Started By
Message
Pretty sure this is what I saw tonight on ESPN's CFP rankings show....
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:24 pm
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:24 pm
11
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:25 pm to koreandawg
I get your point and you're not wrong. But, I'll happily take it for now 
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:25 pm to koreandawg
Explain this one:
OU fought tooth and nails against LSU. Squeaked out a win. Didn’t move up.
Alabama fought tooth and nails against Auburn. Squeaked out a win. Moved up.
OU fought tooth and nails against LSU. Squeaked out a win. Didn’t move up.
Alabama fought tooth and nails against Auburn. Squeaked out a win. Moved up.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:27 pm to Boomer65
Explanation: Alabama is not gonna be out if they lose the SEC championship. Needed to move them up, and take their lumps this week vs. having them jump Notre Dame next week after a loss in case BYU wins.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:29 pm to Boomer65
Bama didn't move up because we won. We moved up because Texas A&M lost and made NDs schedule look suspect.
Also if Bama losea Bama has to get in or the SEC title game goes away forever
Also if Bama losea Bama has to get in or the SEC title game goes away forever
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:31 pm to koreandawg
Alabama finished number 1 in the SEC. You think they should be left out? I get that we have traumatized you guys, but you ought to want the SEC to get preferential treatment.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:33 pm to Boomer65
quote:
Alabama fought tooth and nails against Auburn. Squeaked out a win
Not entirely accurate.
Auburn looked dead for most of the first half.
In the second half, we got the actual Iron Bowl and then Auburn ran out of magic after DeBoer nutted up big time on multiple fourth downs that even had Les Miles blushing.
It’s the Iron Bowl. Also, frick Notre Dame.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:34 pm to koreandawg
The only thing for certain to me is that the committee just makes up shite as they go along. When the Chair is saying they liked the playcalling of Bama against Auburn as the reason they moved them up they have completely thrown out any objective standards. It's just how they feel and they are loaded with people that have conflicts of interest and grudges.
It's a joke, always has been.
It's a joke, always has been.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:35 pm to koreandawg
You'd think Georgia didn't struggle against a worse Auburn team earlier in the season the way OP is talking.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:35 pm to Boomer65
quote:
Explain this one:
OU fought tooth and nails against LSU. Squeaked out a win. Didn’t move up.
Alabama fought tooth and nails against Auburn. Squeaked out a win. Moved up.
Alabama beat Auburn on the road in a rivalry game? It's paper thin but I can see it if I squint hard enough.
Dude, we are in the playoffs while the T-Sippers will be watching on the TV. Enjoy it.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:36 pm to crimsoncoded94
That would make sense except ......THEY NEVER, EVER DO THAT!!!
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:38 pm to Boomer65
Committee does this all the time. They’re just setting up the rankings for specific outcomes with the least amount of backlash.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:38 pm to Marktastic86
quote:
You'd think Georgia didn't struggle against a worse Auburn team earlier in the season the way OP is talking.
We lost one game, bruh. We didn't lose to an unranked team, bruh.
This isn't about Bammer, bruh. Just that even if you disagree with the CFP ranking of Notre Dame above Bama, bruh, the reason given for reversing that ranking isn't sound, bruh.
Clue: You can believe that Bama should be above Notre Dame but still criticize the explanation given for doing it.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:39 pm to koreandawg
If Bama beats UGA twice in a year should we be ahead of them?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:40 pm to koreandawg
Impressive melt thread.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:42 pm to koreandawg
Yeah. That statement was the most absurd and insincere statement made all night by anyone. It’s like saying we’ve made up our mind and have to find any excuse to justify it.
Just say you feel Bama is better and deal with the feedback. That statement made them look manipulative.
Just say you feel Bama is better and deal with the feedback. That statement made them look manipulative.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:44 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
Committee does this all the time.
This is only the second year of the 12 team playoff. They make dumb decisions based on name brands. The sport will never again be allowed to have any type of rhythm or flow to it because of idiots. Get the simulators out and use the computers. But then that takes away air time for these mouth breathing morons on the world wide loser
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:46 pm to koreandawg
One thing the committee should absolutely do is re-evaluate every week. They are making debatable judgement calls. Just because they make a choice one week shouldn’t mean they are locked into that forever. Sure, this opens them up to criticism for inconsistency, but getting it right is more important than avoiding criticism.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:46 pm to crimsoncoded94
quote:
If Bama beats UGA twice in a year should we be ahead of them?
I would put you there, but there would be an argument for you not to be.
The fault in all of this lies in teams only wanting to show off their best assets and hide their warts.
Notre Dame
Miami
Alabama
Oklahoma
Texas
Vandy
and whoever else
The reason you are where you are is your own fault. WIN YOUR GAMES!!!
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:47 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Impressive melt thread.
Bama broke his ritard arse a long time ago.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News