Started By
Message

re: Corso's saying UT and Oklahoma leaving Big 12 in next 5 years most likely 4 SEC

Posted on 4/5/17 at 3:43 pm to
Posted by Cold Drink
Member since Mar 2016
3482 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 3:43 pm to
OU has the most to lose IMO. If yall come to SEC yall going to be the next Nebraska, especially if the Texas kids LSU doesn't want can stay home playing for UT or Aggy and still be SEC.
Posted by Boomer00
Member since Sep 2015
3376 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 3:47 pm to
OU is closer to Dallas than anybody. They out recruited all Texas schools talent for talent by a wide margin this year. You don't know shite.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80462 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

They out recruited all Texas schools talent for talent by a wide margin this year.


2017 Top 50 Texas Players Signed:

A&M - 7
Oklahoma - 6
t.u. - 6
TCU - 4
Texas Tech - 1

Top 100:

A&M - 12
t.u. - 10
Oklahoma - 8
TCU - 7
Baylor - 6
Texas Tech - 4
Texas State - 2
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58131 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

North Carolina schools - never see one of them bolting from the ACC.


would rather have the Carolina school that cares about football.

This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 4:39 pm
Posted by kbrake37
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2016
3094 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 5:04 pm to
I'm for ECU too. We get the state and they love football. After 20 years of TV money they would catch up facility wise.

Texas? No thanks. We don't need them. Oklahoma? What do they bring? They're like West Virginia to me, very small population. WV only has 1.8 million people
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Might because they were not any good like here in the SEC


Stop trying to act like you are an SEC fan
Posted by Boomer00
Member since Sep 2015
3376 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 5:14 pm to
Let's see the numbers for total 5/4 stars from Texas.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80462 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Let's see the numbers for total 5/4 stars from Texas.


Considering that only #49 and #50 in the state were 3 star players, A&M, Oklahoma, and t.u. all had 6 apiece while TCU had 4.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

So where does Boren and OU get this overinflated opinion of their academics?


Because the B1G whispers that crap in their ears. B12 was a conference but look what happened when they whispered into Nebraska's ear. Nebraska fell for it hook, line, and sinker. Even after they got kicked out of the AAU (it was the B1G votes that got them booted) they still think they are equal. Big 12 has 7 AAU schools and just 3 a few years later. You have to be deluded to believe the B1G is there to help you,
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119521 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 6:30 pm to
Thread still going? OU or UT aren't coming to the SEC. They won't be invited, and they won't come.

It would require 4 slots.

when the SEC expands, it will be NC State and VA/Va Tech.
Posted by 4Ghost
Member since Sep 2016
8521 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 7:38 pm to
The ACC does not want nor do they need the "shorthorns"!
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

So where does Boren and OU get this overinflated opinion of their academics?

They are very proud of their number of National Merit Scholar freshman enrolled students, which is usually near or at the top in the country.

LINK

I'm not sure the University of Texas even recruits National Merit Scholars any longer, but I don't think that's a slight to the National Merit Scholar program, just the admissions constraints placed on the University of Texas by the state legislature. That part is purely political and I won't get into it.

There is no doubt that Oklahoma has a huge white-trash fandom, but they do have some money.

I agree their academic profile is overrated.

They were the ones who went belly-up in the 30s and had to move to California (the Dust Bowl, the Grapes of Wrath, etc.) -- which by the way I think confirms Oklahoma's destiny as a California-linked school) -- while Texans struck oil and had money running out of its ears.

That's part of the rivalry (the disparity, the grudge, an inferiority complex takes the hate up a notch from the perceived lesser team). It's psychology, dude.

David Boren, their president, is a politician (a former Gov. and U.S. Senator) who has major connections (he's a Clinton confidante, I think). He's just trying to raise money by blowing smoke. They are trying to attract Texas students who are no longer able to get into certain state schools).

Texas has longed to be linked with Berkeley and Stanford at least since the 1970s. An inferiority complex creeping up from the University of Texas blowhard, wild-spending alumni desiring such link, or liberal academicians who naturally look down on what they perceive (for right or for wrong) inferior institutions?

The latter (UT professors who got their degrees from Berkeley, Stanford, MIT, Harvard, NYU) are vehemently opposed to an association with the Southeastern Conference and I would venture aren't exactly enamored with the Big 12.

The wild-spending money boosters have different motivations and tilt toward athletics success, whatever that may mean.

It creates a natural tension. This, my friends, is what people mean when they say Texas is a tough job. You have to please politicians, professors and Billy Bob. That is undeniable and only Darrell Royal and Mack Brown have been able to do it. Coach Royal got sick of it eventually. Mack Brown got his head chopped off when he wouldn't go away quietly and refused to believe the old adage, "it's nothing personal, just business."
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Did the director of programming for NBC specifically imply that priority broadcasts would be given to schools whose athletes commit to Notre Dame? If not, the two instances aren't even remotely comparable.

No, it's worse than that. They named the recruit, the school and the coach in the same medium.

If ESPN giving Texas money makes ESPN a Texas booster, so does NBC giving Notre Dame money make NBC a Notre Dame booster.

Here's the rule:
quote:

13.10.3 Radio/TV Show. A member institution shall not permit a prospective student-athlete or a high school, college preparatory school or two-year college coach to appear, be interviewed or otherwise be involved (in person or via film, audio tape or videotape) on:

(a) A radio or television program conducted by the institution's coach;

(b) A program in which the institution's coach is participating;

or (c) A program for which a member of the institution's athletics staff has been instrumental in arranging for the appearance of the prospective student-athlete or coach or related program material.


For Texas, let's go a, b and c:

a. Conducted by coach? No.

b. UT coach participating in the event? No. Does recruiting someone equal to participating in the Radio/TV event, which in this case is contractually limited to "high school championship games"? No.

