Started By
Message
locked post

Why didn't L8U take the ball when they won the coin toss?

Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:57 pm
Posted by Paul B Ammer
The Mecca of Tuscaloosa
Member since Jul 2017
2423 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:57 pm
Get the ball first and limit Bama's 1st half possessions. Surely Corch O (as in 0) was not dumb enough to think his 600 yard giving up D could stop Bama.
Posted by tmjones2
TX
Member since Feb 2013
1548 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:59 pm to
It was mind boggling to me. Your best player is out for the first half and you're going to choose to give Bama the ball?
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28553 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:59 pm to
Gary actually made a good point as to why they should have taken the ball, not that it would have mattered
Posted by NashvilleTiger09
Nashville
Member since Jul 2014
837 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:00 pm to
Honestly, that first drive of the game could not have gone any better for LSU time wise. Bama chewed of 5 minutes in the first only to end the drive with a punt.
Posted by Damseyrarrar
Bunche Village
Member since Oct 2016
428 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:00 pm to
Because he knew his 600 yd giving up D could stop Bama on THAT possession.......and he was right. Genuis move.
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS (mountain time)
Member since Mar 2004
72475 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:01 pm to
I don’t even remember the last time LSU or Alabama asked for the ball





This post was edited on 11/5/18 at 1:02 pm
Posted by RollDawgRoll
Member since Sep 2009
2045 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:02 pm to
cause they knew that prissy fingered qb would get a 3 and out. They had a better chance of preventing BAMA from getting a TD on the first drive than they had getting a first down.
Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
16839 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:02 pm to
Because he had a better chance at getting a stop than scoring a TD on the opening drive?
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50548 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Honestly, that first drive of the game could not have gone any better for LSU time wise. Bama chewed of 5 minutes in the first only to end the drive with a punt.


Time wise, perhaps. However, what it actually showed was that Bama’s offense could do whatever it wanted - right off the bat. It took 3 major unforced errors to keep us out of the endzone that drive. I think that set the tone for the rest of the game. LSU’s defense was immediately on their heels, and they knew it was going to be a long night.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:03 pm to
Strategery
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11942 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:03 pm to
Put your best unit on the field first, then get the ball after half.

Let's be honest, Bama likely gets the ball around midfield after a 3 and out otherwise.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29454 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

I think that set the tone for the rest of the game.

I think LSU offense going 3 and out for their first series would have set the tone as well.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:05 pm to
I didn't understand this either.

The refs even handed the coin toss to LSU with the fake double headed coin, and coach O still messed that up.
This post was edited on 11/5/18 at 1:07 pm
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51197 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:07 pm to
Cause they were comin
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11195 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:07 pm to
Good call. I'm pretty sure this is the reason we lost.
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
21869 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:07 pm to
Had Delpit's cheapshot on Tua landed on its mark vs. Hitting him in the nuts... it would have looked like a phenomenal choice with Mac Jones having to finish the game.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11195 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Had Delpit's cheapshot

That was a cheapshot? Your own players said they couldn't hear the whistle.
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
21869 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Your own players said they couldn't hear the whistle.
the not stopping was less an issue than the dive at his legs.

Any defensive player getting a shot at a still standing QB with ball in his hands hits him high to attempt to force a fumble.

Tua is left handed and was facing Delpit with the ball in hand chest high. Delpit dove straight into Tua's lower body. Tua managed to get his right leg back and shift body position just before impact. If he hadn't, Delpit hits his right leg and or hyperextends Tuas injured leg.

There is/was no reason to go low in that scenario with Tua standing still. It looks pretty blatant.
This post was edited on 11/5/18 at 1:44 pm
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Gary actually made a good point as to why they should have taken the ball, not that it would have mattered


Strange, I heard Gary bashing the frick out of him for the decision for exactly the same reason as the OP. I honestly thought I was reading a verbatim quote from him as I read it.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11195 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

the not stopping was less an issue than the dive at his legs.

Any defensive player getting a shot at a still standing QB with ball in his hands hits him high to attempt to force a fumble

I guess you don't watch much football. You can't go high anymore. Coaches teach defensive player to target the midsection, which is exactly where Delpit hit. He certainly didn't dive at Tua's knees like you're seeming to say.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter