Started By
Message
re: Your ideal SEC?
Posted on 11/28/12 at 1:51 pm to loyalauron
Posted on 11/28/12 at 1:51 pm to loyalauron
I like the teams now in the SEC but to satisfy the "Rivals", I suggest the following:
SECWEST- LSU,A&M,AR,MS,OM,MO,UK
SECEAST- VU,GA,UA,AU,FL,SC,TN
Play a 8-4 schedule
I have my helmet on and chinstrap tightened, as I sure I am going to get bombarded by Bama fans, yelling about this; don't want to play bama, blah blah blah.There would be no permanent cross divisional game and each team would play cross divisional teams more often than now. Ducking now!! LOL
SECWEST- LSU,A&M,AR,MS,OM,MO,UK
SECEAST- VU,GA,UA,AU,FL,SC,TN
Play a 8-4 schedule
I have my helmet on and chinstrap tightened, as I sure I am going to get bombarded by Bama fans, yelling about this; don't want to play bama, blah blah blah.There would be no permanent cross divisional game and each team would play cross divisional teams more often than now. Ducking now!! LOL
This post was edited on 11/28/12 at 1:53 pm
0
Posted on 11/28/12 at 1:53 pm to cas4t
We both know you don't have family in Columbia and you've never been there. You're full of shite.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 1:54 pm to BreakawayZou83
quote:
You of course realize Arkansas is an expansion team too?
Of course.
But the first expansion allowed for divisions and a championship game.
The 12-team SEC was "manageable" and relatively compact.
14 teams just feels really forced and awkward to me. Maybe I will feel differently in 20 years.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:02 pm to BreakawayZou83
My twin cousins who went to high school in Kansas both attended Mizzou. I'm not really sure why I'm explaining myself right now TBH.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:14 pm to Tigah32
quote:
12 Team
West
Bama, AU, LSU, A&M, Arky, State, Ole Miss
East
Tennessee, UF, FSU, UK, UGA, FSU, North Carolina
I count 13 (unless you really meant to count FSU twice, then it's 14).
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:31 pm to loyalauron
WEST:
LSU
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
Alabama
Auburn
Vanderbilt
Kentucky
EAST:
Florida
Georgia
South Carolina
North Carolina
Virginia
Tennessee
Clemson
Get rid of Missouri, Arkansas, and Texas A&M. Add Virginia, North Carolina, and Clemson. They add better academics, sports, university towns, and money overall.
LSU
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
Alabama
Auburn
Vanderbilt
Kentucky
EAST:
Florida
Georgia
South Carolina
North Carolina
Virginia
Tennessee
Clemson
Get rid of Missouri, Arkansas, and Texas A&M. Add Virginia, North Carolina, and Clemson. They add better academics, sports, university towns, and money overall.
This post was edited on 11/28/12 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:36 pm to loyalauron
WEST:
ATM
Texas
Arky
Lsu
SOUTH:
Ole Miss
State
Bama
Auburn
NORTH:
Mizzou
Tenn
Kentucky
Vandy
EAST:
Georgia
Florida
USC
Clemson
ATM
Texas
Arky
Lsu
SOUTH:
Ole Miss
State
Bama
Auburn
NORTH:
Mizzou
Tenn
Kentucky
Vandy
EAST:
Georgia
Florida
USC
Clemson
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:44 pm to Rig
quote:
like it was before we pulled aTm
Cannot blame you.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:47 pm to Ole Colonel 27
quote:
NORTH:
Mizzou
Tenn
Kentucky
Vandy
EAST:
Georgia
Florida
USC
Clemson
Good god. No thanks.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:47 pm to cas4t
We have one of the largest Greek systems in the country, GDI is not the first explanation I would have of mizzou. Get fricked you Alabama tshirt fan (circa 2006)
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:55 pm to Ole Colonel 27
If we were starting over from scratch, I'd make it twelve teams divided into two divisions of six each. I would start with the Big Six:
Alabama
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Tenn
Then I'd let the following programs/schools give presentations on why they should get a spot at the table: Ole Miss, Miss State, Kentucky, Vandy, South Carolina, Arkansas, Clemson, FSU, Texas A&M, UNC, NC State, Duke, UVA, Va. Tech.
No more than two teams per state and all states must be contiguous.
Alabama
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
LSU
Tenn
Then I'd let the following programs/schools give presentations on why they should get a spot at the table: Ole Miss, Miss State, Kentucky, Vandy, South Carolina, Arkansas, Clemson, FSU, Texas A&M, UNC, NC State, Duke, UVA, Va. Tech.
No more than two teams per state and all states must be contiguous.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 2:55 pm to CNB
Yes the north would be weak and east very strong.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:01 pm to Ole Colonel 27
quote:
NORTH:
Mizzou
Tenn
Kentucky
Vandy
EAST:
Georgia
Florida
USC
Clemson
Jeez. I mean, I know balance isn't always perfect, but c'mon. This year, for example, the worst team in the east would have been significantly better than the best in the north
This post was edited on 11/28/12 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:02 pm to loyalauron
In the ideal world and focusing on revenue generation:
16 teams
Pickup UNC and Va Tech for the east
Put Mizzou in the West, where they geographically belong.
Play 9 conference games.
16 teams
Pickup UNC and Va Tech for the east
Put Mizzou in the West, where they geographically belong.
Play 9 conference games.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:12 pm to loyalauron
North: Mizzou, Arkansas, Iowa State, kansas State, Nebraska, Colorado
South: Texas A&M, Texas, Texas Tech, Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State
South: Texas A&M, Texas, Texas Tech, Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:14 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Texas, Texas Tech, Baylor
Let's replace them with Illinois, Tennesee and Kentucky. A&M can stay, I hate the other Tejas schools.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:17 pm to BreakawayZou83
quote:
Let's replace them with Illinois, Tennesee and Kentucky. A&M can stay, I hate the other Tejas schools.
Even better. And I'd replace Colorado with Iowa.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:37 pm to loyalauron
Drop Auburn, Miss State, and Vandy...add OU, UNC, and VTech.
14 teams, 14 states.
14 teams, 14 states.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:40 pm to KCM0Tiger
Let Kentucky and Mizzou stay, but as non-football members. 12 teams, easy scheduling
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:46 pm to Bose Ikard
quote:
14 teams, 14 states
I like that
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News