MMB5DAP
| Favorite team: | Texas A&M  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1779 |
| Registered on: | 7/18/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
Rebuild? Y'all will be worse next year!
Probably but transfer portal is different. We replaced all WR from last year and got way better.
0
re: Miami Hurricanes vs Texas A&M and the 12th Man.
Posted by MMB5DAP on 12/9/25 at 3:10 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
This is a horrendous matchup for Aggie. Miami might have the best run D in the country. Their weakness as a secondary is big X WR's or a high efficiency west coast passing attack. A&M uses quick slot receivers and is low efficiency/reliant on big plays. Defensively A&M's secondary is meh, they can't stop the run and are heavily reliant on their pass rush. Miami has one of, if not the best pass pro OL's in the country. Miami's weakness on offense is ball hawking secondary's exploiting Beck's tendency to make bad decisions in close games. SMU ranks 7th in the country in INT's and Louisville ranks 15th. He had 6 picks in those 2 games, which were both single possession games. A&M ranks 2nd to last in the country with 3 INTs all year Couldn't be a worse matchup
Man go to Vegas and hammer Miami moneyline and retire!
:dude:
quote:
Is this a 64 team playoff? WTF are you talking about?
This is potentially the path A&M would have to take to win a championship as the 7 seed.
Without the bye you have to win 4 games :lol:
re: This is how you want a coach responding to bullshite committee rankings
Posted by MMB5DAP on 12/4/25 at 12:52 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
the committee has said from the beginning of the 4 team payoff era began that injuries like that would be taken into account when evaluating teams. whether we agree with it or not isn't relevant.
If I’m a coach then, put my starting QB as out due to undisclosed injury if I’m 11-0 next year to guarantee I don’t slip
quote:
I agree, and I think it does as long as you win that tough OOC game. (As a whole) I mean, all things considered do you take the team that beat the #1 team in the country, or the team that beat Syracuse. If the first team loses to the #1 team in the country what did they prove? Playing a tough OOC game gives an opportunity to make a splash and get a benefit of the doubt. Lost to a tough OOC team and you can't give people style points for scheduling a tough OOC game and lose.
Gotta win the tough OOC agree. It’s a risk reward. I think it’s a big risk to go on the road against Ohio St, ND, etc.
If you schedule and win that game, you should get the nod if the resumes as a whole are close. Otherwise, if you’re SEC or big 10, why would you ever schedule a tough OOC game.
I will say that the Notre dame win for A&M is probably only thing keeping us from getting BYU treatment though so perhaps our win this year is baked in. But again I think in general you should reward teams who schedule and win tough games OOC
quote:
I don't think anybody is saying it doesn't count so much as you have to take it into consideration. You do think that losing your starting QB would hurt a team more than losing a RB, right? Most teams would find it difficult to win with a backup QB who, under normal circumstances would play very little in most games,than a 2nd string RB that probably gets 7-10 touches every single game.
Marcel reed twisted his ankle against Texas in the 1st quarter. If he decided he couldn’t finish the game (out two weeks so not like FSU situation) does the loss get diminished like Texas techs loss to Arizona state?
re: This is how you want a coach responding to bullshite committee rankings
Posted by MMB5DAP on 12/4/25 at 12:20 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
Simple UGA's only loss is to a top 10 team Texas Tech's only loss came in a game without their starting QB (major injuries is something the committee has always said would be taken into account) Oregon's only loss is to the current #2 team Ole Miss' only loss is to the current #3 team in the country A&M's loss came when fully healthy to a team not in the playoffs
Someone has to be the lowest ranked 1 loss team and A&M drew the proverbial short straw. It’s all close enough that I don’t really take issue with it other than my team was the loser in it. Should have beaten Texas to avoid it.
Just a couple thoughts in general:
1.) saying that a teams starter was injured so that terrible loss doesn’t count is so stupid. So if Marcel reed stayed injured against Texas the loss wouldn’t have mattered now?
2.) obviously A&M benefits here but I do think that if things are super close, OOC schedule should be the tiebreaker. This would encourage teams to schedule tougher
ETA: the real problem here at the end of the day is auto bids. 6 seed plays north Texas and 7 seed plays Alabama?
re: CFB Playoff Rankings Tue, 25 Nov
Posted by MMB5DAP on 11/25/25 at 8:23 pm to antibarner
quote:
Question,,,,Should Alabama win out......they would have wins over two of the top 4 teams in that bracket (if Aggy beats UT) and be SEC Champs. In such a scenario where do you seed them and who do they play?
