Started By
Message

Richardson vs. Ingram.... Heisman
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:14 pm
Why do analysts keep comparing Ingram's Heisman year to Richardson's year? What does that have to do with Richardson's competition this year? Are they just trying to justify their bias? This is ruining the heisman... bunch of idiots that vote on this.
1. RGIII
2. Richardson
This seems pretty clear to IMO, but I guess we will have to see how much pull the REC has again
1. RGIII
2. Richardson
This seems pretty clear to IMO, but I guess we will have to see how much pull the REC has again
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:17 pm to Bow to Auburn
Did they ever compare cam to pat Sullivan?
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:18 pm to Bow to Auburn
quote:
I guess we will have to see how much pull the REC has again
you people are an embarrassment
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:18 pm to Bow to Auburn
The Heisman is, and has been for a while, a popularity contest.
It's really just about which great player does the media like the most.
Not saying RG3 isn't one of those great players, but it really is a bullshite award.
It's really just about which great player does the media like the most.
Not saying RG3 isn't one of those great players, but it really is a bullshite award.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:18 pm to szeringue
Yeah, like you don't see em comparing TM7 to Charles Woodson and shite.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:19 pm to Bow to Auburn
Idk it's weird. Trent isn't competing against Ingram. They might look at Ingram winning and think, "If Ingram can win then so can Trent." Because Trent is the baddest MFer in the land by far.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:20 pm to Bow to Auburn
quote:
Bow to Auburn
itat called....time for dinner
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:20 pm to Bow to Auburn
quote:
Why do analysts keep comparing Ingram's Heisman year to Richardson's year?
Because they both played/play for Alabama?
I seem to remember some mentions of Bo Jackson in stories about Cam Newton last year in reference to the Heisman.
Some of y'all look for bullshite just to have something to bitch about.

This post was edited on 12/10/11 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:23 pm to BamaChick
Ingram certainly wasnt the best player in the country the year he won it.
A much better argument could be made for TR.
A much better argument could be made for TR.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:23 pm to Teague
quote:
The Heisman is, and has been for a while, a popularity contest.
It's really just about which great player does the media like the most.
Not saying RG3 isn't one of those great players, but it really is a bull shite award.
Agree, but if RG3 wins it this year, I'd say he won it on the field. He hasn't had a well-oiled machine pushing him all year. Can't say I saw a lot of him, but what I saw was impressive.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 4:24 pm to BamaChick
It's becuase they try to say, "because TR's numbers are better than Ingram's, he should win." C'mon it should be vs the current competition ONLY.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 5:06 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Did they ever compare cam to pat Sullivan?
$180,000 vs $10,000
Posted on 12/10/11 at 5:11 pm to Bow to Auburn
I wouldn't have Richardson in my top five.
1. RGIII
2. Barkley
3. Ball
4. Luck
5. Weeden
Actually, I'd put Moore and Keenum ahead of Richardson this year too. He just never really was a large factor in Alabama's success.
1. RGIII
2. Barkley
3. Ball
4. Luck
5. Weeden
Actually, I'd put Moore and Keenum ahead of Richardson this year too. He just never really was a large factor in Alabama's success.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 5:13 pm to Bow to Auburn
Ingram and Troy Smith are two of the most mediocre Heisman winners in recent memory.
Posted on 12/10/11 at 5:14 pm to Me4Heisman
quote:
Ingram certainly wasnt the best player in the country the year he won it
Again with trying to downplay any accomplishment Alabama or its players have. Ingram deserved it. He has it. Get over it already
Posted on 12/10/11 at 5:15 pm to Bow to Auburn
I think TR had a harder road that Ingram because Ingram had TR & Julio and that took the focus off him.. TR gets all the attention and has still put
up great numbers.

up great numbers.

This post was edited on 12/10/11 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 12/10/11 at 5:15 pm to Bow to Auburn
quote:
but I guess we will have to see how much pull the REC has again
If you truly believe that, then you my friend are a delusional crazy douchebag
Posted on 12/10/11 at 5:16 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
Again with trying to downplay any accomplishment Alabama or its players have. Ingram deserved it. He has it. Get over it already
Yeah, he really locked it up in that Iron Bowl game.
Popular
Back to top
