was stolen from the SEC
Posted on 2/3/14 at 5:39 am to scrooster
I heard Seattle fans singing STTD after the game. Damn it.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 6:33 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Red Bryant says case closed
That's all anyone needs to know.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 6:46 am to scrooster
And the great SCar search for relevance goes on...
You matter, scrooster. You DO matter. I don't care what anyone else says - you are IMPORTANT.
You matter, scrooster. You DO matter. I don't care what anyone else says - you are IMPORTANT.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 7:16 am to kilo
quote:
Does anyone see the irony in a Cock fan trying to compare a 90 year old tradition at aTm with an 8 year old quip from their FBC coach?
Perhaps trying to soften to beating that will happen on August 30th in Columbia?

Posted on 2/3/14 at 7:19 am to DWag215
quote:
Nothing says a "better" 12th Man quite like pumping noise through speakers and constructing a stadium designed to capture noise emanating from a herd of burnt out techies and potheads
Sounds better to me.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:09 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Sounds better to me.
That's silly. You're silly.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:46 am to Crimson Legend
quote:
And the great SCar search for relevance goes on...
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:08 am to scrooster
The trademark issue has been put to rest. Seattle is not stealing our trademark. They are under a licensing agreement to use it. They paid. They get to use it. No theft involved.
Now, for those who are claiming that Seattle should own the trademark, you can kiss that one goodbye for 2 reasons:
1. Seattle admitted that A&M owns the trademark by signing the licensing agreement.
2. A&M was using it way before Seattle, despite what Randy Dook says. A&M was referring to itself as the 12th Man in 1939 at the latest. Seattle Seahawks organization was not even in existence until June 4, 1974.
So, frick each and every last one of you motherfrickers. We are the REAL 12th Man.

Now, for those who are claiming that Seattle should own the trademark, you can kiss that one goodbye for 2 reasons:
1. Seattle admitted that A&M owns the trademark by signing the licensing agreement.
2. A&M was using it way before Seattle, despite what Randy Dook says. A&M was referring to itself as the 12th Man in 1939 at the latest. Seattle Seahawks organization was not even in existence until June 4, 1974.
So, frick each and every last one of you motherfrickers. We are the REAL 12th Man.



Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:26 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Red Bryant says case closed
That calls for a whoop.
Whoop!
Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:36 am to finestfirst79
Randy Dook keeps editing the 12th Man page on wiki. Dude's a total loon!!!


Posted on 2/3/14 at 11:36 am to finestfirst79
quote:
That calls for a whoop.
Whoop!
And a gig em
GIG 'EM
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:49 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
And the great SCar search for relevance goes on...
You matter, scrooster. You DO matter. I don't care what anyone else says - you are IMPORTANT.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:54 pm to Mizz-SEC
All of this talk is nonsense. When people hear of the "12th man" this generation of football fans only thinks about recent success. When you're talking recent championships that captured the attention of the country, you're talking Texas A&M football. Seattle is an afterthought.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:58 pm to bortburgerbort
quote:
bortburgerbort
Carpetbagger...
Posted on 2/3/14 at 5:02 pm to scrooster
quote:
"Why not us," which we heard them say eighteen times tonight, was stolen from SCAR and the HBC ...
Has Spurrier figured out why yet, or does he need some help with that.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 5:52 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Randy Dook keeps editing the 12th Man page on wiki. Dude's a total loon!!!
In his defense, his shenanigans and your reporting on them made me look, where I learned that "The term has a different meaning in cricket, referring instead to the first substitute player who fields when a member of the fielding side is injured."
That's really good info. Cricket rules keep me up at night. This is one less thing I have to worry about.
Popular
Back to top
