Started By
Message

re: Who would you want to replace your HC in football?

Posted on 7/15/12 at 8:09 am to
Posted by AUtigR24
Happy Hour
Member since Apr 2011
19755 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 8:09 am to
Mike Tomlinson
Posted by Al Bundy Bulldog
The Grindfather
Member since Dec 2010
35831 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 9:57 am to
Urban Meyer
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 9:58 am to
Jim Harbaugh. he won at friggin Stanford. and he has a winning record against USC.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
156205 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 10:20 am to
sarkisian
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 10:27 am to
Sean Payton
Posted by AUTiger83
ATL
Member since Sep 2006
2188 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 11:13 am to
Bo Pellini
Jeff Tedford
Gus Malzahn
Boom
Posted by mwlewis
JeffCo
Member since Nov 2010
21237 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 11:18 am to
If Saban left today I would want Harbaugh.
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 11:37 am to
Maybe Mark Dantonio from Michigan St. He graduated from Carolina and was a three year letter winner defensive back. He was also an assistant coach under Nick Saban before taking the head coaching job. He has a 62-39 record overall (44-22 at MSU) with 2 11 win seasons.
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:12 pm to
Gary Patterson. 80% win rate, familiar with recruiting territory, likes a fast D. He would be great I think.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29194 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:14 pm to
It depends. I'm going to use recent personal experience to shape my answer. Different coaches have different roles. Mike Sherman for instance, was the best head coach at the time for A&M. He repaired what Fran destroyed, loved A&M to death, and restructured the program the way it needed to be. He was a better recruiter than I could have imagined, and was setting up A&M for extended success, even though he took an epic step back before he was fired. I also think he lacked what it took to hit the ground running, and make a splash exploiting the SEC move. That being said, he ran the best offensive system I have ever seen at the college level, really utilized a balanced approach talent wise, had an NFL pedigree, but definitely lacked swagger that attracted youth. Sumlin on the other have reeks of swagger, runs a stupid system, and is recruiting at a very high level, even though it is very opposed of what Sherman did. I know some people say you recruit the best player you can, and then change your system to suit them. That's stupid. You do that out of desperation. Great coaches perfect their system, then recruit and coach players to fit that system.

So. All that being said. Here is my criteria for judging coaches; system, recruiting star players, recruiting NFL players, player development, style, dependency on staff, and ability to win.

All of these are different for different areas. If I was hiring for a school like Ole Miss, I would really really really focus on the NFL angle. They can't go to a winning program overnight, but they should be signing four-six 4star linemen with the angle of pumping out NFL offensive and defensive linemen. A program without an identity other than rooting for the NY Giants because they had a quarterback or something lose games for them, but now he is winning... is tired. They aren't going to get a Heisman Trophy for the forseeable future, so they need to focus on a foundation of a football program that can be a platform for future success. You can do that the Mike Leach way as well. Find a system that catches people off guard, and perfect it. And don't get me wrong, it is hard to perfect. For a playbook that isn't any bigger than a single piece of paper, only QBs with years and years and years of experience could be successful with it. At some schools this is sort of irrelevant. But at A&M, I would like:


1. Lane Kiffin
2. Jim Harbaugh
3. Mike Leach
4. Bill Snyder
5. Bob Stoops
6. Tim DeRuyter
7. Gary Patterson
8. Kirby Smart
9. Chip Kelly
10. Urban Meyer
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:42 pm to
Hopefully this decision won't be needed till 2020 or so.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20841 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 12:59 pm to
Gruden


More realistic: Strong
This post was edited on 7/15/12 at 1:02 pm
Posted by TheBob
Metairie
Member since Jun 2005
16935 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 1:20 pm to
Chip Kelly with LSU talent = Dynasty

That's right.
Posted by blzr
MB
Member since Mar 2011
30114 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 2:28 pm to
Mark Dantonio
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81321 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 6:04 pm to
I have to pass on this one since we just replaced ours with someone outside the SEC.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66519 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 6:44 pm to
Urban Meyer
Posted by bamascott2
XIV
Member since Apr 2009
9671 posts
Posted on 7/15/12 at 7:20 pm to
I used to think I'd want Bielema from Wisconsin because he seemd to play a similar style of ball that Bama has appeciated for years, but he acted like a puss when Urban continued to recruit his commitments. So he's out!

The Michigan State coach would be a possibility...but he has heart problems and I'd hate for our fans to give him a coronary within a couple of weeks of the hire.

Kiffin would be fun 'cause he'd make the Vol fans go ballistic, but no. Don't like him.

Sarkisian at UW? Stoops?

Good question...I don't know.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter