Started By
Message
Each drive for Auburn against A&M
Posted on 9/29/25 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 9/29/25 at 8:46 pm
1. 3 plays 6 yards
2. 3 plays 8 yards
3. 5 for 16
4. 3 for -1
5. 9 for 57 (FG)
6. 4 for -6
7. 4 for 7
8. 8 for 33
9. 11 for 33
10. 1 for 2
11. 3 for -4
12. 3 for 0
13. 4 for 3
2. 3 plays 8 yards
3. 5 for 16
4. 3 for -1
5. 9 for 57 (FG)
6. 4 for -6
7. 4 for 7
8. 8 for 33
9. 11 for 33
10. 1 for 2
11. 3 for -4
12. 3 for 0
13. 4 for 3
8
Posted on 9/29/25 at 8:48 pm to Hugh McElroy
You hate to see it 
Posted on 9/29/25 at 8:57 pm to Hugh McElroy
The run back of the fluke INT accounted for 40% of Auburn's total yardage.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 9:17 pm to Hugh McElroy
It’s pretty fricking difficult to have 11 plays going for 33 yards.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 9:25 pm to Hugh McElroy
You obviously beat a below average team with little or no ability.
What is your point here? The story to me is that A&M did not win 52-0.
You better figure it out before you face real SEC competition. Everyone knows Auburn is the bottom of the SEC.
What is your point here? The story to me is that A&M did not win 52-0.
You better figure it out before you face real SEC competition. Everyone knows Auburn is the bottom of the SEC.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 9:26 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:Wow. Y’all suck
5. 9 for 57 (FG)
Posted on 9/29/25 at 9:43 pm to windsor1977
Sounds like you are scared. No need to project.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 9:55 pm to Jobu93
quote:
It’s pretty fricking difficult to have 11 plays going for 33 yards.
That's almost LSU level bad.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 10:00 pm to theballguy
No on e will believe me because its tRant, but I meant no shade by the comment.
The combination of advancing with yards gained and then the penalties and possible sacks over 11 plays. That is really hard to do. It’s very improbable.
The combination of advancing with yards gained and then the penalties and possible sacks over 11 plays. That is really hard to do. It’s very improbable.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 10:02 pm to Jobu93
quote:
The combination of advancing with yards gained and then the penalties and possible sacks over 11 plays. That is really hard to do. It’s very improbable.
Trust me, they'll look all-world come Iron Bowl time. They save it all for that game. I'm not surprised they could look this bad and save it for later for their Super Bowl.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 9:15 am to Hugh McElroy
We need to worry about our own problems. 414 yards of offense and only a single touchdown. That’s a disaster, we very narrowly avoided.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 9:38 am to Jster15
We moved the ball well against a very good defense. If we had discipline, the score would’ve been like 29-3.
I’m not worried about the offense at all. I am still very concerned about the defense and take their performance against Sackson Arnold with a giant dose of salt.
I’m not worried about the offense at all. I am still very concerned about the defense and take their performance against Sackson Arnold with a giant dose of salt.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 9:42 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
1. 3 plays 6 yards
2. 3 plays 8 yards
3. 5 for 16
4. 3 for -1
5. 9 for 57 (FG)
6. 4 for -6
7. 4 for 7
8. 8 for 33
9. 11 for 33
10. 1 for 2
11. 3 for -4
12. 3 for 0
13. 4 for 3
Careful, their AD gonna write you a strongly worded letter!
Posted on 9/30/25 at 9:43 am to FootballFrenzy
Sackson. That’s funny
Posted on 9/30/25 at 10:19 am to Tantal
quote:
The run back of the fluke INT accounted for 40% of Auburn's total yardage.
That doesn’t go into offense yards.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 10:22 am to Hugh McElroy
Auburn's average 3rd down distance was 10.7 yards, which means if they had spiked the ball on every 1st and 2nd down, they would've ended up with better field position.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 10:52 am to windsor1977
quote:
You obviously beat a below average team with little or no ability.
What is your point here? The story to me is that A&M did not win 52-0.
You better figure it out before you face real SEC competition. Everyone knows Auburn is the bottom of the SEC.
OU was riding high off of their far less impressive win over Auburn that had serious assistance from the refs. Not that you want a real conversation.
The things that had me most interested as an Aggie fan were 2 fold.
First, our D played absolutely lights out. 0-15 on 3rd and 4th Downs against any team with a pulse is insane. Auburn had only 1 explosive play and it was a contested catch where the WR only got the catch because joint possession goes to the offense. I did not expect that. A&M plays anything close to that level of D with their offense and they are going to be a real threat to go far.
Second, Auburn's strength was their Run D. No one has had any success on the ground against them and they have big and physical guys up front. A&M rushed for 207 and consistently were able to move the ball.
Lots to clean up for A&M. Penalties are inexcusably bad. Special teams mistakes have been costly 2 weeks in a row. We let Auburn hang around way too long and they had the ball with a minute left and a TD would win it. Keep doing that and we will lose games we should win. That said I'd much rather be trying to clean up something like that then try to figure out how we can get bigger, faster, or more athletic and be trying to find guys that can play. This is a very talented team and they have shown some real grit in the last 2 games that they can win when things aren't going their way. Matchup wise there isn't really a weakness on either side of the ball.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:02 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
That doesn’t go into offense yards.
I'm aware. Still, when the defense comes up with 40% of the offense's total production on one play, it wasn't a good day.
This post was edited on 9/30/25 at 11:30 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News