Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NASA unveils schedule for 'Artemis' 2024 Moon mission

Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:17 pm
Posted by Trumansfangs
Town & Country
Member since Sep 2018
6892 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:17 pm
NASA on Thursday unveiled the calendar for the "Artemis" program that will return astronauts to the Moon for the first time in half a century, including eight scheduled launches and a mini-station in lunar orbit by 2024.



The original lunar missions were named for Apollo—Artemis was his twin sister in Greek mythology, and the goddess of hunting, wilderness and the Moon.

Administrator Jim Bridenstine confirmed that Artemis 1 will be an uncrewed mission around the Moon planned for 2020.

Next will come Artemis 2, which will orbit Earth's satellite with a crew around 2022; followed finally by Artemis 3 that will put astronauts on lunar soil in 2024, including the first woman.

The three will be launched into space by the biggest rocket of all time, the Boeing-led Space Launch System (SLS), which is currently under development but has seen numerous delays and has been criticized in some quarters as a bloated jobs program.

Affixed to its summit will be the Orion capsule, for which Lockheed Martin is the primary contractor.

In addition to these missions, which will be all NASA's efforts, there will be five launches carrying the building blocks of the lunar mini-station "Gateway" which will serve as a staging point for the Moon landing.

These will be carried out between 2022 and 2024 by private space companies, which NASA will pay for their services.

The orbital station will initially consist of a simple power and propulsion element and a small habitat module. In 2024, astronauts will stop there en route to the Moon.

They will then descend to the surface on a lander.

A part of the lander will remain on the Moon while the other part will take off and allow the astronauts to return to their station, where they will board the Orion capsule and return to Earth.

Bridenstine said Thursday that NASA had chosen private firm Maxar to build the station's first module, the power and propulsion element, which would rely on huge solar panels.

In the coming months, NASA will have to decide on who will build the lander. Aerospace giants such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin are vying for the contract as are new players like Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin.

"We're not owning the hardware, we're buying the service," said Bridenstine of the lander. "The goal here is speed. 2024 is right around the corner."

He added: "Our goal is ultimately to move on to Mars and not get stuck on the surface of the Moon"


phys.org
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
10925 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 8:39 pm to
shotgun!
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
19056 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 8:45 pm to
In the mean time I'll drive on beat up arse highways and bridges and work around blackouts and bad drinking water.

Good grief,let's spend money making where we live more livable.

I don't see us living on these dead planets when ours is destroyed.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 8:53 pm to
There's little to be gained from manned missions to the Moon or Mars but if it revives interest in space exploration then it'll be worth the expense, even as enormous as that will be.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95873 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 11:08 pm to
I knew someone would be stupid enough to make this argument
Posted by Nicky Parrish
Member since Apr 2016
7098 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 5:06 am to
quote:

In the coming months, NASA will have to decide on who will build the lander

A planned moon landing by 2024 and they haven’t started building the lander yet?
Don’t see that happening in that time frame.
I wish them well.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 8:59 am to
quote:

I knew someone would be stupid enough to make this argument
I like how you attack the argument and not the person. That shows a lot of intelligence and class.
Posted by Commander Data
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2016
7289 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 10:41 am to
It is a,waste of resources to put men on the moon again but not like the money, time and resources we plan to waste sending a manned expedition to Mars.
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
10925 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 1:22 pm to
Isn't this rush in response to Russia and China?

(haven't looked just seems like I've read something lately)
Posted by Trumansfangs
Town & Country
Member since Sep 2018
6892 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 4:02 pm to
What breakthrough technologies will develop and advance due to this program ? How will we, or our children enjoy them ?
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 5:17 pm to
All you people arguing that the space program will lead to tremendous advances in our everyday lives are really off track with that.

What we need is another world war or at least a cold war. That's how we got jets, and nuclear power, and the internet and stuff.

Space is fool's gold.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
17879 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

In the coming months, NASA will have to decide on who will build the lander. Aerospace giants such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin are vying for the contract as are new players like Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin.

I'd take grumman or douglas... seeing as how they've already done it several times. And isn't Boeing and Lockheed just the ULA conglomerate who has delivered us into space mediocrity?
Posted by Trumansfangs
Town & Country
Member since Sep 2018
6892 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Space is fool's gold.



What if they change the mission name to Jayhawk ?
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

What we need is another world war or at least a cold war.
frick that.
Posted by Kcprogguitar
Kansas City
Member since Oct 2014
887 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 6:58 pm to
2024?

China will have a million people there by then.

They will have sent 5 million, but still.
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6835 posts
Posted on 5/28/19 at 5:19 pm to
We have to establish a permanent presence on the moon. China cannot be allowed to take possession of it.
Neither the US, China or Russia ever signed the Moon Treaty of 1979. There is currently no international agreement concerning territorial disputes concerning the moon, or any other celestial bodies.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter