Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

WHY A PLAYOFF SYSTEM WILL NOT WORK

Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:01 pm
Posted by TIGER62
METAIRIE, LA
Member since Aug 2005
2219 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:01 pm
8 teams - one of them is uconn- whoever they play has it's qb hurt early in the game - playing the game in the orange bowl - uconn upsets the team & wins - has to go to the west coast - same thing happens - they win again - go to the championship game in arizona - and all this time their fan base is not buying tickets - like is happening now - millioms of dollars of tickets not purchased - who eats that
Posted by fontell
Montgomery
Member since Sep 2006
4557 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:04 pm to
Why a thread won't work....see above
Posted by hogfaninlafayette
Member since Dec 2010
215 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:05 pm to
using bowls for playoffs won't work. you can't have neutral sites in playoffs....there has to be a home team
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:08 pm to
Posted by BDTS
Nashville
Member since Dec 2010
12 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:08 pm to
So you think the BCS, who matched up Alabama and Texas last year, is better? I think I remember a quarterback going down early in that game.
This post was edited on 12/22/10 at 7:11 pm
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86993 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:09 pm to
AMERICA ......frick YEAH!!!!!!!
Posted by DiafGtfo
Member since Nov 2010
1894 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by ndtiger
vicksburg, ms
Member since Aug 2004
8714 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

all this time their fan base is not buying tickets - like is happening now


so it is already happening so how can it be worse?
Posted by npt817
Prairieville, LA
Member since Sep 2010
1662 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:42 pm to
Why is one of them UCONN? If you are going to set up a playoff of any sort, you dont have the automatic bids that got UCONN in a BCS game to begin with. You take the top 8 ranked teams (or whatever number is determined to play) and they play it out to determine a true Champion. Rankings determine seedings.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70129 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:43 pm to
well if it was a playoff i might watch and care about the uconn game.
Posted by jjbodean1970
Huntington, WV
Member since Mar 2006
6493 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

millioms of dollars of tickets not purchased - who eats that
uconn is eating it this year.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 7:55 pm to
FCS playoffs work just fine.

I can't understand why anyone believes the BCS schools couldn't make playoffs work when smaller schools have no trouble crowning a champion without any controversy whatsoever.

Posted by GAMErebelCOCK
Oxford, MS
Member since Sep 2010
560 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 8:12 pm to
my question is how affordable is the playoff system for the fanbase. SEC CG tix were, at the least, $85. How much would each playoff game be?
Posted by tossedoff
LP
Member since May 2009
1662 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 8:21 pm to
FCS playoffs work in stadia that seat maybe 30,000 and aren't filled, even for the championship games. Travel and cost for playoff games would be an issue for fans. Remember, many college campuses are not where their largest fan bases are located.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 9:09 pm to
And yet FCS playoffs still makes money. Does anyone believe that BCS schools wouldn't travel well, or fill their own stadiums?

Remember, in FCS-style playoffs, the lower-seeded team travels to play in the stadium of the higher-seeded team. Except for the championship game.

LSU would have no problem selling out Tiger Stadium for a playoff game against Ohio State. Or travelling well to Columbus if the Buckeyes were the higher seed.
This post was edited on 12/22/10 at 9:10 pm
Posted by GAMErebelCOCK
Oxford, MS
Member since Sep 2010
560 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 9:12 pm to
so LSU would have no problem traveling to Ohio one week and then Oregon the next?
Posted by hogfaninlafayette
Member since Dec 2010
215 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 9:18 pm to
it wouln't matter because tosu and oregon would sell out anyway...thast's why i said you would have to do away with bowl games and go with home games
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

so LSU would have no problem traveling to Ohio one week and then Oregon the next?


From what standpoint? Fans, or level of competition?

We play in the SEC West, the toughest division in CFB. We're used to playing tough teams in consecutive weeks. And Tiger fans don't just travel, they take over.

Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

FCS playoffs work just fine.

I can't understand why anyone believes the BCS schools couldn't make playoffs work when smaller schools have no trouble crowning a champion without any controversy whatsoever.


I'll give you my quick assraping of this "FCS can do it argument:.

1. Smaller fanbases to move. It's a helluva lot easier to get under 10,000 fans to buy $20 tickets than to get 75,000 plus fans to buy $50 and above tickets.

2. Their number one seed had 2 losses. The frick? BTW, before you bring up LSU, LSU wasn't number 1 in the BCS AND they won their conference.

3. They have never had a bowl system anyways.

4. I like potato chips.

5. The top 24 (I believe that's the number of playoff teams they have) don't always make the playoffs.

6. Profit.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 12/22/10 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

I'll give you my quick assraping of this "FCS can do it argument:.

1. Smaller fanbases to move. It's a helluva lot easier to get under 10,000 fans to buy $20 tickets than to get 75,000 plus fans to buy $50 and above tickets.

2. Their number one seed had 2 losses. The frick? BTW, before you bring up LSU, LSU wasn't number 1 in the BCS AND they won their conference.

3. They have never had a bowl system anyways.

4. I like potato chips.

5. The top 24 (I believe that's the number of playoff teams they have) don't always make the playoffs.

6. Profit.


I'll leave you to the assraping. I'll just refute your arguments like this:

quote:

1. Smaller fanbases to move. It's a helluva lot easier to get under 10,000 fans to buy $20 tickets than to get 75,000 plus fans to buy $50 and above tickets.


How is this different from weekly play in the SEC? When the 11th then 12th games were added, most schools like LSU had no problem selling the additional games. Playoff games wouldn't be any different.

quote:

2. Their number one seed had 2 losses. The frick? BTW, before you bring up LSU, LSU wasn't number 1 in the BCS AND they won their conference.


How is this different from the BCS again? And what does it matter if it is? Settling things on the field would make controversies irrelevant.

quote:

3. They have never had a bowl system anyways.


The bowl system reached it's sell-by date long ago.

quote:

4. I like potato chips.


Me, too. Zap's FTW.



quote:

5. The top 24 (I believe that's the number of playoff teams they have) don't always make the playoffs.


Would be even less of a problem with the BCS schools.

quote:

6. Profit.


More to be made from playoffs, and especially by smaller schools, than was ever true with the bowls. Most bowl teams lose money on the deal.





This post was edited on 12/22/10 at 11:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter