Started By
Message
re: Better running back: Tre Mason or Mark Ingram
Posted on 1/14/14 at 1:24 am to Dplymkr88
Posted on 1/14/14 at 1:24 am to Dplymkr88
quote:As was Ingram winning the Heisman.
This thread is laughable to me.
Mason Averaged more yards per attempt. Even counting last year in Loeffler's garbage offense.
This post was edited on 1/14/14 at 1:40 am
Posted on 1/14/14 at 1:36 am to Rabern57
Meow. Claws out. Let's be honest. Toby Garheart didn't exactly make a case and he was 2nd. I'll stay in the neutral zone tho and say Ingram is a team represented heisman.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 1:47 am to Recruitingjunkie
quote:It was a combination of no bama player ever winning one and there not being any great offensive players to vote for. But winning a Heisman doesn't mean you are better than someone from a different year.
Let's be honest. Toby Garheart didn't exactly make a case and he was 2nd. I'll stay in the neutral zone tho and say Ingram is a team represented heisman.
On any given play Mason showed he was more likely to get more yards than Ingram. Thats a better measuring stick of how good a RB is. Especially the more carries they have.
This post was edited on 1/14/14 at 2:03 am
Posted on 1/14/14 at 2:39 am to AuburnTigers
In college....Ingram. Bar is pretty low for mason from an NFL perspective
Posted on 1/14/14 at 5:00 am to Dplymkr88
quote:So what does that make Ingram?
System RB.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:13 am to We_Need_Cam
This is incredible....everyone from the Gumps said Ingram and everyone from the Barn said Mason. Wow this shocks me
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:25 am to AuburnTigers
I must say Tre is prettier.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:35 am to TideHater
Everyone knows that Jake Holland is the best.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:42 am to TideHater
Both did what they did well
* Saw both RB's capable of taking over games
(Ingram's SC game was huge in 2009)
(Masons Missouri game was huge too)
* Both we're durable in CFB
(For SEC standards both held up good)
* Both had OK OL's during their great seasons
Tough to say with both being such different styled backs and both doing well in SEC play. Plus both were used differently during their careers. Not sure if Ingram ever got 46 carries in a game or even top 30 carries. I wouldn't have mind seeing Ingram doing that a few times because Ingram got stronger has he got more carries. But injury and wearing down a College RB is always a concern. I loved watching Lattimore play, but Spurrier abused him at SC.
* Saw both RB's capable of taking over games
(Ingram's SC game was huge in 2009)
(Masons Missouri game was huge too)
* Both we're durable in CFB
(For SEC standards both held up good)
* Both had OK OL's during their great seasons
Tough to say with both being such different styled backs and both doing well in SEC play. Plus both were used differently during their careers. Not sure if Ingram ever got 46 carries in a game or even top 30 carries. I wouldn't have mind seeing Ingram doing that a few times because Ingram got stronger has he got more carries. But injury and wearing down a College RB is always a concern. I loved watching Lattimore play, but Spurrier abused him at SC.
This post was edited on 1/14/14 at 6:47 am
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:45 am to AuburnTigers
Mason.
Tate is probably still better too.
Tate is probably still better too.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:47 am to gxtigs1
quote:
This is incredible....everyone from the Gumps said Ingram and everyone from the Barn said Mason. Wow this shocks me
Wanna see real incredible? Watch this:
Don't know which was better, but both were light years ahead of Herschel Walker
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:47 am to AuburnTigers
Auburn sucks and it's not even close.
Posted on 1/14/14 at 6:55 am to uabtodd
quote:
both were light years ahead of Herschel Walker
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News