Started By
Message
re: OM football cited in 13 of 28 violations
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:04 pm to Wall Street Reb
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:04 pm to Wall Street Reb
Yeah... That dude sux
Actually, I was just two feet away from Bundy.... Prolly should've asked him
Actually, I was just two feet away from Bundy.... Prolly should've asked him
This post was edited on 2/9/16 at 9:19 pm
1
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:14 pm to WhistlinDixie15
My very close friend who is an ex-player (whitey that barely played) and keeps in touch with the program said he has heard this and it was confirmed to him:
- 3 are Tunsil and are the serious ones
- 5 are FCA person, who was deemed a booster, giving rides to Oxford for games
- 1 is CJ Hampton receiving illegal contact in HS
Didn't say the rest.
- 3 are Tunsil and are the serious ones
- 5 are FCA person, who was deemed a booster, giving rides to Oxford for games
- 1 is CJ Hampton receiving illegal contact in HS
Didn't say the rest.
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:22 pm to TheCaterpillar
Robert mad Denzel being retards
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:22 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:Figured this would be part of it. And the punishment we gave ourselves, the NCAA was ok with it.
- 3 are Tunsil and are the serious ones
quote:The FCA dude giving rides isn't serious. Not sure about Hampton
- 5 are FCA person, who was deemed a booster, giving rides to Oxford for games
- 1 is CJ Hampton receiving illegal contact in HS
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:22 pm to TheCaterpillar
Chuck is saying 4 were Tunsil related
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:24 pm to RebelExpress38
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:25 pm to TMRebel
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:26 pm to Rebel Land Shark
I'm gonna say 7 1/2
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:33 pm to Ancient Astronaut
I'm going with Landshark. He actually has a link.
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:37 pm to TheCaterpillar
3+5+1=9
Plus the 4 from Saunders.
That seems to be the breakdown of the 13.
The serious one(s) being Tunsil and/or Saunders (though you could argue that we turned him in after firing him 6+yrs ago).
I could see scholarship/visit reductions and a couple years probation, but nothing serious as a postseason ban or even vacated wins
Plus the 4 from Saunders.
That seems to be the breakdown of the 13.
The serious one(s) being Tunsil and/or Saunders (though you could argue that we turned him in after firing him 6+yrs ago).
I could see scholarship/visit reductions and a couple years probation, but nothing serious as a postseason ban or even vacated wins
This post was edited on 2/9/16 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:37 pm to TMRebel
Everyone in Oxford should boycott Cannon Motors.
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:38 pm to Ancient Astronaut
So no one has a clue.
Here is my thought. Just a guess though.
My thought is the unidentified anonymous source was in fact OM getting the story out now. Brandt is a fair national writer who wouldn't put a lot of negative spin on the story. So he gets the breaking news, OM gets the story told in a favorable manner leaving grey areas.
Could it have been a coincidence? Maybe. I'm of the opinion it probably was planned. If its going to come out anyway why not have it delivered fairly...
Here is my thought. Just a guess though.
My thought is the unidentified anonymous source was in fact OM getting the story out now. Brandt is a fair national writer who wouldn't put a lot of negative spin on the story. So he gets the breaking news, OM gets the story told in a favorable manner leaving grey areas.
Could it have been a coincidence? Maybe. I'm of the opinion it probably was planned. If its going to come out anyway why not have it delivered fairly...
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:43 pm to Doresrules
I think we should stop trying to spin this positively. This isn't good. Let's let it play out.
Posted on 2/9/16 at 9:43 pm to Doresrules
If it wasn't us Ross better be pissed and now start releasing some details.
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:07 pm to sorantable
quote:
I think we should stop trying to spin this positively. This isn't good. Let's let it play out.
What part of this is a big deal?
We are not charged with failure to oversee. Which means no LOIC. Freeze is not involved personally. The most serious allegations are Tunsil and have been addressed.
How is any of this a bad case scenario?
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:17 pm to No Colors
quote:
What part of this is a big deal?
It's not
quote:
We are not charged with failure to oversee. Which means no LOIC. Freeze is not involved personally. The most serious allegations are Tunsil and have been addressed.
We self reported the majority of this. We've already self penalized ourselves for most of this. Most of the reported violations are minor in detail
quote:
How is any of this a bad case scenario?
It's not
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:32 pm to sorantable
quote:
This isn't good.
Posted on 2/9/16 at 10:56 pm to rebelcommodore
If Ole Miss is penalized for anything concerning Tunsil, does Ole Miss have a right to sue the NCAA? Since they approved the 7 game suspension and gave Tunsil the go ahead to play?
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:07 pm to RebelFreeze48
Posted on 2/9/16 at 11:14 pm to SwayzeCrazy
that gif
my sides are now in orbit
my sides are now in orbit
Page 2 of 9
Latest Ole Miss News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News