Started By
Message

Grade game 1: Louisville

Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted by braves21
Colorado
Member since Sep 2022
1980 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 2:59 pm
C
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
27498 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:08 pm to
1st half offense: F
1st half defense: B

2nd half offense: C
2nd half defense: F

Special Teams: B

Overall: D+
Posted by RebelVol
The Sip
Member since Aug 2016
4900 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

1st half defense: B
feel like the first half defense was an A. Apart from the very last drive where Louisville is in a two minute tempo, we held them to ~40 yards total and had three consecutive drives where Louisville actually lost yards.

Otherwise think you’re pretty right, maybe stretch and give the offense a B/B- second half. We only had two drives after halftime that didn’t result in points.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
13016 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:33 pm to
Trying to find actual confirmation, but it seemed like our defense really fell apart when Keaton Thomas (also our green dot) went out injured. He left the field and our back-end organization just fell apart. I think all of those 2nd half busted coverage plays occured when he was off the field
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
55106 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:11 am to
quote:

2nd half offense: C

My dude, we pretty much did what we wanted and scored 31 points in the second half without Kewan. I’m giving it an A.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
27498 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:13 am to
quote:

My dude, we pretty much did what we wanted and scored 31 points in the second half without Kewan. I’m giving it an A.


We did not do what we wanted. We only had 1 sustained drive. We couldn't run out the clock when we needed to. Our running game was atrocious. Thank goodness for big plays.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
55106 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:16 am to
I’m all for holding the team to a high standard, so hell yeah.
quote:

We couldn't run out the clock when we needed to. Our running game was atrocious.

I still maintain that having our Heisman-hopeful RB might have helped here. JDB definitely needs to spread Kewan out some. He won’t last long running up the center’s arse every other play.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
74417 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:22 am to
I think that the game plan just assumed that the strength of our offensive line matched up well enough with the weakness of their interior defensive line, and that we could just drive the field on them between the tackles. In theory, that absolutely should have happened and it’s a little concerning that it did not.

I think their defensive strategy at the beginning of the game was the same as ours in that you sell out completely to stop the run. Our game plan in the second half was very much more balance.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
74417 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Our running game was atrocious


We were busting off 5 yard gains running up the middle in the fourth quarter with our backup running backs. The problem is our offense relies heavily on tempo and not for slow methodical pacing that runs out the clock. That’s how it’s always been with this type of offense during Kiffin’s era.

The best way for us to run out the clock is to still spread the field laterally with some rollouts and short high percentage passes to complement the run game.
Posted by REBEL5 AC
Member since Sep 2012
17825 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:26 am to
Trinidad did somehting in the second half that no pro or college QB has done in a half in 30+ years. Second half offense was an A
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
27498 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:18 am to
Trinidad was an A in the second half, but I'm sorry guys, I want to see more versatility and control from our offense than we showed even in the 2nd half.
Posted by Dixie.Reb
Oxford
Member since Jul 2013
4042 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:37 am to
Not having Lacy is why we couldn’t salt away the game. Same reason we blew leads in 2024 without a power back. The backups played well but aren’t bruisers who can run into a 7 man box.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
27498 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:39 am to
Did we call an outside run that wasn't a triple option play?
Posted by RougeRebel
Member since Dec 2019
83 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 6:06 am to
B-


Chambliss looked shaky to start but settled in by the second half. The opposite seems to be true for the defense but keep in mind 3 starters were out in the second half. 3 critical starters in Kite, Denson and Thomas. I know we don’t want to have to depend on the 1’s to carry the entire load but we also can’t expect the 2’s to step in game 1 and play lockdown defense either. They are 2’s for a reason.

Didn’t have Lacy for most of the second half as well. Sometimes it took him half a game to get going so we’ll be fine in the run game. A lot of people think we have a receiver shortage but I tend to disagree. Deuce and Odom are obvious playmakers but I think we’ll start to see either Ray and Cook come on as the season progresses. Similar fashion as to Stribling last year.

What’s get left out is how good and well coached Louisville is. We played good team boys. It was a game 1, they knocked off some rust against a worthy opponent, hopefully learned some hard lessons but they will improve.
Posted by umrebel96
Member since Sep 2016
595 posts
Posted on 9/19/26 at 11:32 pm to
Louisville is helping us out. They have a legit chance to run the table
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter