re: Caslen needs to zip it

Pastides was a fantastic President, I feel blessed he was in charge when I was there. He did a lot of good for USC

Or it’s just pointing out that the people above Muschamp are also doing a poor job currently. Had the BOT,AD, and president all made one statement together supporting Will, some recruits would be more firm . Will has to win more, we all agree this year has been bad, but his superiors haven’t helped

* I almost created a poll a few days ago asking who was doing a worse job at the moment.

-Caslen
-Tanner
-Bot
-Muschamp.

I think the answers would have been spread out a few days ago.

My point is that even if Caslen and Tanner hadn’t sharted their pants this past week, recruits are going to de-commit and players are going to enter the transfer portal the second Muschamp is fired.

It sucks, but I’d sacrifice signing Marshawn Lloyd if it meant we’d be successful in 3 years.
That’s what would happen if Muschamp were to be fired after the Clemson game.

Caslen isn’t helping anything, but if we’re going to keep Muschamp for next year, he can restore goodwill with fans and alumni if he just gets rid of Tanner already IMO.

And I don’t disagree that Will being on the fans hotseat makes kids think, but kids get to thinking about elsewhere even more so when the university seems to not know if he will be back. That’s the reason for a statement of support for now

I think its to late to walk words back once they are out there. The damage is done. If Will gets trounced by clempson he should be done also.

Caslen hired nikki haley to control the "message" on muschamp..

If he'd a shut it from the get go she wouldnt need to be hired

If thats really why he isnt coming here then probably best for us because he would be the type to hit the portal quick.

I don’t care what 2 recruits think about the University President anymore than I care what a goat in Wyoming eats for breakfast.

Caslen needs to clean the bitch assedness out of all parts of the University and if that bothers a couple of recruits then they don’t belong here. I don’t care about Muschamp - I was a graduate/fan before him and I will be a fan/graduate long after he leaves. I care about the long term sustained success of our athletic department with 90% of that interest being in the football program. Muschamp ain’t the one. If losing two recruits means we replace him with someone who is better for us long term then that’s an addition by subtraction. Besides, how many of his recruits have panned out anyways? Edwards, Deebo (for like 15 games), and Kinlaw (who will be a pro then collegian). Who else? Hurst maybe, but he was coming here anyways.

Florida fans were not happy and showed concern when we got Spurrier. They laughed if they gave a damn at all about us getting Muschamp. That should have told you everything. Guys don’t fail at one P5 program and go on to more success at another one in the same conference.

Muschamp’s last season is next season. Caslen will clear him, Tanner, and probably Frank out and give the new AD a blank slate.

Depending on how he does in year 2, the first coaching call needs to be to Joe Brady. Lower salary for him, but tell him he can hire any DC and any S&C he wants, money ain’t a problem.