Started By
Message
locked post

Is self reporting/penalizing of NCAA violations a bargaining or settlement ploy

Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:05 am
Posted by TheoreticalTiger
Big 10 Football sucks!!!
Member since Sep 2010
2698 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:05 am
used by schools to not get the hammer? IMO it should not affect penalties dished out by NCAA. (and yes LSU has done this)
Posted by AlanRainman
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
2662 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:09 am to
As long as AU goes down in flames. I know what I just said has nothing to do with your thread.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
22953 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:10 am to
That's the pretty much the way it works. However, in this case, much like Pearl's, they governing body was lied to. That means the NCAA may still bring down the hammer. Few things are more dishonorable than being caught lying under the honor system.

Posted by ALcapone
Member since Nov 2010
3828 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:10 am to
the idea is to encourage teams to be forthcoming. without the incentive of lesser penalties, all teams would be out to cover their arse as best as possible. compliance departments would be replaced by 'hide our shite' departments
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
69692 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:17 am to
I plead guilty to murder, and i served 10 years instead of life.
Posted by LaBornNRaised
Loomis blows
Member since Feb 2011
11009 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:18 am to
BARGAINING...
This post was edited on 3/9/11 at 12:20 am
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:18 am to
Well, yes and no. It is a violation not to self report once you know, so you technically have to do it anyways. However, the fact that you did discover the violations on your own and didn't just report them because Yahoo aired your laundry gives you some favor with the NCAA.
Posted by TheoreticalTiger
Big 10 Football sucks!!!
Member since Sep 2010
2698 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:26 am to
quote:

the idea is to encourage teams to be forthcoming. without the incentive of lesser penalties, all teams would be out to cover their arse as best as possible. compliance departments would be replaced by 'hide our shite' departments


This reminds me of the war of drugs fails. Send an obvious smaller bust to Tijuana to throw authorities off and run 5 tons of yayo right up the middle of the gulf undiscovered.
Posted by MSUmtowndawg
Jackson, MS
Member since Sep 2010
1482 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 12:35 am to
I feel that self-penalizing is just a bargaining chip with the NCAA. like "hey, we already busted his arse out, so don’t bust ours out as bad... please" to which the NCAA responds, "we will do whatever we feel like, just cause we took it easy on college A, doesn’t mean shite for college B, but nice of you to try"

The NCAA makes it up as they go. I really feel like they could catch people and resolve it quickly. But if they kept the OSU players out of the Sugar Bowl, they know revenue would be lost. So they drag their feet until after the financial liability passes.

Who cares if Pryor misses some games against the School for the Blind and Deaf. But missing the Sugar Bowl would have lost the NCAA and their big whigs money.

Might be off base but feel free to correct me if my view is mis-informed
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20953 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 1:07 am to
quote:

used by schools to not get the hammer? IMO it should not affect penalties dished out by NCAA. (and yes LSU has done this)

It should if they reported it as soon as they knew about it and took the proper action. For example, IIRC, Oklahoma had a situation where two of their players admitted to taking money and Stoops immediately dismissed them. If a school stays on top of things and handles things properly, they should be hit less severely. If they're just reporting it right before the NCAA begins their investigation, then I would agree the penalties shouldn't be affected.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20953 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 1:08 am to
quote:

the idea is to encourage teams to be forthcoming. without the incentive of lesser penalties, all teams would be out to cover their arse as best as possible. compliance departments would be replaced by 'hide our shite' departments


I was about to say this. If the NCAA were to start killing teams that did everything right, they'll have to do everything on their own after that.
Posted by 1984Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Apr 2006
7581 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 6:34 am to
quote:

all teams would be out to cover their arse as best as possible. compliance departments would be replaced by 'hide our shite' departments

So you're saying Auburn is one step ahead of everyone else?
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
66469 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 6:53 am to
quote:

used by schools to not get the hammer? IMO it should not affect penalties dished out by NCAA. (and yes LSU has done this)


Its a cop out.
Posted by CaseyMc2
Louisiana Native
Member since Feb 2009
4092 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 6:55 am to
quote:

Well, yes and no. It is a violation not to self report once you know, so you technically have to do it anyways. However, the fact that you did discover the violations on your own and didn't just report them because Yahoo aired your laundry gives you some favor with the NCAA.


I have one problem here, that be they flat out lied and the Coach at that nonetheless who on National TV scolded his players for the very same reason as he, lying. He also made them stand by their commitment in playing another year and foregoing their chance at the NFL draft. Whatever happened to the word "INTEGRITY"? That is the one word every institution, The Heisman, the NCAA, the Conferences and the Schools "SUPPOSEDLY" lives by every day but yet everyone acts like it doesn't or never exsisted in the English Language.
From The NCAA's own words in their Core Values statement:
quote:

Core Values
The Association – through its member institutions, conferences and national office staff – shares a belief in and commitment to:

• The collegiate model of athletics in which students participate as an avocation, balancing their academic, social and athletics experiences.

The highest levels of integrity and sportsmanship.

The pursuit of excellence in both academics and athletics.

The supporting role that intercollegiate athletics plays in the higher education mission and in enhancing the sense of community and strengthening the identity of member institutions.

An inclusive culture that fosters equitable participation for student-athletes and career opportunities for coaches and administrators from diverse backgrounds.

Respect for institutional autonomy and philosophical differences.

Presidential leadership of intercollegiate athletics at the campus, conference and national levels.
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2010


Somewhere along the lines we have got to get back to where everyone plays, Coached, adhere, and lives by the same equitable rules and guides and on the same playing field because, if we do not it will not be long until there will no longer be College Athletics and the Amature Athlete.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
88629 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 6:57 am to
In theory it's used to help lessen the school's actual penalty from the NCAA, but I feel like in UGA's case it's never done a lick of good. Recent examples include sitting AJ Green on good faith even though nobody told us we had to, and then the NCAA gave him 4 games anyway...for selling his own property.

The biggest one that comes to mind is our 2003 basketball team that was fricking GOOD. Like maybe the best basketball team we've ever had. But due to the Harrick mess we pulled ourselves out of the NCAA tournament that year. The NCAA didn't give a shite though and still took us to the bone zone. That was so, so frustrating for a fan of typically horrific UGA basketball, knowing that we had a legit final 4 caliber team and they didn't even get a chance. I remember the players showed up in Adams' front yard the night they found out.
This post was edited on 3/9/11 at 7:08 am
Posted by mgmbamafan
Member since Jan 2011
572 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 7:56 am to
the next one to watch is LSU's self report and self imposed penalties. Will the NCAA accept those? Will LSU get probation? Not sure when this will be ruled on by the NCAA?

LSU is awaiting the NCAA enforcement staff's completion of its review of the reports and anticipates receiving a notice of allegations from the NCAA, outlining the violations the NCAA believes have occurred.



December 16,2010: Baton Rouge - LSU has docked itself two scholarships in the upcoming recruiting class and two scholarships overall for the 2011-12 school year as part of the self-imposed restrictions for recruiting violations uncovered in 2009, the school said Thursday.

LINK

"LSU took quick and thorough action when we discovered these violations and we are hopeful the NCAA will ultimately agree with our assessment of this case," said LSU Chancellor Michael Martin. "The reports to the NCAA and SEC and our decision to self-impose penalties are the culmination of many months of arduous work by our compliance office and I am confident their thorough examination of this case has produced appropriate sanctions for the football program."

Our compliance office discovered additional violations during the course of this investigation and took immediate corrective measures to ensure they would not occur again, which is what a good compliance office is supposed to do," said Joe Alleva, Vice Chancellor and Director of Athletics. "I am disappointed that these violations took place, but I am proud of the way that LSU reacted to the situation. We now stand ready to assist the NCAA in the completion of this process."

Posted by austingator
austin
Member since Jan 2009
7442 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 8:04 am to
Tressell is dirty, and the chickens have come home.

The self penalties OSU imposed are a JOKE. Tressell isn't as stupid as not knowing there were major violations that would make those players inelegible to play. His excuses in the press conference yesterday literally made me laugh.

Vacated season for starters. Failure to encourage NCAA compliance, and loss of scholarships hopefully will be forthcoming. Slive gave harsher penalties to Pearl (more money, and he cannot recruit on the road). 250 grand for Tressel is a few dollars to us. Chump change.

Posted by mgmbamafan
Member since Jan 2011
572 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Vacated season for starters


I wish the NCAA had not started using this.... What happens on the field is what counts. Alabama having to Vacate almost three seasons for textbooks was a joke. Scholarship limits are better and actually hurt the team.. Take 30 scholarships from OSU and see what happens.
Posted by HerbEaverstinks
Member since Jan 2011
4489 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 8:24 am to
Gotta be a hammer about to hit the face thing, because we all know of a school where it's always been this way:

"The deny until you die mantra is alive and well, no?"
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9459 posts
Posted on 3/9/11 at 8:32 am to
quote:

I wish the NCAA had not started using this.... What happens on the field is what counts. Alabama having to Vacate almost three seasons for textbooks was a joke. Scholarship limits are better and actually hurt the team.. Take 30 scholarships from OSU and see what happens.


The fact that Alabama's penalty was that harsh is what was the joke. They literally were a textbook example (no pun intended) of how to police yourself. Tressel withheld information and yet they won't get hit anywhere near as hard as Alabama was. Watch and see. The NCAA simply won't hammer a major Big Ten program because is doesn't want to.
This post was edited on 3/9/11 at 8:33 am
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter