Started By
Message
re: SEC turns down Clempson and FSU?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:56 pm to 8
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:56 pm to 8
I could see them turn Clemson and FSU down now to wait and see what the fallout politically is going to be taking OU and Texas. They don't want to be fighting a war on 2 fronts with commissioners and politicians and lawyers from the left behind schools.
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 3:59 pm
0
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:17 pm to 8
I say no. We are at the sweet spot for right now.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:22 pm to 8
Wowzees.
SEC doesn't think Clemson and FSU bring the streaming numbers OU/TX do.
Any word yet from the SEC on the colossal streaming numbers of UVA and North Carolina?
SEC doesn't think Clemson and FSU bring the streaming numbers OU/TX do.
Any word yet from the SEC on the colossal streaming numbers of UVA and North Carolina?
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:11 pm to 8
Complaints about Tx., Oklahoma, & Mizzouri on geography......& now you want to add ND (Indiana)??? 
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:13 pm to 8
Geographically, this makes much more sense than adding Arkansas, Missouri, Texas and Oklahoma.
Just sayin'.
Just sayin'.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:20 pm to 8
quote:
The SEC is concerned that streaming numbers for Clemson+Florida State don't bring what Oklahoma+Texas do.
which gator wrote this?
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:43 pm to 8
You people aren't paying attention...
LINK /
Neither team can afford to give up ALL of their TV money until 2036. Clemson and FSU aren't going anywhere (and neither is any other ACC team...)
LINK /
quote:
The ACC has an ‘exit fee’ to leave the conference set right at about $52 million. I know what you’re thinking here: What’s the big deal? Clemson would make enough off its first year of television revenue payout in the SEC to cover that ‘exit fee’ and there’s a chance that the SEC would even pitch in to help.
While that exit number is doable, it’s the league’s Grant of Rights agreement that all but keeps schools locked into the conference.
For those who are unfamiliar, a Grant of Rights agreement is written permission from an institution- like Clemson- to relinquish control of television rights for the duration of the deal. The ACC’s deal is set to expire in 2036. If you leave the ACC, you forfeit the television earnings. So, when you total what Clemson might make off its ACC television payout, you’re talking hundreds of millions of dollars.
Neither team can afford to give up ALL of their TV money until 2036. Clemson and FSU aren't going anywhere (and neither is any other ACC team...)
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:17 pm to 8
No they didn’t.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:40 pm to 8
I can tell you this OU and Ok State made a plea to the sec before this ou Texas thing happened
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:41 pm to 8
Add ND and NC
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:46 pm to 8
From a TV market perspective, Oklahoma and Texas do technically make more sense.
Geographically, FSU and Clemson make more sense.
Geographically, FSU and Clemson make more sense.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:42 pm to 8
quote:
assistant program director at ESPN
He’s an assistant program director at the ESPN AFFILIATE in Greenville SC.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 9:23 pm to 8
Do we really want these guys in our conference?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News