Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/15/14 at 7:05 am to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Have you ever accidentally called out Peter Buck's e-name during sex?
That's funny right there.
I still think the kid playing in traffic deserves what he gets. If it happens to Tony Stewart next time he gets out of the car and acts a fool he asked for it too. It's absolutely retarded to get out of a car and walk in front of another.
Posted on 8/16/14 at 8:02 am to bbqdawg
Better explaination of how a sprint car works
The driver (Ken Schrader) who stopped with #3 was involved in the crash and had a damaged car that couldn't make it around. The cars right behind the accident didn't stop either to help. The silver bullet car (Marlin I believe)who turned #3 did not stop on the way by the next lap to help either. And for to say Stewart should have seen him I don't think drivers can turn their heads that much with the side support arms off the seats and the HANS device tethers holding their helmet back. Again, tragic ACCIDENT.
quote:
ALso, the Earnhardt fatality is a totally different thing because it was an in car crash, right?. Even still though...... I don't remember who it was, but one of the drivers involved in the crash with Senior got out of his car and was the first one to get to Dale. As soon as he looked inside the car, he started waving his arms in a panic for the medics because he could see how serious it was.
The driver (Ken Schrader) who stopped with #3 was involved in the crash and had a damaged car that couldn't make it around. The cars right behind the accident didn't stop either to help. The silver bullet car (Marlin I believe)who turned #3 did not stop on the way by the next lap to help either. And for to say Stewart should have seen him I don't think drivers can turn their heads that much with the side support arms off the seats and the HANS device tethers holding their helmet back. Again, tragic ACCIDENT.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 3:18 pm to K9
Posted on 9/24/14 at 4:14 pm to DawgCountry
terrible bump...I was hoping this thread got deleted 
Posted on 9/24/14 at 4:16 pm to K9
When I read this I saw "another" and thought it happened again.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 6:06 pm to retooc
I did too.
Heard the toxicology report came back for the deceased....and he was racing with Mary Jane.
Heard the toxicology report came back for the deceased....and he was racing with Mary Jane.
Posted on 9/24/14 at 6:10 pm to K9
Haha. Lotta fail in this thread. Needed to bring it back 
Posted on 9/24/14 at 7:07 pm to DawgCountry
Tricked me. I read killed another and thought he killed another another. Like did it again.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:08 am to DawgCountry
Yeah, so Tony not even charged and Ward's toxicology came back that he was high on weed.
All you clowns who went on a witch hunt after Stewart should be ashamed and eating a fat plate of crow.
All you clowns who went on a witch hunt after Stewart should be ashamed and eating a fat plate of crow.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:15 am to BeefDawg
quote:
Ward's toxicology came back that he was high on weed.
I havent read it.
Did they say in his system..like smoked days before or they thought he lit up day of race?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:40 am to retooc
quote:
All you clowns who went on a witch hunt after Stewart should be ashamed and eating a fat plate of crow.
quote:
Did they say in his system..like smoked days before or they thought he lit up day of race?
Yes, they said based on the levels, he was high at the time of the incident
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:15 am to BeefDawg
quote:
All you clowns who went on a witch hunt after Stewart should be ashamed and eating a fat plate of crow.
So predictable…………
This is about as moronic as someone saying, “See! I told you OJ was innocent!!” after the jury verdict was read in the OJ Simpson case…..
All this means is that a grand jury decided there wasn’t sufficient evidence to charge Stewart with a crime. It doesn’t mean Stewart didn’t do any of the things that people have speculated about in this thread which you so cowardly refer to as a “witch hunt”.
I said from the beginning that I didn’t think that Stewart should be charged with a crime. This ruling is not shocking or disappointing in the slightest bit for me. But, it also doesn’t answer a single one of the disturbing questions I have about what happened that night either…………………Stewart is the only one who knows the truth.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:25 am to retooc
quote:
Did they say in his system..like smoked days before or they thought he lit up day of race?
I doubt that there's a legal definition for this.......
It could mean that he was baked out of his mind that night, i guess. But, it could also just as easily mean that he smoked a bowl the night BEFORE maybe. We don't know.
Regardless............what does smoking pot have to do with Tony Stewart's actions? How does Ward having some vague levels of marijuana in his system affect Stewart's car?...making him the only one not to slow or to see ward or to make Stewart accelerate or to be the only car unable to avoid hitting Ward?
Have people who are saying this maijuana angle totally absolves Tony Stewart even thought this through?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:35 am to Jefferson Dawg
My incredibly unprofessional guess is the only thing the toxicology report did was make it impossible for a case against Stewart to succeed. I agree with you, Jeff, in that the fact the kid may or may not have been high doesn't really absolve Stewart of anything. I guess, though, is that legally he's pretty much untouchable because of it and a lot of people are now rolling with the idea that Stewart was clearly innocent.
People always want it to be black and white when it's almost always shades of gray.
People always want it to be black and white when it's almost always shades of gray.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:33 am to Damn Good Dawg
Now it's time for the civil suit though. I don't think he's getting out of that one
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:53 am to DawgCountry
Oh yeah. He gon pay some money to that family.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:56 am to retooc
For what? The family raised a kid that walked in front of a moving car.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 11:01 am to SneakyWaff1es
Rarely is a civil case like this won by a famous/rich defendant.
My opinion is that it was an accident, but if you're asking what I think will happen. Tony will lose a civil case.
My opinion is that it was an accident, but if you're asking what I think will happen. Tony will lose a civil case.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 11:03 am to retooc
You think? Even with the toxicology report? I am not saying being high really should impact it but I figured a good attorney could pretty much rely on reefer madness to win the day. Unless Stewart just wants to pay them off to end it.
Page 11 of 12
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News