Started By
Message
Posted on 7/15/12 at 9:58 am to Elleshoe
Jim Harbaugh. he won at friggin Stanford. and he has a winning record against USC.
Posted on 7/15/12 at 11:13 am to Elleshoe
Bo Pellini
Jeff Tedford
Gus Malzahn
Boom
Jeff Tedford
Gus Malzahn
Boom
Posted on 7/15/12 at 11:18 am to Elleshoe
If Saban left today I would want Harbaugh.
Posted on 7/15/12 at 11:37 am to Elleshoe
Maybe Mark Dantonio from Michigan St. He graduated from Carolina and was a three year letter winner defensive back. He was also an assistant coach under Nick Saban before taking the head coaching job. He has a 62-39 record overall (44-22 at MSU) with 2 11 win seasons.
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:12 pm to Elleshoe
Gary Patterson. 80% win rate, familiar with recruiting territory, likes a fast D. He would be great I think.
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:14 pm to Elleshoe
It depends. I'm going to use recent personal experience to shape my answer. Different coaches have different roles. Mike Sherman for instance, was the best head coach at the time for A&M. He repaired what Fran destroyed, loved A&M to death, and restructured the program the way it needed to be. He was a better recruiter than I could have imagined, and was setting up A&M for extended success, even though he took an epic step back before he was fired. I also think he lacked what it took to hit the ground running, and make a splash exploiting the SEC move. That being said, he ran the best offensive system I have ever seen at the college level, really utilized a balanced approach talent wise, had an NFL pedigree, but definitely lacked swagger that attracted youth. Sumlin on the other have reeks of swagger, runs a stupid system, and is recruiting at a very high level, even though it is very opposed of what Sherman did. I know some people say you recruit the best player you can, and then change your system to suit them. That's stupid. You do that out of desperation. Great coaches perfect their system, then recruit and coach players to fit that system.
So. All that being said. Here is my criteria for judging coaches; system, recruiting star players, recruiting NFL players, player development, style, dependency on staff, and ability to win.
All of these are different for different areas. If I was hiring for a school like Ole Miss, I would really really really focus on the NFL angle. They can't go to a winning program overnight, but they should be signing four-six 4star linemen with the angle of pumping out NFL offensive and defensive linemen. A program without an identity other than rooting for the NY Giants because they had a quarterback or something lose games for them, but now he is winning... is tired. They aren't going to get a Heisman Trophy for the forseeable future, so they need to focus on a foundation of a football program that can be a platform for future success. You can do that the Mike Leach way as well. Find a system that catches people off guard, and perfect it. And don't get me wrong, it is hard to perfect. For a playbook that isn't any bigger than a single piece of paper, only QBs with years and years and years of experience could be successful with it. At some schools this is sort of irrelevant. But at A&M, I would like:
1. Lane Kiffin
2. Jim Harbaugh
3. Mike Leach
4. Bill Snyder
5. Bob Stoops
6. Tim DeRuyter
7. Gary Patterson
8. Kirby Smart
9. Chip Kelly
10. Urban Meyer
So. All that being said. Here is my criteria for judging coaches; system, recruiting star players, recruiting NFL players, player development, style, dependency on staff, and ability to win.
All of these are different for different areas. If I was hiring for a school like Ole Miss, I would really really really focus on the NFL angle. They can't go to a winning program overnight, but they should be signing four-six 4star linemen with the angle of pumping out NFL offensive and defensive linemen. A program without an identity other than rooting for the NY Giants because they had a quarterback or something lose games for them, but now he is winning... is tired. They aren't going to get a Heisman Trophy for the forseeable future, so they need to focus on a foundation of a football program that can be a platform for future success. You can do that the Mike Leach way as well. Find a system that catches people off guard, and perfect it. And don't get me wrong, it is hard to perfect. For a playbook that isn't any bigger than a single piece of paper, only QBs with years and years and years of experience could be successful with it. At some schools this is sort of irrelevant. But at A&M, I would like:
1. Lane Kiffin
2. Jim Harbaugh
3. Mike Leach
4. Bill Snyder
5. Bob Stoops
6. Tim DeRuyter
7. Gary Patterson
8. Kirby Smart
9. Chip Kelly
10. Urban Meyer
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:42 pm to Elleshoe
Hopefully this decision won't be needed till 2020 or so.
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:59 pm to Elleshoe
Gruden
More realistic: Strong
More realistic: Strong
This post was edited on 7/15/12 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 7/15/12 at 1:20 pm to Elleshoe
Chip Kelly with LSU talent = Dynasty
That's right.
That's right.
Posted on 7/15/12 at 6:04 pm to Elleshoe
I have to pass on this one since we just replaced ours with someone outside the SEC.
Posted on 7/15/12 at 7:20 pm to Elleshoe
I used to think I'd want Bielema from Wisconsin because he seemd to play a similar style of ball that Bama has appeciated for years, but he acted like a puss when Urban continued to recruit his commitments. So he's out!
The Michigan State coach would be a possibility...but he has heart problems and I'd hate for our fans to give him a coronary within a couple of weeks of the hire.
Kiffin would be fun 'cause he'd make the Vol fans go ballistic, but no. Don't like him.
Sarkisian at UW? Stoops?
Good question...I don't know.
The Michigan State coach would be a possibility...but he has heart problems and I'd hate for our fans to give him a coronary within a couple of weeks of the hire.
Kiffin would be fun 'cause he'd make the Vol fans go ballistic, but no. Don't like him.
Sarkisian at UW? Stoops?
Good question...I don't know.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News