I dunno that’s a great question and could happen.
I think I’d put them minimum as a 5. That Florida state loss really hurting bamas profile as they are #4 right now without it and would have gotten the two with the sec championship
Damn! The top half of that bracket is crazy if it shook out that way.
Ohio state would have to beat Notre dame/OU and Georgia/texas tech. All those teams are good so there’s no “easy” path but rather be 2/3 seed vs 1
Ohio state would have to beat Notre dame/OU and Georgia/texas tech. All those teams are good so there’s no “easy” path but rather be 2/3 seed vs 1
quote:
They beat #4 Florida in 2020. Although that team finished the season #13 and 8-4.
AI way off here for the Aggies, beat #1 Alabama in 2021 I believe, #1 OU in like 2003, 2015 beat #5 Auburn
Edit OU was 2002. 2003 was 77-0 :lol:
quote:
If you remember every team that got the bye lost in the quarterfinals last year
They also did the seeding weird last year. ASU and Boise shouldn’t have been top 4
re: Which scenario gets the most SEC teams in?
Posted by MMB5DAP on 11/18/25 at 6:31 pm to TideWarrior
quote:
Hardy still had over 100+ yards against a&m and OU has a top run defense. His lowest yards yet were against Alabama.
True but on 2 plays really. A&M defense is actually good in general but give up way too many big plays.
Even against South Carolina - a couple 50+ yard TD throws and that was it really
re: SEC COY vote
Posted by MMB5DAP on 11/18/25 at 5:14 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
Elko played the bottom half of the conference.
Yes but he’s doing it at Texas A&M. BAS exists because A&M shits the bed every year and most times against sub par teams (as well as the good ones)
re: Success Rate: Week 12
Posted by MMB5DAP on 11/18/25 at 1:41 pm to International_Aggie
quote:
I'm really trying to make sense of this graph.
If you’re the team on top on the left side where it goes negative, it means you outplayed your opponent but lost due to some combination of turnovers/explosives etc.
If you are the team on top where it’s positive, it means you outplayed your opponent and won the game. The more you outplay your opponent, the more your margin of victory should have been. So if you are like JMU and dominate most plays but barely win can analyze what “bad luck” you may have had.
quote:
He was out all year but might return as early as the SC game.
Shocked :lol:
Doesn’t matter how good someone is if they aren’t available. At A&M I don’t think Stewart ever played half the games in a season
quote:
as is a 1-point kick after touchdown:
So according to your logic, a 7-point game is a two-score lead?
Just thinking about this and the reason A&M won at ND other than the hold :lol:
Believe it was because botched extra point
re: The rankings are a joke this year
Posted by MMB5DAP on 10/30/25 at 11:14 am to ClemsonKitten
Feel like Texas beats vandy. I don’t know, they keep snatching victory from the jaws of defeat. I don’t think there’s really much separation of teams in the SEC this year.
I’ve seen an nfl graphic where it does the old “flip every one score game result”. Wonder what that looks like this year in the SEC
I’ve seen an nfl graphic where it does the old “flip every one score game result”. Wonder what that looks like this year in the SEC
re: Remember When
Posted by MMB5DAP on 10/19/25 at 7:38 am to hookem2522
Nice melt
I didn’t like it when they were able to follow A&M to the SEC but the day after the announcement I didn’t really care.
We’ve been mediocre in the same conference and mediocre in different conferences from Texas. If the only way you can enjoy watching A&M football (as an aggie fan) is if they are winning championships then stop watching IMO.
We’ve been mediocre in the same conference and mediocre in different conferences from Texas. If the only way you can enjoy watching A&M football (as an aggie fan) is if they are winning championships then stop watching IMO.
I mean Clemson had to go on a true road game against a top 10 team and Boise was 2 missed FG from it being a one score game late in the game.
Oregon got blown out worse than both those teams
Oregon got blown out worse than both those teams
quote:
They should not get auto bids. It should be entirely up to the top 12 ranked teams.
I don’t see how you can watch the Texas/ASU game yesterday and come to this conclusion.
Popular
32
