Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:04 pm to NYCAuburn
You guys are dumbasses.
"Big 6"??? Really???
Sounds like you guys would really prefer the old deep 6.
"Big 6"??? Really???
Sounds like you guys would really prefer the old deep 6.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:04 pm to mboromaroon
quote:
You guys are dumbasses.
"Big 6"??? Really???
Somebody doesnt know about the big 6 either
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:04 pm to NYCAuburn
Only 1 Big 6 member didn't even play for a BCS title.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:05 pm to msu202020
quote:
Only teams ranked number 1 in the College Football Playoff Poll can be in the big 6.
Well, since this is the first year ever, for the playoff poll, I guess MSU is the best team ever in college football history.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:06 pm to Legendary0903
quote:We've never required NCs as the only measure of relevance in the Big6. Hell, Auburn is a member of the Big6 and until 2010 they hadn't won an NC in over 50 years.
NCs are the only measure of relevance. Ours was a while back, but 16 years more relevant than UGA's.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:08 pm to Korin
quote:
Only 1 Big 6 member didn't even play for a BCS title.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:10 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Somebody doesnt know about the big 6 either
No, I know what you guys are referring to, and you're a bunch of dumbasses struggling for an identity. If you were really confident in your programs you wouldn't be longing for a stupid designation. That's something a bunch of high school pussies would do.
Plus, none of you individual dicksniffers ever accomplished a thing.... other than being dumbasses.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:11 pm to TheDude321
quote:
Well, since this is the first year ever, for the playoff poll, I guess MSU is the best team ever in college football history.
College football didn't exist before this season.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:15 pm to mboromaroon
For what it's worth, MSU was actually an original member of the Big 6, but was later evicted:
CHARTER MEMBERS OF THE BIG SIX (SEC titles in parentheses)
Alabama (1933, '34, '37)
Tulane (1934, '39)
LSU (1935, '36)
Tennessee (1938, '39, '40)
Georgia Tech (1939)
Mississippi State (1941)
CHARTER MEMBERS OF THE BIG SIX (SEC titles in parentheses)
Alabama (1933, '34, '37)
Tulane (1934, '39)
LSU (1935, '36)
Tennessee (1938, '39, '40)
Georgia Tech (1939)
Mississippi State (1941)
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:15 pm to mboromaroon
quote:
No, I know what you guys are referring to, and you're a bunch of dumbasses struggling for an identity. If you were really confident in your programs you wouldn't be longing for a stupid designation. That's something a bunch of high school pussies would do.
Plus, none of you individual dicksniffers ever accomplished a thing.... other than being dumbasses.
Sorry you're not in. Try harder.
This post was edited on 11/3/14 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:20 pm to mboromaroon
quote:
you're a bunch of dumbasses struggling for an identity. If you were really confident in your programs you wouldn't be longing for a stupid designation. That's something a bunch of high school pussies would do.
You do realize the conference itself came up with the moniker? Dont you?
quote:someones vag is dripping
Plus, none of you individual dicksniffers ever accomplished a thing.... other than being dumbasses.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:27 pm to mboromaroon
quote:
No, I know what you guys are referring to, and you're a bunch of dumbasses struggling for an identity. If you were really confident in your programs you wouldn't be longing for a stupid designation. That's something a bunch of high school pussies would do.
Plus, none of you individual dicksniffers ever accomplished a thing.... other than being dumbasses.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:32 pm to Swagga
The first non-big6 SEC title in 50 years would warrant some modification. Being that the "Big 6" all have multiple titles in that time period, it would not warrant full-fledged inclusion, but should warrant exclusion from the little 8.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:36 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
You do realize the conference itself came up with the moniker?
I think that the SEC office tries to discourage its use. The media does push it though:
Posted on 11/3/14 at 3:11 pm to engie
quote:
The first non-big6 SEC title in 50 years would warrant some modification. Being that the "Big 6" all have multiple titles in that time period, it would not warrant full-fledged inclusion, but should warrant exclusion from the little 8.
Win the first playoff era NC and you can exit the little 8,and be on the Big 6 bubble.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News