Started By
Message
re: A&M Ken Doll
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:46 am to cardboardboxer
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:46 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Its 2013 not 1973.
For Pete's sake, it's football. Can actual men not have anything sacred because it's 2013 ?
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:49 am to ccomeaux
quote:
aTm didn't create it but they sure as hell signed off on it's production and negotiated a licensing fee.
So we try to get some chicks to care about our cheerleading squad by pumping out some Barbies and yall bitch about that.
Yall fricking pick- either bitch about us having all dudes or bitch about our attempts to attract future female cheerleaders.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:52 am to ccomeaux
quote:
Can actual men not have anything sacred because it's 2013 ?
Our dudes are sacred to us. We even have an old song we play named after them: "The Noble Men of Kyle."
How about we worry about our traditions and how we shape them, and you worry about yours. Somewhere out there someone needs to suck a tiger dick surely.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:53 am to cardboardboxer
Wait, I think I just rustled my own jimmies.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:54 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
So we try to get some chicks to care about our cheerleading squad by pumping out some Barbies and yall bitch about that.
Yall fricking pick- either bitch about us having all dudes or bitch about our attempts to attract future female cheerleaders.
No, no, no. The point is not to get anyone to pick anything. The point is "aggy gay."
Say it with me. AGGY GAY!!!
frick yeah. Own it. Imma buttfrick me some dude, got dammit.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:55 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Our dudes are sacred to us.
AGGY GAY!!!!
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:56 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
Wait, I think I just rustled my own jimmies.
High speed
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Your schools have cute little female cheerleaders. TAMU has male Yell Leaders. Deal with it.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:58 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Own it
Well sure I do, hence the 2013 comment.
I just hate seeing tRANT hypocrisy. This place is better than that.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 10:59 am to cardboardboxer
quote:
I just hate seeing tRANT hypocrisy. This place is better than that.
With all due respect, good sir, you lie
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:08 am to cardboardboxer
quote:You can't be serious.
I just hate seeing tRANT hypocrisy. This place is better than that.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:22 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
no thanks
Complementary jars for all visitors. You sure?
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:50 am to tigerbait1970
I dunno what everybody is bitching about. I love mine.
I talk to him all the time. He thinks you guys are meanies.
I talk to him all the time. He thinks you guys are meanies.
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:57 am to finestfirst79
They are sort of the Village People of College Football. I mean you have a milkman, a farmer, a soldier. I am sure there is one more character
Posted on 9/24/13 at 1:07 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
AggieHank86
The TAMU system does a much better job of organizing 80,000 fans into a synchronized wall of sound. Ask yourself which system is more likely to assist the guys wearing the pads and helmets in their efforts to win the game. That IS the goal, is it not?
LSU GrandDad
you're full of shite. any objective person merely has to look at top teams long term record and see that there's absolutely no truth in what you say. any statistian would easily find no correlation at all. BUT, you say it's true. you are making that up bud.
Sir, if you know anything at all about Statistics (which seems imminently unlikely), you will be familiar with the axiom that "correlation is not equal to causation."
The simple fact is that other schools have had better teams than TAMU for the vast majority of TAMU's history. (I was fortunate to attend during the Jackie Era, when such was not the case, as a general rule.)
Also as a general rule, the program with the better team (better coaches, better players, more money, better facilities, etcetera) will normally win the game.
For most of that history, we were not that team.
We were an all-male, military school with a very small student body and (consequently) a very small donor base. One would EXPECT other schools to have been able to out-spend us (and thus out-recruit us).
We are now the largest school in the state of Texas and the largest school in the SEC. Our endowment is now larger than the next three SEC schools COMBINED. Give us a few years for the perception to catch up with the reality, and we will be rolling in the types of recruits that our opponents have enjoyed for decades. We are almost at that point now, but those kids are still freshmen and sophomores, for the most part.
So, the question that I first addressed is not whether a weaker team with organized fans will always beat a superior team without organized fans. USUALLY, this will not happen.
The question is whether the SAME team will have a better chance of success with an organized fanbase or with a bunch of drunkards who are vaguely aware that a game is taking place a few dozen yards from where they are sitting.
I contend that the SAME team has a better chance of success if its fans are able to provide that small bit of auditory assistance, as opposed to being too intoxicated to be aware that their noise may be needed.
This post was edited on 9/24/13 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 9/24/13 at 2:13 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Are you and aggressor brothers?
Posted on 9/24/13 at 2:15 pm to GooseSix
quote:
In Berlin?
BOHHHHHHHHHH
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News