Started By
Message
locked post

Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?

Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:33 pm
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:33 pm
Auburn is a member of the "big 6" as they have won their share of SEC titles and even a recent national title. However they are the only program in the big 6 seemingly unable to sustain an elite level of success over a stretch of consecutive seasons. Auburn's MO seems to be to come out of nowhere to reach a high level of success, only to immediately fall off.

Auburn has had back to back 10 win seasons once in their entire program's history (1988 & 1989).

The last time Auburn managed back to back top #10 AP finishes was 1993-1994.

So what gives?
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123866 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:34 pm to
Got rustled^
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25920 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

However they are the only program in the big 6 seemingly unable to sustain an elite level of success over a stretch of consecutive seasons


UGA and UT say hello.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 4:35 pm
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:35 pm to
response thread

Posted by fontell
Montgomery
Member since Sep 2006
4457 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:36 pm to
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?


Why does Auburn have more conference titles than anyone else the last decade?
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
11463 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:48 pm to
If you go back to 1999 then yes that was the epitome of Auburn football. That was Tommy Tuberville football. We had sustained success in the 80s. I think Gus Malzahn will be the difference now.
Posted by Won3ofTheLast5
Member since Mar 2014
370 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:51 pm to
It will continue. 8 or 9 wins for AU this year.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:51 pm to
Tennessee and UGA have both had consecutive ten win seasons and top 10 finishes more recently than Auburn.
Posted by DropKick70
South Beach
Member since Jul 2011
1043 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:51 pm to
Not reality.

Just a gump.

Fear the thumb.
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9617 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:51 pm to
Auburn is simply the SEC's bipolar team.
Posted by bamagreycoat
Member since Oct 2012
5749 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:52 pm to
I don't know how you define "sustaining success" but AU was good in the 80's, 90'2, 00's and this decade as well. They've won conference championships each decade. This rivalry is so fricking ugly that it's hard for either side to even acknowledge positive things about the other side. When you're so consumed with hatred that you can't tip your hat to greatness, you might need to push away from the table.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:53 pm to
This is a very lil broish thread.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:57 pm to
If you want to use the 10 wins as the benchmark, the biggest reason for AU failure to reach it as much as others has to do with schedule. In the 80s and 90s, AU ended the season with FL, UGA and Bama. They consistantly played TN during those years and rarely had Vandy and KY on the schedule. Prior to 92, AU rarely played LSU or Ole Miss, which had it problems during those years. Use Nine games as a benchmark and see what it looks like since 82.
Posted by mbogo
Member since Oct 2012
2545 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:58 pm to
AU's football history mainly consists of dramatic wins against Bama. It's their identity as a program. Without them AU fans would have little to identify themselves as a program other than a few stellar seasons.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:23 pm to
They don't cheat enough?
Posted by roadhouse
Chicago
Member since Sep 2013
2703 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:26 pm to
Being new to the SEC I don't really know the history, but I'm curious if there's a correlation between great years for Auburn and down years for Alabama?
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:40 pm to
I know this is a troll thread, but the Tigers were pretty damned good under multiple coaches. Shug got overshadowed by the Bear, but he regularly finished with 7-9 (and even a few 10) win seasons most of his career in a time when teams only played 10 games a season. You mention Dye's years, though you failed to mention they won 10 in three out of four seasons, not just two consecutive ones. Auburn's success only looks un-sustained next to Bama's. As far as the Big 6, Auburn probably has the 3rd best history in terms of sustained success over time, after Bama and Tennessee.

I like to troll Auburn as much as the next perfectly reasonable person, but I troll them with facts, like they're hillbilly Gump-wannabes and other trivia you can find on Jeopardy.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 5:44 pm
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20841 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

So what gives?


They go back on probation.
Posted by Othello
the Neptonian Steel Mines
Member since Aug 2013
22970 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:46 pm to
Becsuse they don't know how to handle success.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter