The best debate question that I have heard in awhile

Which RB stable would you rather have?

Arkansas 2007 - McFadden, Jones and Hillis

Alabama 2009 - Ingram and Richardson

I remember this question being asked on here prior to the beginning of the CFB season this year; but now since Richardson has assumed the role of "The RB" in Bama's backfield, we all see just how good he truly is. So has your assessment changed since this past offseason?

My assessment:

With Arkansas, you have three future NFL standout RB's who have a little more speed than Bama did in 2009. You also have the advantage of having 3 of them, incase one or two of them are not performing to their full potential (ala Bama 2010).

With Alabama, you have one Heisman trophy winner (possibly two if Richardson pulls it off this year); a feat that no Arkansas RB in 2007 was able to accomplish. These two are also more of a ground and pound style of RB's.

I think in the end, I would have to go with Arkansas 2007 (probably because I still can't get the trio rushing for 7329857 yards in our 2007 triple OT loss, out of my mind.