Started By
Message

Recruiting

Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:09 am
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
24655 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:09 am
I'm really hoping we can get some good recruiters on staff now. Lane was a shitty recruiter if we are honest.

Yeah, we relied on the portal but should have had better HS recruiting. That never happened under him. We don't even know who is going to leave via portal yet until our playoff run is over.
Posted by TMRebel
Oxford, MS
Member since Feb 2013
7222 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:13 am to
I actually prefer Lane’s recruiting method. I see no purpose in high school recruiting unless someone is just a stud that can make immediate impact. I realize it’s harder to instill culture this way, but these kids are mercenaries. It’s just a reality of modern football.

I do hope our new staff is more active on that recruiting front though. Lane seemed to be a photo op guy, not totally in.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
75655 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:23 am to
I’m with you. Lane’s method led to our best seasons in 60 years. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
24655 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:33 am to
I must be retarded because people misunderstand just about everything I type.

I think Lane's method was good and I'm not saying that should change but our HS recruiting should be better. Some kids really do just stick with a program. Not every kid is a mercenary, just some of them. Most kids still stick with the school they sign with out of HS. That's a statistical fact.
Posted by Dixie.Reb
Oxford
Member since Jul 2013
3200 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:38 am to
I think O Line and D Line are key to identify out of HS. Probably add DB’s to that list too. Very few quality linemen in the transfer portal. Especially if we keep a similar offense, skill positions are more plug and play although you still need good talent eval.
Posted by WhiskeyDick
shite Poster
Member since Sep 2014
1500 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 11:56 am to
I asked Grok earlier about NFL talent per capita and Mississippi currently ranks #3 with active NFL players and going back to the leagues inception we’re ranked #1 by a decent margin. Yes the portal has proven to work and it’s hard to keep kids at one place more than a year, but I’d really like to try and lock down the in-state talent for a number of reasons.
Posted by ManBearSharkReb
Member since Dec 2018
5359 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 12:18 pm to
Our best players on defense are HS recruits. Perkins, Xav, Echoles, Franklin.

It would be nice to get 15 bluechip recruits every year. That gives you a core of 60 guys and then fill in the gaps with instant impact portal guys like Dart, Harris, Nolen, Amos, Lacy, Chambliss etc.
Posted by Drive4show
Member since Aug 2009
446 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

I asked Grok earlier about NFL talent per capita and Mississippi currently ranks #3 with active NFL players and going back to the leagues inception we’re ranked #1 by a decent margin. Yes the portal has proven to work and it’s hard to keep kids at one place more than a year, but I’d really like to try and lock down the in-state talent for a number of reasons


Now ask Grok how we rank with NFL talent per in-state SEC school (i.e. MS NFL Players per # of MS SEC Teams).

Per capita doesn't help much when we have the lowest population in the SEC and multiple SEC programs.
Posted by WhiskeyDick
shite Poster
Member since Sep 2014
1500 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 12:46 pm to
I’m not sure how that’s relevant to the statement that we A) have a lot of talent in-state and B) should try to lock them down vs just going full portal. We’re not debating that it’s harder to hold them vs a place like Louisiana, just that they are here and we should make a strong effort to get them.
Posted by Fireman17
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
12019 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 12:52 pm to
Really hope make a run at getting Frank Wilson on the staff in some way.. He could help us lock down NO area and screw lane out a lot great recruits.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53362 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 1:55 pm to
In some ways, me too, but I also don’t want a staff full of old-heads if that makes sense.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
24655 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 2:00 pm to
quote:


Really hope make a run at getting Frank Wilson on the staff in some way.. He could help us lock down NO area and screw lane out a lot great recruits.


I would rather throw the bank at Smith and keep Lacy and bring in Frank for another on field position, TE maybe.
Posted by Saskwatch
Member since Feb 2016
17978 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

getting Frank Wilson on the staff in some way.. He could help us lock down NO area and screw lane out a lot great recruits.


A lot of our best players under O we got this way. Lane will put more work into recruiting elsewhere and not the facetime with the HS coaches there which still mean alot.

I dont know why LK wouldnt put Frank W. And O on staff immediately.
Posted by Fireman17
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
12019 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 2:02 pm to
Totally agree keeping Smith is a must thing too do.. Think he is the best RB coach in the country. One reason lane is trying take him too
Posted by RebelVol
The Sip
Member since Aug 2016
4696 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

I dont know why LK wouldnt put Frank W. And O on staff immediately.
I know they coached together at USC & UT but do you think there’s a tiny voice in the back of Lanes mind saying “he’s already had the LSU head job before, he became interim when I was fired from USC, maybe some boosters want that to happen here and him be LSU HC again” and he’s trying to avoid that possibility?
Posted by TMRebel
Oxford, MS
Member since Feb 2013
7222 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 3:02 pm to
I do think it would be odd to have him on your staff after he’s already been head man at LSU and won a natty there so recently. Has there ever been a similar situation within coaching before?
Posted by Fireman17
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
12019 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 3:05 pm to
One reason i think Lane wants no way close to LSU program.. Cause he already got interim coach tag once.. Notice most of all Lane assist coaches that was on staff at Ole Miss never was HC or interim any where. Note i could be wrong that but seems like a pattern with Lane.. He don't want anyone has been HC any where close to his staff after the whole USC/Bama firing.
Posted by rebsfan10
Member since Dec 2013
2069 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 4:24 pm to
quote:


Totally agree keeping Smith is a must thing too do.. Think he is the best RB coach in the country. One reason lane is trying take him too


I want to keep Smith, but I'll refer you to the 2024 Ole Miss Rebels rushing stats regarding that statement.
Posted by Fireman17
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
12019 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 4:39 pm to
I was wrong in that statement but.. give him a good RB like Lacy and he can do things.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter