Started By
Message
Was the SEC schedule too much of a grind?
Posted on 3/21/25 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 2:50 pm
Average SEC team ranking in Torvik going into March 1st was 31.8.
Average SEC team ranking based on play from March 1st through now is #44.8.
Since March…
Auburn now playing as the #18 team… down 15 spots.
Tennessee now playing as the #16 team… down 12 spots.
Bama now playing like as the #12 team… down 6 spots.
Best rating in games between March 1st and today is #1 Florida… no other SEC team in the Top 11.
Average SEC team ranking based on play from March 1st through now is #44.8.
Since March…
Auburn now playing as the #18 team… down 15 spots.
Tennessee now playing as the #16 team… down 12 spots.
Bama now playing like as the #12 team… down 6 spots.
Best rating in games between March 1st and today is #1 Florida… no other SEC team in the Top 11.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 2:59 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
Was the SEC schedule too much of a grind?
Maybe.
Having literally no breather games to rotate in subs has to take a toll. Not quite as bad as if you have a similar grind in football, but it's still there.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:09 pm to AUTiger789
Best thing that happened to us last season was getting smoked by Florida in the first game of the SECT.
The energy difference after a solid week of rest was palpable.
The energy difference after a solid week of rest was palpable.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:13 pm to paperwasp
Agreed. Best outcome in the conference tourney imo is to win one game and then lose (without getting blown out) and save your legs.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:40 pm to Porcine Human
Meh…I don’t think the SECT has much to do with anything outside of a loss refocusing a really good team. The SEC was a bit overrated this year due to a flattening of the curve overall in college basketball.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:42 pm to AUTiger789
No. Some coaches suck in the tourney and some are great.
This is nothing new. More SEC teams in means more opportunity to have a coach that sucks in the tourney.
We already knew Mike white sucked in tourney. Missouri played a really good and underrated team. State has been wishy washy all season. Texas same thing..
No shockers really.
This is nothing new. More SEC teams in means more opportunity to have a coach that sucks in the tourney.
We already knew Mike white sucked in tourney. Missouri played a really good and underrated team. State has been wishy washy all season. Texas same thing..
No shockers really.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 4:36 pm to AUTiger789
Hell, the SEC was only .500 in conference play. They weren't that good.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 4:42 pm to ummagumma
quote:
Meh…I don’t think the SECT has much to do with anything outside of a loss refocusing a really good team. The SEC was a bit overrated this year due to a flattening of the curve overall in college basketball.
Overrated, the frick? No, they absolutely dominated non-conference in a massive way.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:06 pm to ummagumma
quote:
The SEC was a bit overrated this year due to a flattening of the curve overall in college basketball.
Agreed the top 4-5 teams are really good but the league as a whole is overrated and none of the other blue bloods are string this year outside of Duke and the traditional top mid majors like Gonzaga are weaker
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:07 pm to jsmoove
Because the ACC and Big East were way down this year
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:09 pm to AUTiger789
I think once the first weekend is over you'll see teams settling in. The first two rounds are the epitome of "survive and advance".
Popular
Back to top
