Started By
Message
Jalen or Tua
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:17 pm
Who will start?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:17 pm to biggsc
Should be Tua but will definitely be Jalen.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:17 pm to biggsc
Jalen definitely.
But it's a win/win.
If we lose with Jalen, next year is the Tua show.
If we win with Jalen, we're back in the championship game.
But it's a win/win.
If we lose with Jalen, next year is the Tua show.
If we win with Jalen, we're back in the championship game.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:17 pm to biggsc
Hurts will start, but when he starts not seeing/hitting open receivers he should be replaced.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:18 pm to biggsc
Jalen. I’d be sure to keep Tua warmed up, though.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:19 pm to biggsc
Shouldn't matter. Bama isn't good enough to beat Clemson.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:20 pm to Barstools
I haven't watched any Clemson games this year. How does this team stack up to last years team?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:23 pm to biggsc
We ride or die with Jalen this year. Will be a legit QB competition in the spring, and we risk one or the other transferring. But this is Jalen’s show through January, whatever happens. Roll Tide! Go on Jalen!
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:25 pm to ChoadieMcSmalls
Better on defense.
Offense seems about the same honestly. Kinda weird to say that since they lost Deshaun.
Offense seems about the same honestly. Kinda weird to say that since they lost Deshaun.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:26 pm to Barstools
And Ga isn't good enough to beat Oklahoma
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:27 pm to Barstools
quote:
Offense seems about the same honestly. Kinda weird to say that since they lost Deshaun.
No, they are unquestionably worse on offense. Clemson was 22nd in Offensive FEI coming into last night's game. They were 6th in Offensive FEI last year. It's a substantial drop-off.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:29 pm to biggsc
Jalen will start...
Tua is better and it's crazy that Saban is burning the kid's eligibility until he transfers.
Tua is better and it's crazy that Saban is burning the kid's eligibility until he transfers.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:32 pm to Bench McElroy
Watson 2016: 4591 yards passing, 41 TDs-17 INTs, 629 yards rushing, 9 TDs.
Best running back 2016: Gallman 1133 yards, 13 TDs, 5.0 YPC
Bryant 2017: 2678 yards passing, 13 TDs-6 INTs, 646 yards rushing, 11 TDs
Best running back 2017: Etienne 744 yards, 13 TDs, 7.2 YPC.
So they've shifted to running the ball more, but losing that much production through the air is staggering.
Best running back 2016: Gallman 1133 yards, 13 TDs, 5.0 YPC
Bryant 2017: 2678 yards passing, 13 TDs-6 INTs, 646 yards rushing, 11 TDs
Best running back 2017: Etienne 744 yards, 13 TDs, 7.2 YPC.
So they've shifted to running the ball more, but losing that much production through the air is staggering.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:31 pm to Kcoyote
quote:
Watson 2016: 4591 yards passing, 41 TDs-17 INTs, 629 yards rushing, 9 TDs. Best running back 2016: Gallman 1133 yards, 13 TDs, 5.0 YPC Bryant 2017: 2678 yards passing, 13 TDs-6 INTs, 646 yards rushing, 11 TDs Best running back 2017: Etienne 744 yards, 13 TDs, 7.2 YPC. So they've shifted to running the ball more, but losing that much production through the air is staggering.
Wow, this actually plays to Bama's strength. Looks like (based on stats only) Bryant is about the same as Watson, in terms of running, but far less of a threat with his arm, which always seems to be a Bama weakness. Their running back this year has a couple more ypc but way less total yards.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:37 pm to biggsc
I don't care who the Bama QB is if they will just lose that QB centered offense and go back to running the ball. Running the ball and being physical has served us well in the past. Bama doesn't need a dual threat QB. The defense just needs to learn how to stop one.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News