Started By
Message
2013 Forbes CFB Most Valuable Teams
Posted on 12/18/13 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 12/18/13 at 12:44 pm
1. Texas
2. Notre Dame
3. Alabama
4. LSU
5. Michigan
6. Florida
7. OU
8. Georgia
9. Ohio State
10. Nebraska
11. Auburn
12. Arkansas
13. USC (Trojans)
14. Texas A&M
15. Penn State
16. Wisconsin
17. Washington
18. USC (Gamecocks)
19. Oregon
20. Tennessee
LINK
ETA:
2. Notre Dame
3. Alabama
4. LSU
5. Michigan
6. Florida
7. OU
8. Georgia
9. Ohio State
10. Nebraska
11. Auburn
12. Arkansas
13. USC (Trojans)
14. Texas A&M
15. Penn State
16. Wisconsin
17. Washington
18. USC (Gamecocks)
19. Oregon
20. Tennessee
LINK
ETA:
This post was edited on 12/18/13 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 12/18/13 at 12:45 pm to GeorgeReymond
9 in top 20 in a bad year for most of our bigger programs.
Wow.
Wow.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 12:45 pm to GeorgeReymond
3. Alabama
4. LSU
6. Florida
8. Georgia
11. Auburn
12. Arkansas
Big Six
4. LSU
6. Florida
8. Georgia
11. Auburn
12. Arkansas
Big Six
Posted on 12/18/13 at 12:58 pm to GeorgeReymond
A&M? why you so poor?
Posted on 12/18/13 at 1:01 pm to GeorgeReymond
Texas has it easy and Notre Dame has a fricking year round TV deal. Adjust for TV network deals, and Alabama is the most valuable.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 1:04 pm to GeorgeReymond
lol @ 14. Of course, this is the same publication that left us off altogether last year.
There are probably 4 or 5 programs in the country that could initiate the type of stadium redevelopment project A&M has underway. That says a lot, even if it's not included in Forbes' calculus.
A&M also received over $300 million more in private donations this year than Texas. Much of that has to do with new Kyle, which seems to be ignored.
There are probably 4 or 5 programs in the country that could initiate the type of stadium redevelopment project A&M has underway. That says a lot, even if it's not included in Forbes' calculus.
A&M also received over $300 million more in private donations this year than Texas. Much of that has to do with new Kyle, which seems to be ignored.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 1:36 pm to GeorgeReymond
A&M would be more valuable if they got some good looking cheerleaders. What's up with that "yell leader" shite? Hell, bring in some strippers or something, if you don't have enough good looking girls that go to school at A&M.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 1:37 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
12. Arkansas
quote:
14. Texas A&M
LOL @ Aggy
Posted on 12/18/13 at 1:43 pm to GeorgeReymond
Arkansas at 12 is a joke
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:43 pm to GeorgeReymond
Forbes is basing this evaluation on last year's figures? Why?
Either way, from NR to #14 has to be the biggest move in history.....because they have been fricking wrong for at least 5 years.
Either way, from NR to #14 has to be the biggest move in history.....because they have been fricking wrong for at least 5 years.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 2:43 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
4. LSU
Damn nice..I honestly didn't think we would be this high on the list. aTm is down below playing in their oil wells I see ;)
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:38 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
8. Georgia
BEAUTIFUL MONEY
Posted on 12/18/13 at 3:41 pm to GeorgeReymond
Isn't it about to get even better?
SIAP
SIAP
quote:SEC Revenues Set to Jump
How SEC schools potentially reach $34 million apiece in shared conference and NCAA revenues in 2014-15:
Posted on 12/18/13 at 7:39 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
14. Texas A&M
I can't even imagine all the whiny ags in this thread.
Posted on 12/18/13 at 10:24 pm to GeorgeReymond
Guess I missed Missouri
Its not like UM/MU has two massive cities, is centrally located within the state, has an extra 10,000 students, and two federal reserve banks advantage over poor little ole Arkysaw!
Its not like UM/MU has two massive cities, is centrally located within the state, has an extra 10,000 students, and two federal reserve banks advantage over poor little ole Arkysaw!
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News