Started By
Message
Forbes: Most Valuable Conferences 1) B1G, 2) PAC, 4) SEC
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:22 pm
LINK /
1. Big Ten
Total income: $310 million
Bowl games: $40 million
2. Pac-12
Total income: $303 million
Bowl games: $39 million
3. ACC
Total income: $293 million
Bowl games: $35 million
4. SEC
Total income: $270 million
Bowl games: $50 million
1. Big Ten
Total income: $310 million
Bowl games: $40 million
2. Pac-12
Total income: $303 million
Bowl games: $39 million
3. ACC
Total income: $293 million
Bowl games: $35 million
4. SEC
Total income: $270 million
Bowl games: $50 million
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:23 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Your life must really suck.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:23 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Most of our money is hidden in cash with the bagmen.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:23 pm to nebraskafaninwi
So the totals don't include the SEC Network.
quote:
The SEC will soon reap a double benefit from being the nation's top football conference. The conference annually maxes out its BCS revenue (nearly $30 million this year) in addition to playing in some of the more valuable non-BCS bowls, like the Outback Bowl. Meanwhile its superior football play will soon attract the nation's richest TV deal for a college conference.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:25 pm to TheCheshireHog
It also doesn't include the TV contracts that the B1G will negotiate in 2016.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:26 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
It also doesn't include the TV contracts that the B1G will negotiate in 2016.
So it's a worthless list full of inaccurate data. Got it.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:27 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
Jan 16, 2013
That's over 2 years old now...
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:27 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
It also doesn't include the TV contracts that the B1G will negotiate in 2016
wait, you're telling me they didn't include something that hasn't occurred yet?
bastards
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:28 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Who put you in charge of Forbes?
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:29 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Collectively schools of the SEC pay their head football coaches around $60,000,000/year. I'd wager pretty good money that the ledger would swing in the SEC's favor, all things considered.
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:30 pm to nebraskafaninwi
edit. Why care about this? Can't you guys just watch the games and shut up..?
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:31 pm to GIbson05
quote:Not to defend a him, but SEC was probably more profitable two years ago than it is now. Had UK winning basketball and had dominated football for 6 years. Plus you had LSU and MSU in the world series while USC was coming off back to back championships.
That's over 2 years old now
I don't get why it's so hard for most of y'all to look at the conferences objectively.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:35 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Nebraska has little or nothing to do with the money the BIG makes. Your state has a smaller population than Mississippi and your team has become as irrelevant or more irrelevant than the schools in Mississippi
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:36 pm to WhitewaterDawg
WhitewaterDawg with the first blow
SQUADDDDD
SQUADDDDD
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:36 pm to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
SEC was probably more profitable two years ago than it is now
Fair enough but the SEC Network $ is not represented. Each school is getting $26M in profits.
Blows away anything from 2013
Posted on 5/7/15 at 3:39 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Whatever makes you feel better. No one is even coming close to the new facilities the programs across the SEC are throwing up, so I'm not sure what the Big 10 members are doing with that money.
I will say Nebraska has excellent athletic facilities, albeit the baseball stadium and arena have more credit to partnering with the city and a minor league team
I will say Nebraska has excellent athletic facilities, albeit the baseball stadium and arena have more credit to partnering with the city and a minor league team
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News