Started By
Message
re: According to ESPN, Alabama
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:00 am to DvlsAdvocat
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:00 am to DvlsAdvocat
quote:
Any LSU fans ready to admit they have the shittiest NC in the crystal football era?
Why do LSU fans have to say that when anyone other than Ohio Suck would have won the NC with two losses? UGA had 2 losses, USC had 2 losses..
This is getting rediculous ..No side is going to give in, it's fun for argument sake but I think most reasonable fans recognize Bama as having great history.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:01 am to Geauxtigers468
quote:
most reasonable fans recognize Bama as having great history.
8 national championships IS a great history.
Congrats bama
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:01 am to RelientAA
quote:LINK or GTFO.
Guess you cant read very well or did you skip the part where I said dont try the start date bullshite.
Ever posted on more than one name dipshit?
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:02 am to DvlsAdvocat
quote:
What you don't want to accept or can't seem to grasp is what happened before those "major polls" EXISTED.
By that logic, Auburn can claim another 2 championships in the 1910s
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:03 am to NOLATide
quote:
LINK or GTFO
Yeah let me go ahead and do that for ya
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:10 am to grfsg
quote:
By that logic, Auburn can claim another 2 championships in the 1910s
Got that right.
Today forward I'm claiming 64, 65 and 77 for Arkansas.
Got 3 tees will sell like hotcakes.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:11 am to NOLATide
Why would you talk about yourself like that?
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:15 am to RelientAA
quote:Oh - Good one! Sorry to tell you pal, you claim to have been on this board since Christ was a kid, but you are really only a shite-talking newb.
Why would you talk about yourself like that?
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:17 am to NOLATide
quote:
you claim to have been on this board since Christ was a kid
I dont think the internet was invented then
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:18 am to TenTex
quote:
Is any Bama Fan ready to admit they have only won 8?
Ok you are going with the 8 championships that ESPN recognizes. Which is all of our championships since 1961. So that = 8
Why should the three undefeated untied rose bowl champions prior to 1950 not be national champions? That would make 11. Then you would be down to a team that went undefeated and tied the rose bowl and the 1941 team to equal 13.
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:20 am to CrimsonTusk
quote:
1941 team
stop trying to claim this shite
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:23 am to TenTex
quote:
We don't care about Bama. We do care when any school lies about it's accomplishments.
I have maintained 8 but why do you care if a Univ not affiliated with LSu lies about their NC or accepts NC awarded by different publications. It does not hurt LSu nor are yall even in consideration for having the most NC so why should this matter to any other school besides ND or USC or any other school that is close to having the most?
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:25 am to NOLATide
quote:
quote:
Why would you talk about yourself like that?
Oh - Good one! Sorry to tell you pal, you claim to have been on this board since Christ was a kid, but you are really only a shite-talking newb.
What is the relevance of how long someone has posted or how many posts they have?
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:26 am to s-port tiger
quote:
What is the relevance of how long someone has posted or how many posts they have?
IDK but the dude called me a newb
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:28 am to grfsg
quote:
Does this mean Auburn gets the 2004 National Championship?
in a way i want to say yes if using the same measuring stick as some of ours were... BUT, at the time when we claim ours there was no "BCS" trophy or any specific way to deem ONE team as the absolute champion. so, since auburn has to play by the rules of the TIME they were in when they went undefeated, then no.
besides, didn't they only beat 3 teams with winning records?
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:29 am to SprintFun
I can't believe anyone really gives a frick about this.
Bama has more than NCs any team not named Notre Dame - and some of theirs are questionable.
Bama's tradition is second to none, and is considerably better than LSUs.
The end
Bama has more than NCs any team not named Notre Dame - and some of theirs are questionable.
Bama's tradition is second to none, and is considerably better than LSUs.
The end
This post was edited on 1/14/10 at 10:31 am
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:30 am to RelientAA
I recently did a calculation for AU using the bammer logic of 3rd in the SEC and at least a number 20 ranking in the AP poll = NC.
It was determined on the thread AU has somewhere around 30 National Championships.
Also AU has 13 undefeated SEC seasons, more than any other team in the SEC.
Maybe AU has about 40 NC's?
It was determined on the thread AU has somewhere around 30 National Championships.
Also AU has 13 undefeated SEC seasons, more than any other team in the SEC.
Maybe AU has about 40 NC's?
This post was edited on 1/14/10 at 10:32 am
Posted on 1/14/10 at 10:31 am to CrimsonTusk
quote:
Ok you are going with the 8 championships that ESPN recognizes. Which is all of our championships since 1961. So that = 8
Why should the three undefeated untied rose bowl champions prior to 1950 not be national champions? That would make 11. Then you would be down to a team that went undefeated and tied the rose bowl and the 1941 team to equal 13.
So I guess Yale has 18 and Princeton has 14. https://www.nationalchamps.net/NCAA/nationalchamps_history.htm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News