Started By
Message
locked post

Spurrier and the USClite

Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:41 pm
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
39437 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:41 pm
So I've been wondering what everyones thoughts are on post spurrier USClite. Every year SOS is getting closer and closer to his days of doing nothing but drinking coors and putting his balls in every hole he can find on the golf course.

What I never hear is what happens to USClite after spurrier. Do people think he's elevated their program to a level where they'll attract another top notch coach or do they go back to their history pre-SOS?

Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37235 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:43 pm to
I think he has, but they will probably looking in the Bielema, Freeze, Miles category for their next coach.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13907 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:43 pm to
They'll probably take a run at Les Miles and then hire Kirk Ferentz.
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:44 pm to
They'll still be a solid program.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21627 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

I think he has, but they will probably looking in the Bielema, Freeze, Miles category for their next coach.


Bielema, Freeze and Miles are in the same category?

Interdasting.
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:48 pm to
Someone on staff, Charlie Strong or Bob Stoops.
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Someone on staff, Charlie Strong or Bob Stoops.

Posted by Breesus2Jimmy
Member since Dec 2011
462 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:49 pm to
Benefited from the East being as weak as it has ever been. Historically awful program which will end up back towards the bottom.
Posted by UAFanFromNOLA
NOLA
Member since Dec 2011
4882 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:50 pm to
Stop putting Bob Stoops's name up for these kind of things. Everything indicates that he is not leaving Oklahoma.
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:50 pm to
Spurrier and Stoops are tight. You think he will be at Oklahoma forever. It's just an off the wall name, not predicting it.
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:51 pm to


BOB STOOPS
Posted by BossaGator
Member since Sep 2010
607 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 3:55 pm to
It's a much more attractive job now, and with the rise in talent in the Carolinas I think it will be an attractive job to a higher level of coach than it would have attracted in the past.
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15834 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 4:42 pm to
I think USC will remain relatively in the same position it is in now after Spurrier leaves-consistently in the top half of the conference.

People that are predicting we fall back into the days of '98 and '99 will be disappointed.

Also I think Lorenzo Ward is working his way into being the heir apparent after Spurrier leaves.

Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
26815 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

I think USC will remain relatively in the same position it is in now after Spurrier leaves-consistently in the top half of the conference.

People that are predicting we fall back into the days of '98 and '99 will be disappointed.


Yeah there are three huge differences between pre-Spurrier and post Spurrier.

1) Our facilities over the last 7-8 years have upgraded tremendously and are finally starting to look like SEC-worthy facilities.
2) People are starting to see that it is possible to win at SC. That goes for both future coaches and future players. The fact that we've been able to keep such in-state talent here such as Sidney Rice, Alshon Jeffery, Marcus Lattimore, and Jadeveon Clowney, will prove to be invaluable to future recruiting in this state.
3) SC fans no longer expect mediocrity. We don't consider playing UT, UGA, or UF 'close' to be a good game for us anymore. We expect to beat them. Simply getting to a bowl game is no longer an acceptable goal. We've been spoiled over the last 3 seasons and its not something we're willing to let go so easily.

Do I expect us to turn into a powerhouse post-Spurrier? Nah. But I do expect us to be in the averaging 8-9 wins a season, legitimately competing for the Eastern crown each season, and every once in a while breaking through to Atl. once more.
This post was edited on 4/1/13 at 4:48 pm
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15834 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Benefited from the East being as weak as it has ever been. Historically awful program which will end up back towards the bottom.


UGA and UF finished 11-2 and Vandy finished 9-3 last year... doesn't seem like the division is still as bad as it was in 2010 yet we were only a game back in both '11 and '12

Also our program has been the epitome of mediocre. Not many good years but the only truly awful years were '98 and '99
Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 4:52 pm to
South Carolina has always had the potential to be what they are today, it just doesn't happen overnight. They deserve some success.

At the moment, South Carolina is strong and has the potential to contend for the SEC. You can't expect more than that. The answer to where the program would go after Mein Visor all depends on who comes next. I would have speculated a slip back after Holtz, but that was wrong.
Posted by Notherdamnhog
Huntsville, Al
Member since Aug 2010
6175 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 4:53 pm to
Gruden. End of conversation.
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 4:58 pm to
Saban will come to win a title to get back at spurrier for his "win somewhere that hasnt won before" jabs
This post was edited on 4/1/13 at 5:08 pm
Posted by CockStrong
Member since Oct 2012
157 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 5:00 pm to
I think getting Frank Martin from ksu for our pathetic bball program has shown usc can land great coaches and throw some money around
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 4/1/13 at 5:09 pm to
Prior to Holtz IMO we were considered more of a C-USA or Sunbelt program allowed to mingle in the SEC parlor. Holtz had a couple of good years, but his final 3 seasons sort of made '00 and '01 more of an exception than a rule.

Spurrier's time we've seen so much huge improvements in the program and athletics at USC overall, that the overall perception of USC athletics today seems foreign to what it was pre-Holtz. Back then USC struggled to bring in proven HCs from other top programs - we were very fortunate to lure Holtz and Spurrier from college football retirement.

Today IMO we'd not have to go that route, and should be able to bring in a qualified head coach that is currently running winning programs elsewhere, but would love to become involved in SEC football...
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter