Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:06 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
Where there is smoke
There is supper, when Bama is concerned.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:06 pm to NoNC4Tubs
I just want to know why no one bothered to check into this before. I took SBB a full week to check into these documents. You would think someone from the Birmingham News, the Montgomery Press-Register, or even a national outlet like Yahoo! Sports would have checked up on Winston's claims.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:11 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
I just want to know why no one bothered to check into this before. I took SBB a full week to check into these documents. You would think someone from the Birmingham News, the Montgomery Press-Register, or even a national outlet like Yahoo! Sports would have checked up on Winston's claims.
Because they know its a non-story. Even if Peaches did get money from whats his name, if there's a pre-existing relationship, it means nothing.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:14 pm to secfan123
quote:
Because they know its a non-story. Even if Peaches did get money from whats his name, if there's a pre-existing relationship, it means nothing.
Exactly. SportsbyBrooks even mentioned this in his article.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:18 pm to RollTide1987
Bet the Aubs don't post what ole Brooks is tweeting about now... 
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:20 pm to md9897
SportsbyBrooks tweets:
I'm glad he's finally admitting this after deleting several comments with this information below his article.
quote:
Since Bama compliance decided Peaches + Woodruff = Pre-Existing, mortgage, bank statements irrelevant
quote:
Bama compliance: Woodruff could buy Peaches a Carnival Cruise ship for Pensacola trips and NCAA cool with it.
I'm glad he's finally admitting this after deleting several comments with this information below his article.
This post was edited on 4/17/11 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:21 pm to RollTide1987
Aww darn, another thread by dirtydirty for nothing
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:22 pm to memphisplaya
IMPORTANT UPDATE!!!!!!
supper's done.
supper's done.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:23 pm to Alahunter
: those look delicious !!!!
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:24 pm to Alahunter
Hell yeah! Nice looking rack! Much better than my chicken pasta I'm working on. 
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:24 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Too bad he didn't stick with his AU commitment. That would have been the 20th investigation of Auburn for the year.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:27 pm to crimsonsaint
Brooks only became involved in this story after Alabama's day-long investigation turned up nothing. He thought it suspicious and wondered how Alabama could investigate such a matter so quickly. I wonder if the man ever stopped and asked if Alabama's compliance department hadn't already done their homework on the Woodruff-Winston-Calloway triangle?
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:28 pm to crimsonsaint
The key is will the NCAA agree that DW is not a booster. You never know how they will rule.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:30 pm to auburntiger77
quote:
The key is will the NCAA agree that DW is not a booster. You never know how they will rule.
No, actually its not. If Im a bama booster, and my best friend since we were 6 has a son who is a recruit, that does not preclude me from giving things to my best friend. See the Tee MArtin example I gave. A re-existing relationship trumps booster. Hence the "He could buy peaches a carnival cruise ship" line.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:30 pm to diddydirtyAubie
ddA - you've really got to be dumber than AlaHunter. Honestly, have you ever kissed a woman?
...unless she kissed you back it doesn't count. Plus she can't be related to you and buying a hooker doesn't count.
Seriously youre a bigger loser than morons than infest woolyal.com and ITAT.
...unless she kissed you back it doesn't count. Plus she can't be related to you and buying a hooker doesn't count.
Seriously youre a bigger loser than morons than infest woolyal.com and ITAT.
This post was edited on 4/17/11 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:31 pm to auburntiger77
quote:
The key is will the NCAA agree that DW is not a booster. You never know how they will rule.
That doesn't matter at all. There is a preexisting relationship between Peaches and Woodruff that goes back 20 years. Woodruff could give the guy cash payments for thousands of dollars every week and the NCAA could do nothing.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:35 pm to auburntiger77
quote:
The key is will the NCAA agree that DW is not a booster. You never know how they will rule.
You're going to have a hard time arguing that a guy who's never attended Alabama, given money, or bought season tickets is a booster. Good luck with that fiction.
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:36 pm to RollTide1987
I think ddA should change his thread title to "As the Barn Cries....Again."
Posted on 4/17/11 at 5:36 pm to auburntiger77
quote:
The key is will the NCAA agree that DW is not a booster. You never know how they will rule.
I thought J "Barney Fife" Lee already determined that he was not a UA booster?
Page 8 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News