Started By
Message
Free Kills
Posted on 4/1/14 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 4/1/14 at 12:54 pm
16
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:04 pm to KSGamecock
Free killz
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:11 pm to KSGamecock
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:13 pm to KSGamecock
I told him calling out other posters was a bad idea... 
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:13 pm to KSGamecock
If he is banned, it's for calling out a single poster for like the 10th time
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:44 pm to Bama Bird
Just because his avi is gone doesnt necessarily mean he is banned. He plays that game every now and then
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:44 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Just because his avi is gone doesnt necessarily mean he is banned. He plays that game every now and then
He was there when I went to lunch, unless I missed something he should still be there.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 3:46 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
I've read elsewhere on the rant that
quote:
"threads asking for posters to be unbanned actually prolong them coming back."
Then why would they have this Thread
Posted on 4/1/14 at 3:49 pm to Rebel Titan
I hadn't seen that, I don't go the TD OT-Lounge often. Maybe it's to create a false sense of hope?
Posted on 4/1/14 at 4:01 pm to KSGamecock
That's the only one I've ever seen and I saw that as more of a mass reinstatement thread where essentially amnesty was granted virtually all banned posters (except the permabans) and they wanted to make sure they got everyone back to give a fresh start. In a way I suppose it could suggest that lobbying could help have a banned poster reinstated but my overall sense is they pretty much determine what the suspension is going to be on an individual case-by-case basis and stick to it.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 4:05 pm to Litigator
quote:
That's the only one I've ever seen
They have them every few months
Posted on 4/1/14 at 4:10 pm to NYCAuburn
I think we're due (based on how they're normally spaces out) for another reinstatement thread.
Make it happen Ultra Mega Chicken
Make it happen Ultra Mega Chicken
Posted on 4/1/14 at 4:16 pm to NYCAuburn
Then maybe there is something to the lobbying or maybe they want everyone to lobby when they make the reinstatement thread but I was thinking I had seen posters reinstated from time-to-time outside of a mass reinstatement.
TBH I don't know that there are any clear cut rules relating to the issue (as well as some others) as a lot of things seem to get made up as time goes along and not enunciated anywhere; discretion I guess.
TBH I don't know that there are any clear cut rules relating to the issue (as well as some others) as a lot of things seem to get made up as time goes along and not enunciated anywhere; discretion I guess.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 4:20 pm to KSGamecock
Dammit Killz, I hope he didn't get banned yet AGAIN
Posted on 4/1/14 at 4:27 pm to Litigator
quote:Yep, it's been known to happen
I was thinking I had seen posters reinstated from time-to-time outside of a mass reinstatement.
This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 4/1/14 at 4:43 pm to Wishnitwas1998
I saw a thread, don't remember which one, where he was posting in earlier today. He was giving somebody hell in it.......big surprise.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 5:07 pm to Litigator
quote:
they wanted to make sure they got everyone back to give a fresh start
Lol they don't give you a fresh start... The longer your rap sheet, the shorter the leash you're on.
After coming back from a ban one time I was told I have one of the longest rap sheets in the tigerdroppings community and that played a large part in my ban that time... I can provide a link of this if necessary.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 5:32 pm to KSGamecock
Nahh
Posted on 4/1/14 at 5:48 pm to KSGamecock
He's banned and for good reason.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 5:53 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
This is an informative thread.
When I said fresh start I meant they were letting those banned to get back on. As far as prior sanctions, repeat offenders, and that kind of thing, I didn't know if someone had a record that the same was taken into account if they got in trouble again but that makes sense.
I haven't been around long but I am surprised you have done anything banworthy based on the posts of yours that I have read at least.
When I said fresh start I meant they were letting those banned to get back on. As far as prior sanctions, repeat offenders, and that kind of thing, I didn't know if someone had a record that the same was taken into account if they got in trouble again but that makes sense.
I haven't been around long but I am surprised you have done anything banworthy based on the posts of yours that I have read at least.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News