Started By
Message
LSU - would you go through another Dinardo again to get to another Saban?
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:14 pm
And if you get him,what do you change to keep him?
14
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:18 pm to TideTurf
He left for the NFL.
He did not leave for another college.
Nothing you can do about that, guy wanted to compete at the highest level.
He did not leave for another college.
Nothing you can do about that, guy wanted to compete at the highest level.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:19 pm to TideTurf
Would you go with another Shula to get Saban dipshit?
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:23 pm to TideTurf
quote:
LSU - would you go through another Dinardo again to get to another Saban?
We kind of are right now
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:25 pm to TideTurf
The answer, of course, is yes. In many ways the Dinardo years were actually a helluva lot of fun, and they contributed to the success that would follow with Saban.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:31 pm to TideTurf
Dinardo wasn't bad. His decision to hire Lou Tepper was very very very very BAD.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 12:55 pm to TideTurf
Hard to say. Saban was not SABAN until his 4th year at LSU. Before that he averaged 4 losses a year ( 2000 8-4, 2001 9-3, 2002 8-5) and even after his national championship he lost 2 games and the bowl game the next year.
You cannot tell really how good a guy is going to be. By resume alone Bill Walsh should have taken Stanford to the Rose Bowl each year and won a national championship and corraled the best recruits in the nation who had 3.0's or better in high school. Didn't happen.
You cannot tell really how good a guy is going to be. By resume alone Bill Walsh should have taken Stanford to the Rose Bowl each year and won a national championship and corraled the best recruits in the nation who had 3.0's or better in high school. Didn't happen.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 1:01 pm to TideTurf
Dinardo? Sure
Curley Hallman? Hell No!
Curley Hallman? Hell No!
Posted on 9/22/16 at 1:04 pm to TideTurf
Dinardo was no Curley.
...after all, Curley was a Bear disciple.
...after all, Curley was a Bear disciple.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 1:53 pm to TideTurf
We may be and whatever it takes.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 1:54 pm to TideTurf
Dinardo actually wasn't awful especially since he had to fix Curly hallmans atrocity.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 1:57 pm to TideTurf
I liked Dinardo.
He took over a team that hadn't had a winning record in 6 seasons.
He won 7 his first year, 10 the following, and then 9 after that. He hired Lou Tepper and then all went downhill.
He took over a team that hadn't had a winning record in 6 seasons.
He won 7 his first year, 10 the following, and then 9 after that. He hired Lou Tepper and then all went downhill.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 8:52 pm to TideTurf
Dumb thread. DiNardo was not liked by the fans because he was more of a pal to the players than an authoritative figure. The guys knows a hell of a lot about football. But sometimes that doesn't always translate to success on the field. Educate yourselves.
Posted on 9/22/16 at 9:30 pm to TideTurf
I'm afraid it won't go that well but I hope I'm wrong
Posted on 9/23/16 at 1:45 am to TideTurf
Ironic that you mention Dinardo during Les' reign, considering that they've coached together.
Dinardo had to clean up Hallman's mess and somewhat did actually. It's just that he just fell out of favorability with the team and fans. We had climbed out of the Hallman dungeon, but it was time to go to the NEXT level.
The players also complained when he switched up to Two-a-days more often as they lost more games. It's like driving faster once you see that you're going off the cliff.
I'm no Dinardo fan, but I do believe he'd do slightly better by today's standards. In fact, a lot like Les Miles. He's what we needed at the time.
All the fans want to see is a liiiiiittle bit more offense. And proper QB development. I think we'd consider almost anyone right now that looked to change our offensive identity.
Dinardo had to clean up Hallman's mess and somewhat did actually. It's just that he just fell out of favorability with the team and fans. We had climbed out of the Hallman dungeon, but it was time to go to the NEXT level.
The players also complained when he switched up to Two-a-days more often as they lost more games. It's like driving faster once you see that you're going off the cliff.
I'm no Dinardo fan, but I do believe he'd do slightly better by today's standards. In fact, a lot like Les Miles. He's what we needed at the time.
All the fans want to see is a liiiiiittle bit more offense. And proper QB development. I think we'd consider almost anyone right now that looked to change our offensive identity.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News