Started By
Message

Georgia Tech's SEC storied past

Posted on 5/26/15 at 10:57 pm
Posted by Chris_topher
Member since Sep 2012
7674 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 10:57 pm
Was it a wise decision to leave?

This years incoming freshman class has the highest SAT average of any public school in the country and averages 9 completed AP classes. Students came from all 50 states and over 60 countries. It is also 39% female. Also of interest, 51% caucasian, 28% Asian, 7.6% Hispanic, and 6% African-American.

The engineering department earns more in grant money each year than the entire athletics department revenue combined between Oregon, Texas, Michigan, Alabama, and Ohio State...the top five earning athletics programs in the country.





Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25909 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Was it a wise decision to leave?


No. They may be schools first, but conferences are athletic conferences.

The money the SEC alone is enough to give my answer.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:01 pm to
Ga Tech has all of that, but they're in a P5 conference still.

So they'd have all of what you listed, plus shitloads of SEC money. The answer is no.

But thanks for making room for tFlagship.
Posted by BugaPainTrain7
Oxford, MS
Member since Nov 2014
11567 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:02 pm to
I would have enjoyed having GT in the SEC. The rivalry between yall and UGA would have more implications than just bragging rights
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

This years incoming freshman class has the highest SAT average of any public school in the country and averages 9 completed AP classes. Students came from all 50 states and over 60 countries. It is also 39% female. Also of interest, 51% caucasian, 28% Asian, 7.6% Hispanic, and 6% African-American.

The engineering department earns more in grant money each year than the entire athletics department revenue combined between Oregon, Texas, Michigan, Alabama, and Ohio State...the top five earning athletics programs in the country.


What does any of this have to do with GT leaving the SEC? Are you suggesting that GT would have been less of an academic/engineering school had that stayed in the SEC?
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40916 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

The engineering department earns more in grant money each year than the entire athletics department revenue combined between Oregon, Texas, Michigan, Alabama, and Ohio State...the top five earning athletics programs in the country.


The fact that you think grant money has anything to do with athletic department money probably means the SEC made a good move in letting you walk.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
29515 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

It is also 39% female.



You do realize this is low, right?



I think Georgia Tech has grown at the same rate it would have in the SEC. Just because Louisville is in the ACC, it doesn't mean UL is suddenly a top tier university that isn't plagued by guido douchebags.



This post was edited on 5/26/15 at 11:08 pm
Posted by DoreonthePlains
Auburn, AL
Member since Nov 2013
7436 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Ga Tech has all of that, but they're in a P5 conference still.

So they'd have all of what you listed, plus shitloads of SEC money. The answer is no.


Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but are you forgetting that the ACC is a P5 conference? I'm not saying they wouldn't have MORE money now than they do in the ACC, but it is still a P5 conference.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25909 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:10 pm to
quote:


Ga Tech has all of that, but they're in a P5 conference still.




quote:

but are you forgetting that the ACC is a P5 conference?


Geeze, I'm starting to think that the reputations of GT and Vandy are not well-earned.

Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20257 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

You do realize this is low, right?

Not for GT. I think it was around 30% when I was deciding between UGA and GT
Posted by DoreonthePlains
Auburn, AL
Member since Nov 2013
7436 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:14 pm to
The way he continued made it seem like they weren't making any money from athletics though, as if the "but they're in a P5 conference still" was a hypothetical statement about if they had stayed in the SEC.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
29515 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:19 pm to
I just checked out their athletic facilities. Damn, Tech would kill for some SECN money right about now.


I remember Tech used to have such a good baseball program. I could see why they're slipping with that shithole
Posted by pivey14
In Your Head
Member since Mar 2012
15445 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

conferences are athletic conferences.


This, and the SEC offers the most money.
This post was edited on 5/26/15 at 11:39 pm
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:36 pm to
It probably wasn't a good idea for Dodd to get into a pissing match with the Bear.
Posted by SamuelClemens
Earth
Member since Feb 2015
11727 posts
Posted on 5/26/15 at 11:46 pm to
I wish both GIT and Tulane were still in the SEC
Posted by Mister Tee
On the Lake
Member since Jun 2014
2761 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 12:23 am to
Add me to the list who wish they were still in the SEC. They are solid athletically on a continuous basis with the academic limitations that they have. And scream athletics all you want, but strong academic schools bring a lot to the conference as well. There are reasons West Virginia never made it to the SEC during the last round of expansions...and it wasn't because of their lack of potential to improve athletic facilities. They, too, could have done some good things with SEC money.
Posted by WorkinDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
9341 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 12:24 am to
Since Grant money is for Grants and stuff, and athletic money is for athletics; how many 4 ticket, 4 hot dogs and 4 coke family packs do you have to sell to match Oregon, Texas or Bama? I'm no engineer but my guess is a lot.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 12:29 am to
quote:

Add me to the list who wish they were still in the SEC. They are solid athletically on a continuous basis with the academic limitations that they have. And scream athletics all you want, but strong academic schools bring a lot to the conference as well. There are reasons West Virginia never made it to the SEC during the last round of expansions...and it wasn't because of their lack of potential to improve athletic facilities. They, too, could have done some good things with SEC money.

They've also won more national titles in football and been to more Final Fours in men's basketball than Georgia.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 12:29 am to
I know a girl who got outright denied at UGA, but was accepted at Tech



-Signed,

Your future lawyer
Posted by Mister Tee
On the Lake
Member since Jun 2014
2761 posts
Posted on 5/27/15 at 12:57 am to
And they've been to regionals in baseball 30 times compared to Mississippi State's 34, Florida's 31, Arkansas's 27, and LSU's 28 times.

They've also won 17 conference championships in golf...which is way more than a lot of SEC teams.

They are a solid school both academically and athletically no matter how much you may dislike them.

Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter