Started By
Message

Who would you rather have coaching your team?
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:30 pm
Mark Stoops or Ed Orgeron without Joe Brady
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:31 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
Coach O. No question
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:31 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
The guy who is head coach of a 14-0 number one team
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:32 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
frick kinda question is this lmao
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:35 pm to LMfan
It’s a serious question. Stoops just won 8 games playing a WR at QB 4/5’s of the year. A season after winning 10 games last season..at KENTUCKY. Could Orgeron win 8 games with this Kentucky team? Be honest with yourselves.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:42 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
Ed O. If it’s not Brady, he will find another one who’s just about as good.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:44 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
I’d simply rather be a fan of LSU, because our school can win championships with multiple coaches while most can’t win one period.
Hell... Les Miles won 2 SEC Titles here, played for 2 National Championships, and won one.
Hell... Les Miles won 2 SEC Titles here, played for 2 National Championships, and won one.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:48 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
Kentucky didn't play near the schedule. Ed would not win at Kentucky though.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:50 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
Ed won 10 games last year without Joe Brady
Getting more and more evidence that says Orgeron will be kicking your arse for a long time
Getting more and more evidence that says Orgeron will be kicking your arse for a long time
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:55 pm to Rosenblatt
quote:
Ed won 10 games last year without Joe Brady
Getting more and more evidence that says Orgeron will be kicking your arse for a long time
We shouldn't not win 10 due to our talent. Hard to say how important coaching actually is at LSU with all its resources.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:57 pm to TomTheGhost
Years of evidence say coaching matters a lot
LSU doesn’t recruit itself and not just anyone can win 10 games a year
I agree with your point, but history says otherwise
LSU doesn’t recruit itself and not just anyone can win 10 games a year
I agree with your point, but history says otherwise
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:58 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
Both. Plz get rid of Moorhead
Posted on 12/31/19 at 10:59 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
quote:
Stoops just won 8 games playing a WR at QB 4/5’s of the year.
Yeah, but did you see their losses?
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:03 pm to TomTheGhost
quote:I hate when people say shite like that.
We shouldn't not win 10 due to our talent. Hard to say how important coaching actually is at LSU with all its resources.
You realize the same thing applies to Texas, Florida State, USC, right? And do you even remember the 90's?
shite doesn't get handed to you just because, you have to go out and earn it.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:18 pm to Scoob
quote:
I hate when people say shite like that.
You realize the same thing applies to Texas, Florida State, USC, right? And do you even remember the 90's?
shite doesn't get handed to you just because, you have to go out and earn it.
Have we not had one of the best crops of talent in this state? The SEC has also been huge where as in the past the Big 12, Big 10, and PAC had their shades of dominance. Also, dont know why this gets you upset? Ed O has worked his tail off, but hes not the end all be all. Just like Les now at Kansas.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:20 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
O recruits backups
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:34 pm to TomTheGhost
quote:Ok cool so you didn’t watch LSU before 2000 then
Hard to say how important coaching actually is at LSU with all its resources.
Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:36 pm to Bayouhillbilly1
Good question. Stoops is doing this at Kentucky. O had success at usc and LSU. He inherited a bad situation both times. Damn good question.
Probably Stoops because he has won at Kentucky. But can’t go wrong with either
Probably Stoops because he has won at Kentucky. But can’t go wrong with either
Popular
Back to top