Contract language for Longhorn Network clearly states UT is only obligated to give "best efforts" to procure the contract to show "high-school football championships." Any appearance by a Texas Longhorns recruit in a high-school football championship game would be purely coincidental and in no way prearranged.

c. A program for which a member of the institution's athletics staff has been instrumental in arranging for the appearance of the prospective student-athlete or coach or related program material. ------ NO, the championship game appearances are purely random and UT Austin has no control over who wins high-school football games.

Notre Dame a, b, c:

a: Conducted by coach? Not necessarily, they are not publishing this story at the urging of the Notre Dame coach.

b. Notre Dame coach participating in the event? Yes, definitely, this Internet story is hosted by NBC Sports, which has a multimillion dollar contract with Notre Dame and is therefore considered a booster (just as ESPN with the Longhorn Network is considered under your interpretation of the rules), and features an activity or event conducted by the Notre Dame coach, whose picture appears on the website, which is named "irish.nbcsports.com," namely the recruitment of a prospective student-athlete, who is named specifically in the story.

c. Who gives a shite, the "or" means that B already disqualified the multimedia distribution so I won't even bother.

What is the difference? "Radio/TV" versus "website."

How is this fair? It is still promoting a school and a recruit by a booster over a popular medium.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80462 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:26 pm to
You said CHAMPIONSHIPS.

The individual in question wanted to broadcast regular season games specifically featuring commits and to use it as an incentive for coaches to push their kids towards Austin. He even named an out of state recruit and said their events were fair game as well.

Not only that, but it then would have opened the door for non-football high school events as well had the NCAA not squashed it.

NBC's sole sports property is not Notre Dame football. In fact, at the time the deal was signed, their prime sports deal was with the NBA.
This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 9:29 pm
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

The individual in question wanted to broadcast regular season games specifically featuring commits and to use it as an incentive for coaches to push their kids towards Austin. He even named an out of state recruit and said their events were fair game as well.

Again, this goes back to your supposition that ESPN is acting as a booster for the University of Texas. I disagree with that interpretation.

There was no obligation whatsoever for UT officials to prearrange potential recruits in a regular-season high-school contest.

quote:

Not only that, but it then would have opened the door for non-football high school events as well had the NCAA not squashed it

That is pure speculation.

quote:

NBC's sole sports property is not Notre Dame football. In fact, at the time the deal was signed, their prime sports deal was with the NBA.

Neither is the University of Texas the sole sports property of ESPN. Trying to differentiate like that would be akin to saying the SEC Network was ESPN's sole sports property because it features only SEC teams.
This post was edited on 4/5/17 at 9:37 pm
Posted by GenghisKhan
Gulf Coast
Member since Aug 2016
960 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:35 pm to
aTm gave the SEC a market in Texas. I find OU an interesting addition as I think it would actually add to the Texas market. Dallas and Fort Worth are eat up with OU alum and fans. That would further say screw the Horns!
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80462 posts
Posted on 4/5/17 at 9:36 pm to
That's like saying CNN wasn't a booster of the Democrat party in 2016.

quote:

Neither is the University of Texas the sole sports property of ESPN. Trying to differentiate like that would be akin to saying the SEC Network was ESPN's sole sports property because it features only SEC teams.


The sole sports focus of the Longhorn Network is t.u. sports.

At the time of the Notre Dame deal (1992), NBC only had sports on its main broadcast network. Notice that NBCSports doesn't broadcast anything related to Notre Dame except in reruns.

The sole sports property OF THE SEC NETWORK is the Southeastern Conference and its members.

Surely you can't be this dense.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 11:25 am
Posted by Richt_TheU
Member since Sep 2016
168 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:48 am to
But would the SEC still be bigger than a B1G with Oklahoma and Texas? I think it actually makes the most sense for them to join the PAC12, but I don't think the SEC would really care if they joined that Conference. I do think the SEC would care if they joined the ACC, but it doesn't seem like they'd be a good fit in the ACC. The only B12 team I can see the ACC getting would be WVU.

As far as expansion is concerned, if the SEC decides to expand, other than Texas and Oklahoma the only other schools that would be a good addition to the SEC would be ACC teams, but no ACC school can leave the conference until like 2035, due to the Grant of Rights that was just signed like 2yrs ago. And ND is contractually obligated to the ACC until then also so you can't pull them in.

But I see something like this eventually happening: LINK
Posted by houstonag
Member since Jun 2013
160 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 3:54 am to
This conversation is all for naught UT thinks they are better than the SEC. It's just not going to happen.
Posted by OldSchoolHorn
Aspen CO
Member since Nov 2014
3999 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 5:19 am to
quote:

To be fair, Patterson is proof this is not true. Look I feel sorry for you guys hiring him and he did more to wreck Texas than any team in the old B12 did. Dodds probably was retained too long and I blame Brown for diluting the Texas schedule for more wins. If you really are a Texas fan do you really think I am wrong here? I respected DKR for scheduling but Mack Brown scheduled for his own end.


I'd say Patterson is proof.

They ran that freak out of Austin pretty quick and laced his pocket with millions.

I think of Brown as in diluting the roster, but yes.. Texas hung on waaaay too long there. I remember some A&M guys calling that b4 it even started sliding. I was in denial til year 2 of his spiral downward.

Friends cousin went to work as the asst S&C and had some crazy stories about Brown and his staff.. short of a Baylor or Penn St culture, those 5-7 years under Brown shockingly a pathetic display of narcissism and delusion by Mack Daddy.

Brown makes Hugh freeze look like an amateur when it comes to "creative freedom" in regards to reality.
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter