Started By
Message
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:43 am to goldennugget
You started almost an identical thread yesterday
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:45 am to LL012697
Between Missouri and Louisiana
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:45 am to lowspark12
quote:This is the biggest question mark.
The issue will be can they find and develop the athletes necessary to compete on defense?
They were dead last in the SEC last year in scoring defense vs conference (37.9 ppg). MSU & UF (7 came off a pick six) were the only SEC team that scored less than 30 points on them.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:46 am to LL012697
quote:
You started almost an identical thread yesterday
Some big fat dude from Arkansas must have laid the pipe to his old lady
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:47 am to ArmyHogs
quote:
A&M is below the Hogs so no reason to discuss them.
Last I checked A&M is undefeated against the razorfricks in SEC play
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:51 am to goldennugget
quote:
No LSU, Missouri, or A&M fans allowed since they seem to have ADS(Arkansas Derangement Syndrome)
You left out possibly the biggest: Auburn.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:54 am to goldennugget
I think they'll be a solid 8-9 win team. I like Bielema a lot.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:56 am to goldennugget
Hiring a new coach with walmarks gift cards.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:58 am to goldennugget
golden nugget.
The pigz cuckold.
The pigz cuckold.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 10:59 am to goldennugget
Pretty much still North of Louisiana.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 11:01 am to Stonehog
quote:
No it isn't, if that were the case then Sporting News wouldn't have ranked him ahead of Sumlin.
Sporting news considers what he did in the Big 10 to be relevant. I do not.
ETA: Just like I wouldnt be trying to swing a 1 inch dick around if Sumlin got to a BCS game at UH. Who cares how you perform in the minor league, when you've had a season in the majors.
This post was edited on 5/23/14 at 11:04 am
Posted on 5/23/14 at 11:02 am to goldennugget
quote:
Unbiased posters only: Where do you see Arkansas in 4 years?
Honestly, who knows? IMO they could be competing for titles like 2011 with other juggernauts or near the bottom.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 11:02 am to MMB5DAP
quote:
Sporting news considers what he did in the Big 10 to be relevant. I do not.
Who gives a shite?
Posted on 5/23/14 at 11:09 am to goldennugget
- grinding it out behind an awesome offense line
- struggling with running & passing game outside the hashes
- squashing the passing game between the hashes
- difficulty stopping the better run teams at second level (LB's)
- much much better S/Teams
I'm thinking very similar to the Nutt/DMac years. Which is good enough for anywhere between 2-3rd consistently in the W, with shots at the W title.
- struggling with running & passing game outside the hashes
- squashing the passing game between the hashes
- difficulty stopping the better run teams at second level (LB's)
- much much better S/Teams
I'm thinking very similar to the Nutt/DMac years. Which is good enough for anywhere between 2-3rd consistently in the W, with shots at the W title.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 11:13 am to Stonehog
quote:
Who gives a shite?
What was his B1G record against quality teams?
Posted on 5/23/14 at 11:15 am to goldennugget
If they are happy with roughly 6 to 7 wins a year Bert will still be there, if not they will be looking for a new coach. I've always thought Bert was a bad fit for the SEC.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 11:15 am to goldennugget
Honestly I do not think Bert is the answer. They will be in the 1st year of a new coach in 4 years.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News